A Match Made In Hell

In attempting to research this topic, I forgot to activate my VPN from within the country that I am resident in. The alert shown in Figure 1 was instantly displayed:

Figure 1: trying to access rumble

Oops! Somebody or a group of somebodies has decided that this is not suitable viewing on the pretext that my privacy is in jeopardy. Fortunately, I have a VPN and I can choose a country that has not yet put rumble on its blacklist. It won't be long before VPNs will be made illegal and anybody who wants to use the Internet will require authorisation via a digital ID. When that time comes, only officially approved websites will be accessible.

This post is about Pfizer's recent acquisition of a cancer research company called Seagen for a whopping $43 billion dollars, despite the latter company recording losses of hundreds of millions of dollars over the last couple of years ($602 million in 2022 and $738 million in 2023). Here is a link to a video on rumble that discusses the acquisition. Here is a link to the Pfizer website in which the acquisition is proudly announced on December 23rd 2023. Here is an excerpt:

“Cancer remains a leading cause of death, and one in three people in the U.S. will receive a cancer diagnosis in their lifetime. With one of the largest investments in Pfizer’s history, we are going all in on cancer with the goal of delivering breakthroughs that drastically improve the lives of people with cancer,” said Dr. Albert Bourla, Pfizer Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. “With Seagen’s proprietary, world-leading Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) technology, together with the scale and strength of Pfizer's capabilities and expertise, we are poised to change the cancer treatment paradigm. We believe Oncology will be a significant growth driver for Pfizer and contribute meaningfully to the achievement of our near- and long-term financial goals.”

So there are profits to be made because cancer is poised to become "a significant growth driver in the near- and long-term". Pfizer needs to recoup its $43 billion investment and seems confident that it will. Does the company know something? Of course it does. The term "turbo cancers" only came into vogue less than a year ago and has of course baffled medical professionals. People in their thirties, forties and fifties are suddenly being diagnosed with advanced and aggressive cancers. People whose cancers were in remission suddenly find that they are reactivated. All these people received their Covid vaccinations and yet this is dismissed as a possible cause.

Perhaps "dismissed" is too strong a word because that would imply the medical establishment had at least entertained the possibility of a link when in fact the possibility was never entered their minds at all. The vast majority of doctors and nurses are programmed to never doubt the efficacy of vaccines. Those that have doubts know to keep it to themselves. A very few will voice their concerns publicly and thus attract the attention of the medical mafia who will do their utmost to end the professional life of their foolhardy brethren.

Pfizer made billions of dollars in vaccine sales from the fake pandemic and it now stands to make billions, perhaps trillions more, from the sale of pharmaceuticals designed to combat the turbo cancers that the vaccines have caused. As the company says "we are going all in on cancer" and the pharmaceuticals that they will be peddling will have all sorts of nasty side effects that may prolong the life of sufferers but make them far more miserable than they might have been without the intervention. In the end, they will die. They will not be cured because the last thing that Pfizer and the medical establishment want is a cure. 

Doubtless, mRNA technology will be involved in the development of these products, and the fear factor will be ramped up to terrify even those who are currently cancer-free to submit to a miracle cancer vaccine to be taken yearly. As this article announces:

The next big advance in cancer treatment could be a vaccine

After decades of limited success, scientists say research has reached a turning point, with many predicting more vaccines will be out in five years.

These aren’t traditional vaccines that prevent disease, but shots to shrink tumors and stop cancer from coming back. Targets for these experimental treatments include breast and lung cancer, with gains reported this year for deadly skin cancer melanoma and pancreatic cancer.

“We’re getting something to work. Now we need to get it to work better,” said Dr. James Gulley, who helps lead a center at the National Cancer Institute that develops immune therapies, including cancer treatment vaccines.

More than ever, scientists understand how cancer hides from the body’s immune system. Cancer vaccines, like other immunotherapies, boost the immune system to find and kill cancer cells. And some new ones use mRNA, which was developed for cancer but first used for COVID-19 vaccines.

It can be noted that there is no attempt to find what might be causing these cancers. The focus is solely on treatment via drugs or vaccines. The twentieth century saw the rise of allopathic, drug-based medicine to the detriment of all other forms of alternative medicine. The massive investment by philanthropists in schools of allopathic medicine ensured this dominance which continues into the current century along with its unholy alliance with the pharmaceutical industry. Indeed a match made in hell. 

I happened to notice that sleazy Russell Brand, card-carrying member of the controlled opposition, is railing on YouTube against the sinister implications of this acquisition of Seagen by Pfizer. Clearly the gatekeepers are not worried about this conspiratorial sort of speculation spreading and confident that their future plans for humanity's cull are on course.

Brazil

I can't help noticing the current news focus on Brazil where supposedly a near variant of the Covid-19 virus is raging out of control. 337,000 people have died and there are no places left to bury the dead. The President of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, has not been following the rules when it comes to the pandemic: he has downplayed the seriousness of the virus, failed to enforce lockdowns, refused to be vaccinated and even said that:

"... he would "fight to prevent the distribution of the 'gay kit'" [a set of guidelines proposed by UNESCO to promote the rights of the LGBT community in primary schools] because "their intention is to promote homosexuality, which is an affront to the family structure ..."

He's even been heard to utter "God above everything". Clearly this guy is not reading the script that other global leaders have been given. Leaders can talk about Gaia but not God and they must submit to WHO directives and openly support the LGBT community.

His most recent offences came in December of 2020 when he criticised Big Pharma:

Bolsonaro criticised pharmaceutical giant Pfizer. "In the Pfizer contract it's very clear: 'we're not responsible for any side effects'. If you turn into a crocodile, it's your problem," said Bolsonaro. Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro has instigated a verbal attack on COVID-19 vaccines and the pharmaceutical companies making them. He has suggested that the COVID-19 vaccine developed by Pfizer-BioNTech could turn people who take it into "crocodiles". This is the not first time Bolsonaro has made controversial statements regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. Earlier this year, he branded the coronavirus as 'a little flu'. This week he made clear that he won't be getting the vaccine for himself even though his administration is launching a mass inoculation programme in Brazil. The Brazilian President said once a COVID-19 vaccine has been certified by the country's regulatory body Anvisa, "it will be available for everyone that wants it. But me, I won't get vaccinated." Bolsonaro criticised pharmaceutical giant Pfizer. He stated on Thursday, "In the Pfizer contract it's very clear: 'we're not responsible for any side effects'. If you turn into a crocodile, it's your problem." Source.

Responsible leaders do not criticise Big Pharma and if they do, then they must be eliminated (as was the former President of Tanzania) or at least embarrassed. So how much of the current crisis in Brazil is media-hype and how much is reality? At the moment, the hype is well and truly hyperbolic. If we go back to June 18th 2020, this video appeared on BitChute with the commentary:

A few politicians that have not sold their souls to the New World Order takeover are starting to Wake Up. Doctors, Nurses, and Hospital Technicians from around the world have been saying since VERY EARLY ON that the COVID-19 PLANdemic is a False Flag HOAX Event. The Brazil Parliament left the government buildings and went out to the main hospital tasked with taking care of Coronavirus Patients and made a UNANNOUNCED, SURPRISE VISIT since the hospital just reported that it had 5,000 patients and 200 dead this past week. The Parliament found the building was completely empty, other than a few hospital workers hanging out. This is also the reason President Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil recently asked the men and women of Brazil to get armed up with firearms to prevent any kind of dictatorship takeover, which is the goal of the Illuminati's New World Order agenda.

Most hospitals have been completely empty since this entire fiasco was pushed out by the World Hell Organisation, the Medical Mafia, Big Pharma, and Kill Gates. A majority of medical personnel have been on furlough at home because all elective surgeries were stopped. People that have real emergencies are not going to hospitals for fear of being thrown onto a ventilator, so the hospital collects the $39,000 bonus for using a ventilator, and then 90% of the time the person ends up dying. More and more people are coming to realise that this so-called Novel Coronavirus has been nothing more than the common yearly Flu. Every year a new strain of Flu comes out, and that is why Flu shots can NEVER work to protect people. They are also finding that 75% or more of the positive test numbers and deaths are ALL FAKE. Anyone that is wearing masks out in public should have SHEEPLE tattooed on their foreheads, those are the people that are likely too brainwashed to ever Wake Up.

So even back in June of last year, there were suspicions about the numbers of reported cases of Covid-19 in Brazil. On December 20th of 2020, Ognir on his BitChute channel created a video using data from the EU Open Data Portal in which he debunks the claim that there is a crisis in Brazil. He says the data is manipulated and points to suspicious spikes in the daily tallies. He has uploaded another video on March 29th 2021 that is in a similar vein. In his analyses, he makes a point of not counting the 97% of deaths involving co-morbidities but he doesn't explain where this figure came from. I don't fully understand the details of what he's doing and he doesn't explain himself very well but he's one of the few people that have challenged the statistics.

Here is an example of the official statistics taken from this source on April 10th, 2021:

Figure 1: source

The figure of 3% dead of course is rather high and this is where the co-morbidities inflate the numbers because anybody dying with Covid-19 and having pre-existing medical problems is diagnosed as dying of Covid-19. Figure 2 shows a comparison with Indonesian data from two days ago (source). There are 267 million people in Indonesia versus 214 million in Brazil, yet Brazil has more than six times the number affected (12.14 million versus 1.55 million).

Figure 2: source

The 2.82% mortality rate for Indonesia is about the same as for Brazil but again the figures are maybe inflated for the same reason. If we believe Ognir, then perhaps only 3% of this 2.82% (0.0846%) is really caused by Covid-19. This translates to less than one death per 1000 people for both Indonesia and Brazil.

So is Covid-19 nothing more than the seasonal flu rebranded or is it a virus that was concocted in a Bio Lab and accidentally or deliberately released? The pandemic rehearsal in late 2019 (Event 201) suggests that those in charge knew what was coming and this supports the deliberate release theory. There's no doubt the lethality of this virus has been exaggerated but there are also studies emerging showing that the aftereffects of the virus include a range of neurological and psychiatric problems in about a third of those who have recovered.

Recently the discovery of nanoworms (perhaps morgellons or micelles) in disposable face masks and testing swabs have led some to suspect that it is these "creatures", attracted by heat and moisture, that are causing the symptoms associated with so-called Long Covid by "worming" their way through the blood-brain barrier. Anything is possible and there's no doubt the global elite are growing more confident and brazen is the pursuit of their agenda. Certainly one of their tools is working effectively, that of spreading confusion, fear and uncertainty via the mass media and compliant NGOs.

UPDATE:

I came across this video by DDN on YouTube, from mid-2020, that brands Bolsonaro as "The Most Dangerous Man on Earth".

The video is informative in that it reminds us of the rise and fall of liberation theology, a term I remember from decades ago. The commentator points out that this focus by some South American Catholic clergy on helping the poor gain more of a voice in politics was crushed by the hierarchy of the Catholic Church. It was replaced by Evangelical Christianity that focused on the hereafter rather than the here and now, thus being less threatening to vested interests. The commentator also reminds us that it was Bolsonaro who has been active in wanting to relocate the Brazilian Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. He has also been pushing for further destruction of the Brazilian rainforests. So, while he may be lauded for his skepticism concerning Covid-19, he certainly has his flagrant flaws.

A Vaccine for Alzheimer's?

An article appeared in the science section of The Telegraph (21st March 2018) claiming that drugs to vaccinate over-50s against Alzheimer’s could be here in a decade. 

New analysis commissioned by Alzheimer’s Research UK found that drugs to halt, slow or reverse the disease could be available in as little as three years with major vaccine and screening programmes possible within a decade.

This would be a huge money-spinner for Big Pharma so my suspicions are immediately aroused and so I sought to find out a little more about Alzheimer's Research UK. Is it just another facade to mask the machinations of the pharmaceutical industry? On it's website it claims:

We believe in the power of research to change the future and we’re funding a unique Research Network of over 700 dementia researchers across 15 Centres in the UK – bringing together the best minds to defeat dementia.

Some funding comes from donations but it would be interesting to see how much comes from Big Pharma. In its 2018 Annual Review it states that:

It’s been a record year. In 2016/17 our income rose to £30.5 million, fuelled by a 44% increase in donations, allowing us to power more dementia research than ever before.

 

Of course, this still doesn't give us any idea of the relative contributions by individuals and pharmaceutical companies. In the Annual Report for 2017, it states that:

Total income rose strongly to £30.5m, up 38% on 2016 (£22m). This growth was underpinned by donations and legacies delivering £29.1m, an increase of 44% from 2016 (£20.2m). Legacy income delivered an extra £1.7m whilst donations increased by £7.2m from 2016. Investment income performed well, with an increase of 12% to £731,035 (2016: £655,520), and the portfolio remains strong, generating net gains of £787,448 (2016: £1,470,033) in the year. Alzheimer’s Research UK receives no income from government sources for our research. 

An increase in funding of 44% is quite a lot and most of it has come from donations. I'm doubtful whether donations from individuals would have increased significantly from 2016 to 2017. The organisation makes it clear that no income is derived from government sources so it would seem that corporate sponsors have been largely responsible for the increase in donations. However, how do we find out who these corporate sponsors are? There's much mention made of the organisation's corporate partners and this is made up of organisations that have made Alzheimer's Research UK their favourite charity and things of this sort. These organisations carry out fund-raising activities and support various initiatives but don't apparently make direct donations.

There is no indication of any support from the pharmaceutical industry. I'm not criticising such support but if there are significant financial contributions from the industry then why is it not transparent? Of relevance here is this news (posted on 8th January 2018) from Alzheimer's Research UK's website that it is:

calling for a recommitment from pharmaceutical companies to continue efforts to fund research into dementia, the leading cause of death in the UK. Recent news that Pfizer will refocus efforts away from dementia research is a reminder of one of the barriers that stands in the way of bringing about the first life-changing treatment for dementia. 

Clearly then Pfizer has been helping out financially but is now reducing its investment. However, donations are up 44%. So what's going on? Well, the 2017 corporate donations would been determined late in 2016 and Pfizer's announcement that it is abandoning research to find new drugs aimed at treating Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease was fairly recent (Saturday 6th January 2018). So while the company may have spent money in 2017, it clearly won't be doing so in 2018.  Perhaps other big pharmaceutical companies are of a similar mind and so donations may plummet for 2018.

It is important to establish the extent of the financial support from the pharmaceutical industry because then it possible to gauge the degree of control they have over the direction of research. It turns out that Alzheimer's Research UK recently acquired a new director of research. Her career path is described in an article taken from this site (24th May 2017):

My original interest in neuroscience was purely due to a brilliant neuroscience lecturer who taught me during my degree, and so when a PhD advert in neuroscience popped up on a board, I applied.  The technology I developed during my PhD then enabled me to take a role in a Pharmaceutical company out in California setting up this technology and supporting the expansion of neuroscience within the company.

After five years in California, I began to miss England and so took a role back in the UK again working in preclinical neuroscience. This led to a role in SmithKline Beecham and it was here that I really took a keen interest in the more translational side of neuroscience, progressing potential new medicines from the lab bench towards patients. After several industry and Biotech positions within translational medicine, I took a slight change in career to join the new Dementia Discovery Fund, a fund focussed around the development of new treatments for dementia, before finally joining Alzheimer’s Research UK. Whilst I remain a strong supporter of the Dementia Discovery Fund, the philanthropic approach of Alzheimer’s research UK, and the focus on basic research and translational medicine are more strongly aligned to my aspirations.

Her allegiance is clearly to the pharmaceutical industry and this is not necessarily a criticism but it does suggest that the direction of any research she approves will be drug-oriented. It's unlikely that she would incline toward research of the following type:

New research from Lund University in Sweden has shown that intestinal bacteria can accelerate the development of Alzheimer's disease. According to the researchers behind the study, the results open up the door to new opportunities for preventing and treating the disease. Source

The reason is there's probably not much money to be made in regulating intestinal bacteria. It might even be possible to do it for free! This leads back to the article cited at the start of this post that goes on to say that the new drugs being trialled could come with a £9 billion price tag. The article continues:

Already 12 Alzheimer’s drugs are in late Phase III trials, the final hurdle before licensing ... the 12 drugs coming through the pharma pipeline could provide a lifeline for patients. Most of the clinical trials involve drugs which target sticky clumps of beta-amyloid, which accumulate in the brain and stop neurones from communicating. Several vaccine-like treatments - which work more like a ‘statin for the brain’ than a traditional jab - are currently at an earlier stage of development, undergoing Phase I and II trials, said the experts. The report estimates that a vaccine could prevent around 70 per cent of Alzheimer’s cases. Speaking at a news briefing in London, report co-author Professor Jonathan Schott, from University College London's Dementia Research Centre, said: "The availability of new treatments for Alzheimer's disease is a when and not an if. "Our patients are desperate for new treatments. When the media reports any hint of a new treatment for Alzheimer's disease our clinics are inundated. “When we have a successful trial, and I say when, this will be headline news around the world and the demand will be instant and huge."

Statins for the brain sounds scary and statins of course are scary drugs (visit this site). It's not clear how the new treatments work but they promise to make a lot of money for the pharmaceutical companies with successful marketing. That's why it's surprising that Pfizer is reducing its involvement, given the tone of the Telegraph article. However, it seems that some of the new drugs that are being trialled are not living up to the hype and are proving disappointing. For example, this article from The Guardian (10th January 2018) reveals:

The quest to develop drugs to treat Alzheimer’s disease has experienced a new setback, with a promising medication failing to show benefits in the latest series of clinical trials. Earlier trials had suggested that the drug idalopirdine, from the Danish international pharmaceutical company Lundbeck, might improve cognition in those with Alzheimer’s disease when taken alongside existing drugs – known as cholinesterase inhibitors – acting to improve symptoms rather than stopping the disease from developing. But the latest trials have dashed such hopes.

The Telegraph article seems like an attempt on the part of Alzheimer's Research UK to maintain the marketing hype surrounding these "promising" new drugs in the face of declining interest from Big Pharma. The prospects of Big Pharma defeating Alzheimer's Disease anytime soon seem unlikely and this makes the Telegraph article simply a ploy to stem a likely drying of corporate donations.

Pneumococcal Vaccine

The heading of this article in today's 9NEWS.com.au caught my attention: Death no incentive for lung infection vax. The entire article is reproduced below:

Potential death is not enough to make three quarters of Australian adults vaccinate against pneumococcal pneumonia, a survey reveals. The research shows efforts to raise public awareness of the seriousness of the infection are failing, says Associate Professor Lucy Morgan of the Lung Foundation Australia. 

"Even among high-risk groups, such as those aged over 65, there are no overwhelmingly high motivators for vaccination," she said. Pneumococcal pneumonia is a severe lung infection responsible for a large proportion of pneumonia cases aged 65 and above. An online survey of 1241 adults for the foundation found 75 per cent of adults cannot be motivated to protect against the infection, despite being informed of its seriousness and potentially fatal complications. Of those, 73 per cent are considered high risk of contracting the infection because of their age or a pre-existing condition. 

Infectious diseases paediatrician and immunisation expert Professor Robert Booy says there is a 93 per cent vaccine rate among Australian children. "However, among equally vulnerable senior, we're failing to achieve even 50 per cent pneumococcal vaccine uptake, which could offer up to five more years of high-quality life," he said. "Given grandchildren may pass pneumonia onto their grandparents, and vice-versa, protecting against pneumococcal infection would enrich their lives." 

The Lung Foundation Australia is releasing its research on Tuesday to mark Know Pneumonia Day.

According to this government website, immunisation against pneumococcal disease is achieved using single-disease vaccines. For babies, the first dose of pneumococcal vaccine is recommended at two months of age, with subsequent doses at four and six months of age. While the babies who receive the vaccine have no choice in the matter, adults do and the article laments that 75 per cent of adults cannot be motivated to protect against the infection. The article implies that they're dicing with death and the oldies in particular are just throwing away five more years of high-quality life and maybe passing the damn disease on to their grandchildren. The Lung Foundation Australia is releasing these shocking statistics to mark Know Pneumonia Day. So what is Lung Foundation Australia all about?

Well it turns out that it has offices very near where I grew up. It's official address is Level 2, 11 Finchley Street, Milton QLD 4064. Its website states that:

We ensure lung health is a priority for all in Australia by:

• Promoting the importance of lung health
• Promoting early diagnosis of lung disease
• Supporting those with lung disease, their families and carers
• Promoting equitable access to evidence-based care
• Funding quality research

We rely on donations, membership, bequests, grants, business and industry support.

So who keeps Lung Foundation Australia afloat? Who are the big sponsors? It doesn't take long to find out:

 

Hmmm, well Boehringer Ingelheim is one of the world's leading research-driven pharmaceutical companies with 130 years of experience and Roche is a leader in research-focused healthcare with combined strengths in pharmaceuticals and diagnostics. Get the picture? BIG PHARMA finances this foundation and it is BIG PHARMA that manufactures the pneumococcal vaccine. Perhaps there's a conflict of interest here but that's not an issue likely to be raised on 9NEWS.com.au. It's sounds quite reasonable at first sight: Lung Foundation Australia, whose sole non-profit interest is to keep you breathing, urges all right-thinking adults to line up for their pneumococcal vaccinations. It's in the best interests of themselves, their grandchildren and, just coincidentally, BIG PHARMA.

The drug companies must dream of a day where vaccinations like this are simply mandatory for everybody. 93% of Australian babies are already covered and you can bet that elderly people in nursing homes have little say in the matter as well. It's those damn 75% of adults who are proving a problem. Well, a sensational article with the heading Death no incentive for lung infection vax can't do any harm. It may panic some of them into having the jab. So how effective is this vaccine? Are there any side-effects? This article, admittedly from 2011, shows that we ought to be cautious:

UK Scraps Pneumonia Vaccines Because They 'Don't Work' 

When deciding whether or not to vaccinate, it's important to consider the risks versus the benefits. Case in point, new advice from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) in the UK has determined that routine vaccination of people over 65 with the pneumococcal vaccine should be discontinued. The Committee stated: 

"JCVI has concluded that the protection the vaccine provides is poor and is not long-lasting in older people. In addition, the programme has had no discernable impact on the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease in older people. The committee has advised, therefore, that there is little benefit to continuing the programme and that it should be stopped." 

Millions of people over 65 have already received the pneumonia vaccine, which was often offered alongside the flu vaccine in the UK -- and the Department of Health was reportedly still promoting it as recently as January. 

For a vaccine that has provided "poor" protection against illness, the stakes have been high. Mail Online reported official figures from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency that stated the vaccine, sold under brand names Pneumovax and Pneumovax II, has been linked to 30 deaths and more than 3,300 reported side effects. LINK

A supposedly more effective pneumococcal vaccine was introduced by Pfizer in 2014 but there is clearly cause for concern. So for the elderly, as with the young, the list of suggested vaccines keeps rising: pneumococcal, flu, shingles, diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis are suggested by the Australian Government. At the moment, such vaccinations are optional but it won't be long before certain penalties will apply to seniors who don't submit to them, in the same way that child support payments are now being withheld from parents who don't fully vaccinate their children.