Beyond the Bogus News

OK, here's another sporadic post to this blog, sporadic not because there's nothing much to post about but because of my profound disillusionment with the state of humanity. Anyway, here's an interesting quote from BiBi that is referenced in this recent article  from Haaretz:

“Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas,” he told a meeting of his Likud party’s Knesset members in March 2019. “This is part of our strategy – to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.”

While it's one thing to accuse Israel of secretly "bolstering Hamas", it's quite another thing to hear Bibi himself stating that it's the best thing to do. It's not different to the way that guns found their way into the hands of American Indians who could use them to defend themselves against the encroachments of settlers. These "attacks" by the Indians could then be used as an excuse to wage military campaigns against them.

It's been suggested that elements of Israeli intelligence not only assist Hamas in acquiring weapons, directly or indirectly, but that they have direct control over its leadership. The rank and file of Hamas of course would be unaware of this. At the very least, there would be spies planted within Hamas ranks who would keep Israel apprised of any planned operations.

There's no doubt that Bibi had foreknowledge of the October 7th attacks and deliberately allowed them to proceed both for his own political advantage and as a means of laying claim to part or all of Gaza. More Israelis are waking up to the fact that Bibi is more akin to a Mafia boss than a politician and maybe his days are numbered but he should never be counted out.

Whether Bibi is at the helm or not, Israel remains a rogue nation that sooner or later must be brought to heel. To quote from Brendon O'Connell:

Forget China the greatest threat we face is from Israel who is not only installing it's electronic equipment through the world's telephone exchanges, it can draw on its vast 'sayanim network' to facilitate access to locations and databases it ordinarily cannot access via its state controlled companies. Not to mention its extensive security contracts with public class A infrastructure like airports etc.

Imagine a Quantum Computer - developed by Jews in the U.S (perhaps jointly with Israel) - linked in with the world's databases and the software that enables it to literally "predict the future" and track and trace every human on the planet and imagine it in the hands of people who think themselves God's "chosen people" with a history of religious and racial supremacism and a religion that promises they will rule the earth from Jerusalem?

I had to look up what was meant by the term "sayanim" and this is what Google's Bard produced:

The word “Sayanim” is the plural form of the Hebrew word “Sayan,” which means “helper” or “assistant.” In the context of the Mossad, the Sayanim are a network of volunteers who are not official members of the organization. They are typically Jewish people who live outside of Israel and who are willing to provide the Mossad with assistance, such as information or access to people or places.

The Sayanim network was reportedly established in the 1960s by then-Mossad chief Meir Amit. It is believed to be a large and diverse network of people, including business people, academics, and students. The Sayanim are said to be motivated by a sense of loyalty to Israel and a desire to help protect it from its enemies.

The Mossad has used the Sayanim network to gather intelligence, carry out operations, and maintain relationships with foreign governments. The network has been praised for its effectiveness, but it has also been criticized for its potential to lead to abuse.

Here are some examples of how the Sayanim have been used by the Mossad:

• In the 1960s, a Sayan in France helped the Mossad track down and capture Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann.
• In the 1980s, a Sayan in Norway helped the Mossad carry out the assassination of PLO leader Ali Hassan Salameh.
• In the 2000s, a Sayan in the United States helped the Mossad gather intelligence on Iran's nuclear program.

The Sayanim network is a valuable asset to the Mossad, but it is also a controversial one. The use of volunteers raises ethical concerns about the Mossad's accountability and the potential for abuse. However, the network has also proven to be effective in helping the Mossad achieve its goals. 

The Israeli master plan is quite clear. It aims to rid Gaza and the West Bank of Palestinians. The government would have no qualms about resorting to genocide if it thought it could get away with it but world opinion will hold them back from that option. The Gazans will be relocated to smart cities in the Sinai and the West Bank Palestinians to smart cities in Jordan. I say smart cities rather than refugee camps because there needs to be an incentive to relocate. Once ensconced in their new smart cities, the Palestinians will be under constant scrutiny while enjoying a veneer of freedom and autonomy.

Israel has made no secret of its plans to expand its borders to the Nile and Euphrates and so these smart cities will sooner or later be encompassed within Greater Israel. Perhaps the Palestinians will be displaced again to make way for the influx of Jews fleeing the orchestrated meltdown of the United States. Or perhaps Israel itself will melt down long before this. It is a deeply divided country that may end up as a blip in the history of the world, not surviving the centenary of its creation. Let's hope so. 

China and Israel

This article appeared on April 3rd 2019 in Gatestone Institute's website titled China's Han Superstate: The New Third Reich and is largely an exercise in China-bashing but there was some content of interest. Here is an excerpt:

The Third Reich and the People's Republic share a virulent racism, in China politely referred to as "Han chauvinism." The Han category, which is said to include about 92% of the population of the People's Republic, is in truth the amalgamation of related ethnic groups. 

Chinese mythology holds that all Chinese are descendants of the Yellow Emperor, who is thought to have ruled in the third millennium BCE. The Chinese consider themselves to be a branch of humanity separate from the rest of the world, a view reinforced by indoctrination in schools, among other means. 

Chinese scholars support this notion of Chinese separateness with the "Peking Man" theory of evolution, which holds the Chinese do not share a common African ancestor with the remainder of humankind. This theory of the unique evolution of the Chinese has, not surprisingly, reinforced racist views. 

As a result of racism, many in China, including officials believe themselves to be categorically different from and, by implication, superior to the rest of humankind, says Fei-Ling Wang, author of The China Order: Centralia, World Empire, and the Nature of Chinese Power.

This reminded me of Bibi's portrayal of Israelis as also being very special in terms of their entrepreneurial skills and technological prowess. Some Jews do regard themselves as belonging to God's chosen people and believe that the Jewish people are destined to rule the world. Of course, not all people who identify as Jews believe this, just as many Chinese do not believe that they are superior to the rest of humanity. Let's agree though that there is a streak of superiority running through the culture in both countries. Both would like to see themselves as the centre of the world. Additionally, both Israel and China have, in proportion to their respective populations, large diaspora communities and reputation as as entrepreneurs.

Both countries are technocracies and major players on the international stage. The totalitarian nature of China's technocracy has enabled it to become a testing ground for social engineering experiments that the governments of most other countries could not inflict on their populations without provoking revolution. Nonetheless, the technocrats outside of China secretly look on admiringly at the extent of China's control over its population. It's useful for these same technocrats to have China remain a totalitarian technocracy so that their own implementation of technocracy appears benevolent and moderate by comparison. In truth however, they will not be all that different and the populations of technocracies outside China will enjoy only a semblance of freedom. In most respects they will be identical, with individuals having every movement and financial transaction monitored.

After Winnie's departure, whether due to death by natural causes or some sort of coup, the Chinese technocrats will never allow another dictator like him (and Mao before him) to arise. They will have learned their lesson and a more moderate technocracy will emerge, at least overtly, that will blend in more easily with the worldwide model. There is really no need to curtail religious liberties and any other perceived liberties once full technocratic control has been established. Such control is being made possible by technology and specifically the Internet of Things. Any cults that might evolve and pose a threat to the established order will be snuffed out before they become serious threats. A strong, omnipresent police force is essential to enforce control and such a force needs not even be human given the progress being made in the development of robots and artificial intelligence. An international intelligence agency, with staff overseen by a supervising elite who are themselves only a tier below the ultimate ruling elite, will be the critical means of keeping control.

Dictators represent a threat to technocracy because their whims can disrupt the existing systems that are in place. Systems are at the heart of technocracy and they need to run smoothly. Dictators can prove useful in the earlier stages of establishing a worldwide technocracy, just as Xi Jinping is proving at the moment. Once they have outlived their usefulness, they will be removed. The technocracy that is China today only came into existence in the 1970's because of intervention by Western technocrats after Mao's demise. It is a Western invention that has morphed into the current totalitarian variant thanks to Mao's legacy in the nation's consciousness. This seems to be what Winnie has been possessed or obsessed by. Prior to his rise, the 19 members of the Politburo represented the technocratic rulership with the seven member Politburo Standing Committee holding the real power. Now all the power is concentrated in Winnie with the remaining committee members subservient to him.

Of course given that psychopaths comprise arguably 4% (or maybe 6%) of the population globally, it's inevitable that some will be attracted to and aspire to become technocrats because that is where the power resides in a technocracy. In their climb to the upper rungs of the ladder, they are very successful given their ruthlessness and complete absence of any sense of morality. This means that in a technocracy they will comprise far more than 4% of the technocratic population. They will always pose a threat to the smooth running of a technocracy because they have no belief in it or allegiance to it. Psychopaths are only interested in themselves. Winnie certainly looks the part of the smiling psychopath but whether he is one or not I don't know. In a way, technocracies themselves are inherently psychopathic, just as many corporations are, because the smooth running of both becomes the most important consideration and not their impact on human beings. Thus technocracies and psychopaths are a good fit but psychopaths don't like to share and thus cosy arrangements like the Politburo Standing Committee with its rotating leadership work well until one of the psychopaths within claims all the pie. No more sharing.

Israel and China are playing their parts in the move toward a worldwide technocracy to which nation states will be subservient. Israel has destabilised the Middle East, effectively and cleverly destroying any chance of Arab or Islamic unity. For a technocracy to be effective, individuals need be compliant and not able to band together into coherent groups that might challenge its imposition. A strong sense of identity, forged by identification with a religion, an ethnicity or a nation, needs to be undermined so that a sense of disconnectedness arises. This is being done while at the same time the opposite is happening with Israel. Jews all over the world are being encouraged to move to Israel to make it greater (and more populous). However, the rank and file Jews who choose to return or who are currently resident in Israel are merely part of a much larger, global game just as European Jews were in World War 2. The global elite care little for the rank and file whether they be Jewish or non-Jewish. It serves their interests to strengthen Israel at the moment.

China is the testing ground for the technologies and social engineering that will characterise the full flowering of technocracy. China's power will wane as its population shrinks and the power of the city state grows. For technocracy to fully take hold, people must be herded into cities where they can be effectively monitored and controlled. Urbanisation must continue until the countryside is effectively depopulated and dominated by huge conglomerates whose workers, whether human or robotic, are used to supply fruit, vegetables and meat to the cities. The process is well underway. Thus the notion of a nation state will be steadily eroded and replaced by a sense of belonging to a city state. People may journey to the countryside for holidays but they will not live or work there, simply because it won't be financially viable to do so. The few renegades who decide to abandon the cities and roam about the countryside will be easily monitored and committed to mental institutions if they prove too troublesome.

The ruling elite certainly don't envisage a planet will be a population of many billions of people as exists now and it has been working doggedly to reduce the number of humans over the decades, using a variety of approaches (more on that later). An ideal global population of around 500 million people is envisaged. There are 4416 cities in the world with a population of over 150,000. The number 4416 divided into 500,000,000 gives an average of 113,224. Cities will become far more homogenous than they are now and birthrates will be closely controlled so that city populations are maintained at approved levels so that the half billion target in sustained. Cities of between 100,000 and 200,000 inhabitants are much easier to keep supplied with electricity, food and water than some current cities that are 10 and even 100 times more populous. See my earlier blog on Smart Cities for more information on this topic.