Distortions

Link to Tweet

Here is another example of misinformation from those who are seemingly on our side. Maybe he was thinking this and he never actually said it. If we perpetuate this fabrication in an effort to disparage the WHO, we leave ourselves open to ridicule. Here is Gemini's analysis:

Here is a direct analysis of the veracity of the information presented in the file named "Screenshot 2026-08-10 at 10.08.42.png".

The Verdict: False/Misattributed

The image contains a mixture of historical fact and a fabricated quote. While the man pictured, Brock Chisholm, was indeed the first Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), he never said or wrote the quote attributed to him in the image.

Here is a breakdown of the facts regarding this image:

1. The Persona (True)

Brock Chisholm was a Canadian psychiatrist, medical practitioner, and the first Director-General of the WHO, serving from 1948 to 1953.

2. The Quote (False)

There is no historical record in any of Chisholm's speeches, lectures, or writings of him saying: "To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men, their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas."

3. The Origin of the Misquote

The text in the image is a highly distorted summarization of Chisholm's actual views, created by his critics and later falsely presented as a direct quotation.

Chisholm was a highly controversial figure in his time. Following the devastation of World War II, he delivered the William Alanson White Memorial Lectures in 1946 (later published in the journal Psychiatry). In these lectures, he expressed views that shocked many conservative commentators of the era:

⚬ On Dogma and Morality: He argued that strict adherence to rigid religious dogmas and traditional concepts of "right and wrong" caused psychological neuroses and contributed to the behavioral rigidity that leads to war.

⚬ On Patriotism: He advocated that to prevent future global conflicts, humanity needed to develop a sense of global citizenship that superseded strict national loyalties.

During the 1950s, political critics and conservative groups strongly opposed his ideology. They summarized his complex, psychological arguments into hostile talking points. Over the decades, one of these critical summaries was mistakenly (or intentionally) put into quotation marks and attributed directly to Chisholm, which is what circulates in internet memes like the one in your screenshot today.

Misinformation

Like the War on Terror or the War on Poverty, there are also Fights to be Fought and the Fight against Online Misinformation is one of the most pressing because there is a lot of it about, originating from those crazies who dare to question the official narrative. Figure 1 shows a character from a board game titled "Sentinels of the Multiverse: Miss Information Villain Character (2013)". Appropriately, for the purposes of this blog post, the character is a "villain" disguised as a "demure office worker". This play on words was prompted by a BBC news article, the content of which I've included in full:

Pinterest to direct vaccine searches to health sites 

Pinterest users searching for vaccine-related information will be directed to results from "public health organisations". Last year, the social platform stopped showing results for vaccine searches to tackle the spread of misinformation. Social media companies are facing increasing scrutiny over how they moderate content on their sites. In recent months, other firms including Facebook have taken some steps to address vaccine misinformation.  

Under the new policy, Pinterest said searches for "measles," "vaccine safety" and other related health terms will return results from public health bodies including the World Health Organization (WHO), the Centres for Disease Control  (CDC) and the WHO-established Vaccine Safety Net. "We're taking this approach because we believe that showing vaccine misinformation alongside resources from public health experts isn't responsible," the firm said in a statement. "As we continue to tackle health misinformation, we remove it and the accounts that spread it from our service," Pinterest said. The firm also said it won't show ads, comments or recommendations on results pages for vaccine searches. 

What are vaccines and how do they work? 

How anti-vaccine movements threaten global health 

Content crackdown 

The WHO said anti-vaccine views were a "top 10 global health threat" in 2019.

The volume of anti-vaccine sentiment on social media has risen in recent years, sparking concern that it is having a negative impact on immunisation rates in some countries. In recent months, some platforms have taken steps to counter false information about vaccines. 

YouTube stopped serving ads to a number of popular channels that promote anti-vaccine conspiracy theories. 

The move in February followed protests from companies who discovered their adverts were running alongside the controversial videos. 

Instagram blocks vaccine hoax hashtags

'Don't be taken in by anti-vaccine myths on social media' 

In a statement in March, Facebook said it was working to "tackle vaccine misinformation… by reducing its distribution and providing people with authoritative information on the topic". The company said measures to be taken included rejecting ads with misinformation about vaccines and not showing misleading content on hashtag pages. Instagram - which is owned by Facebook - said in May it would block hashtags being used to spread "verifiably false" information about vaccinations.

Figure 1: Source

Appropriately, the article is categorised under Business and that of course is what it's all about. The article is self explanatory and the implications are starkly clear: frequenters of Pinterest and other social media sites no longer have to decide what constitutes misinformation. It is being decided for them by the information overlords who can be relied upon to protect visitors from misinformation or disinformation (meaning information that the overlords find disagreeable for whatever reason).

Ultimately, companies hosting websites that contain alleged misinformation will be forced to shut these sites down but for the moment that is not the case. In the meantime, as mainstream social media sites continue to further restrict access to alternative information, one approach is to direct visitors to alternative news websites. This could take the form of a single URL leading to a web location containing links to multiple alternative news sites.

The caption could read: 

INFORMATION, DISINFORMATION OR MISINFORMATION?

YOU SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO DECIDE.

YOUTUBE, FACEBOOK, TWITTER, PINTEREST ETC.

SHOULDN'T DECIDE FOR YOU.

CLICK BELOW TO MAKE YOUR OWN DECISIONS

ABOUT WHAT THESE SOCIAL MEDIA SITES 

DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE

It's harder for algorithms to detect and delete such "misinformation capsules" (for want of a better term) that could be scattered all over the Internet. There will always be people who object to having their information filtered but who lack time to search for the unfiltered variety. Perhaps the misinformation capsule will be the red pill that sets them free.