Bring on the Bots

This article appeared in Live Science and begins:

The recent suggestion that British ministers may have to consider culling or vaccinating animals to prevent the coronavirus from picking up another dangerous mutation and jumping back to humans may sound like sudden panic, but it's just part of a long debate among scientists.

Evidence that cats could be infected with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID, emerged as early as April 2020 from Wuhan, China. Evidence that they could also transmit the infection to other cats under particular conditions appeared in the same month. Since then, infections have been confirmed in mink in Denmark and the Netherlands, in big cats in zoos, in dogs, ferrets and a range of other species.

Clearly, it won't be long before vaccines are mandatory for all pets and culls will be declared if things get out of hand. Your chipped and vaccinated pet may need to be handed over to be disposed "humanely" if tests come back positive for whatever the virus or virus variant of the day is. The expense and intermittent trauma of having pets put down due to phoney tests will drive people to invest in robotic pets that will be far more suitable for the smart cities that humanity will be crowded into.

Animals are full of pathogens and having them living with humans in smart homes is just not very smart. Humans are no different in terms of harbouring dangerous pathogens but provided they wear masks, get vaccinated regularly and keep their distance from others then that's the best that can be hoped for at present. In time, the masks, lockdowns, social distancing, travel restrictions, job losses, lack of sunshine, police and army surveillance will undermine immune systems, leading to sickness and death. Suicide rates will soar. 

The vaccines, administered regularly as new variants of the virus emerge, will kill and sicken millions but be blamed on the effects of more virulent strains of the pathogen. Male and female fertility will plummet and global populations will crash. Sexbots will proliferate because sex between males and females requires unacceptably close contact and thus a grand opportunity for pathogens to spread. Welcome to the future.

POSTSCRIPT:

Here is a link to an interesting article I read that is an edited extract from "God, Human, Animal, Machine" by Meghan O’Gieblyn, published by Doubleday on 24 August. It's titled:

A dog’s inner life: what a robot pet taught me about consciousness

The Influenza Vaccine and COVID-19

An interesting article on the Home Vaccine Education Network suggests that those who have had regular flu shots may be at risk of more severe reactions to the COVID-19 virus and it could also be a contributing factor in the onset of so-called "long COVID" that I dealt with in an earlier post. The article also some interesting background on the flu vaccine that I'll include below:

The Flu Shot:  Never Supported by Science

In 1972, Dr. John Anthony Morris reported his research findings on the influenza vaccine to his superiors at the FDA.  A distinguished doctor and government researcher, Dr. Morris had been comissioned 13 years earlier to scientifically justify the FDA's plans to widely expand the flu vaccination program.   To his expectant audience, however, his results were thoroughly disappointing.   Dr. Morris reported that the flu shot provided no measurable net benefit, in part because the injected product failed to stimulate antibody production in the lungs, thus allowing for viral replication in this sensitive area.   It was later realised that the lack of benefit also derives from the flu shot's ability to  increase vulnerability to viruses not covered in the shot, including unmatched strains of flu and different respiratory viruses dangerous in their own right.   Dr. Morris' finding of no net benefit of the influenza vaccine has been repeatedly verified with contemporary data, including a study by Simonsen et al. (2005)   that found that the large increase in flu vaccination of the elderly between 1980 and 2001 failed to decrease flu season mortality, and a study in Britain which found that the vast increase in flu shot uptake by those who had just turned 65 (vs. those who were just a bit younger) provided no decline in hospitalisations or deaths.

Corruption, Not Public Health 

Given the powerful results of   Dr. Morris' research, the flu vaccine's only perk could be to line the pockets of Big Pharma, and should have been regulated out of existence.  Unfortunately, the cozy relationship between the FDA, CDC, and the pharmaceutical industry, well documented today, is not a new phenomena.   Instead of reconsidering the vaccination program Dr. Morris' supervisors swiftly closed his laboratory and blocked publication of his results.    Breathing a sigh of relief that good science would not be placed in the way of good profits, Big Pharma continued pushing for expansion of the flu shot market.  Even if there wasn't a huge benefit in ordinary years, they argued, it was important to have manufacturing in place in order to churn out large quantities of vaccine quickly to save the world during the next serious pandemic (History of Vaccines, by Arthur Allen).

The Flu Shot Makes A Flu Pandemic - Worse?

Enter 2009, the first major flu pandemic to occur after  mass influenza vaccination had become a reality.  Big pharma did indeed heroically turn out millions of doses of pandemic influenza vaccine.     Unfortunately,  most of the doses did not become available to the general public until after the pandemic was nearly over.  In addition there was the inconvenient finding that individuals who had obediently taken the seasonal flu vaccine the year before were  more likely  to develop pandemic influenza illness that was medically attended.    Public health experts were shocked by these findings but kept their lips sealed as Big Pharma and their sponsored government agencies used  the public spotlight on the flu in 2009 as a springboard to push for an even larger flu vaccination program.   For the first time the flu vaccine was recommended for every American citizen, especially children, who by 2020 were the largest consumers of the shot despite lack of evidence of benefit and the mercury that was allowed to remain in the vaccine.

The Flu Shot Promotes Other Viruses

As alluded to above, 2009 was not an anomaly; the flu shot  routinely increases the rate of infection with other pathogens, negating any benefits of the shot.   While many of the studies of this phenomena worked with patients who had freely chosen whether or not to take the flu shot, (Dierig et al., 2014), one study met the gold standard of a blinded, randomised, placebo controlled trial (Cowling et al., 2012).  While it has been generally hypothesised that the mechanism of the increase in non-flu illnesses is viral interference - the observation that illness with one virus may block others  - it was found by Riken et al. (2018)  that the increase in non-flu infections starts in the first 14 days after receipt of the flu vaccine, before any immunity to the flu has developed.  This indicates that like the DTP vaccine and other inactivated pathogen vaccines, the vaccine engenders non-specific immune system changes which increase vulnerability to certain other infections.  Most of the studies on the flu vaccine have focused on children, or found statistically significant results only in children, however one study to find an affect in adults found that while the flu shot appeared to offer cross protection against certain pathogens for this population, the vulnerability to several other pathogens, including coronavirus, was specifically increased.   This study was with regards to "old" coronaviruses, not COVID-19.    The potential of the flu shot to fuel COVID-19, however, was firmly established, and, as we demonstrated above, can now clearly be seen in the COVID data.

The article presents a rather simplified bar graph to illustrate the impact that the level of flu vaccinations have on COVID mortality rates (see Figure 1):

Figure 1

In regards to these results, the article observes that:

Countries with high flu vaccine coverage, as of July 2020, suffered up to at least 20 times more COVID-19 fatalities/million as countries with low coverage. There appears to be a TIPPING POINT  that occurs at 45% -50% flu vaccine coverage. At vaccination coverage levels either below or above this point there is little correlation with COVID fatality, but the average fatality rate in countries with coverage over the tipping point is significantly higher.  This indicates that reaching a certain density of individuals made especially vulnerable to COVID  by flu vaccination results in connected clusters of vulnerability that span the system (that is, the percolation threshold is reached) which suddenly creates  sharply worse outcomes.   This could be explained if there is an exceptionally virulent variant or variants of COVID that spreads only among flu vaccinated individuals, because it has adapted to immune system shifts that are commonly triggered by the vaccine.  This variant could only become widespread when it can easily spread along chains of vaccinated individuals.

The most powerful correlation, however, is seen when we look at vaccination rates of children (again, 2018/2019 season).  For this data there appears to be a small tipping point around 63% and a much larger one  around 69%.  Every single state with a high COVID death rate, including New York, had a high flu vaccination rate of children.  Since child deaths nonetheless remain low, this must indicate that the children passed a more lethal infection on to their elders, indicating again that the primary role of flu vaccination is to cause individuals to pass more severe cases of COVID-19 to each other.  

The flu vaccinations have been aggressively pushed over the past decade, especially for the elderly. In May of 2019, I posted about topic (link). Of course, the propaganda push for COVID vaccinations has reached insane levels with all sorts of tricks being used to get people to step forward. Such tricks include:

• exaggerated or simply erroneous statistics as to what percentage of a population has received shots: any statistics relating to COVID-19 should be viewed with deep suspicion.
  
  
• fabricated shortage: if something is in short supply, it incites more interest because it becomes more desirable or there is a feeling that you may miss out if you don't seize on the first available opportunity
  
  
• fear-mongering and shaming: if you don't get the jab, your risk of dying from COVID-19 is much increased or so you would be led to believe. Alternatively, if you question the vaccine or the official narrative concerning the COVID-19 pandemic, then you have some kind of psychological flaw (and vague studies and doubtful polls will be adduced to confirm this).
  
  
• the carrot: if you have the jab, you'll be able to get back to work, meet with your friends and travel because the vaccination passport is coming and you'll be eligible for it.
  
  
• the stick: if you don't have the jab, you won't be able to get back to work, meet with your friends and travel because the vaccination passport is coming and you won't be eligible for it unless you get the jab

Vaccine Escape Mutants

Mutant varieties of the Covid-1984 virus seem to be emerging with great speed. Today, Tuesday 22nd December 2020, the BBC carried this headline:

Covid-19 pandemic: 

International alarm grows over new variant

In a BBC article the day before, the headline was:

New coronavirus variant: What do we know?

This second article concludes with the following:

Will the vaccines work against the new variant?

Almost certainly yes, or at least for now. All three leading vaccines develop an immune response against the existing spike, which is why the question comes up. Vaccines train the immune system to attack several different parts of the virus, so even though part of the spike has mutated, the vaccines should still work. "But if we let it add more mutations, then you start worrying," said Prof Gupta. "This virus is potentially on a pathway for vaccine escape, it has taken the first couple of steps towards that." Vaccine escape happens when the virus changes so it dodges the full effect of the vaccine and continues to infect people. This may be the most concerning element of what is happening with the virus. This variant is just the latest to show the virus is continuing to adapt as it infects more and more of us. A presentation by Prof David Robertson, from the University of Glasgow on Friday, concluded: "The virus will probably be able to generate vaccine escape mutants." That would put us in a position similar to flu, where the vaccines need to be regularly updated. Fortunately the vaccines we have are very easy to tweak.

"Almost certainly yes, or at least for now". Clearly, in the future the Covid vaccine will be recommended or mandated on at least a yearly basis in order to keep these "vaccine escape mutants" under control. The BBC is ramping up the fear factor and the UK government is busy locking down the country. The photo of Boris reinforces the belief that the country, along with most the world, has gone bonkers.

The phrase "vaccine escape mutants" reminds me of "teenage mutant ninja turtles" and there's no doubt that the MSM will be dramatising the former relentlessly as we transition to 2021. The vaccine will be trumpeted as humanity's only choice if it is to avoid extinction. It will be interesting to see in the coming year how far governments and employers are willing to impose Covid vaccination as a condition for travel and employment. Those who resist any such impositions will be effectively confined to their homes. If a Universal Basic Income is rolled out then proof of vaccination might be a requirement for accessing it. 

From a CBCNews Report of December 21st 2020, we learn that in the United States:

With the first doses of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine now being administered in the U.S., the federal government is giving employers around the country the green light to require immunisation for most workers. In general, companies have the legal right to mandate that employees get a COVID-19 shot, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) said Wednesday. More specifically, employers are entitled — and required — to ensure a safe workplace in which "an individual shall not pose a direct threat to the health or safety of individuals in the workplace." That can mean a company requiring its workforce to be vaccinated.

The second BBC article features a large artist's impression of the virus and nothing is every mentioned about the fact that the virus has never been isolated. However, the relentless display of an imaginary depiction of the virus reinforces the notion that it is real and dangerous and possibly heading straight for you. Figure 1 shows part of the BBC image.

Figure 1: the new face of terror

Summing things up nicely is this excellent article from the OffGuardian of December 7th 2020 that begins:

2020 was GloboCap Year Zero. The year when the global capitalist ruling classes did away with the illusion of democracy and reminded everyone who is actually in charge, and exactly what happens when anyone challenges them.

In the relatively short span of the last ten months, societies throughout the world have been transformed beyond recognition. Constitutional rights have been suspended. Protest has been banned. Dissent is being censored. Government officials are issuing edicts restricting the most basic aspects of our lives … where we can go, when we can go there, how long we are allowed to spend there, how many friends we are allowed to meet there, whether and when we can spend time with our families, what we are allowed to say to each other, who we can have sex with, where we have to stand, how we are allowed to eat and drink, etc. The list goes on and on.

The authorities have assumed control of the most intimate aspects of our daily lives. We are being managed like inmates in a prison, told when to eat, sleep, exercise, granted privileges for good behaviour, punished for the slightest infractions of an ever-changing set of arbitrary rules, forced to wear identical, demeaning uniforms (albeit only on our faces), and otherwise relentlessly bullied, abused, and humiliated to keep us compliant.

None of which is accidental, or has anything to do with any actual virus, or any other type of public health threat. Yes, before some of you go ballistic, I do believe there is an actual virus, which a number of people have actually died from, or which at least has contributed to their deaths … but there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever of any authentic public health threat that remotely justifies the totalitarian emergency measures we are being subjected to or the damage that is being done to society. Whatever you believe about the so-called “pandemic,” it really is as simple as that. Even if one accepts the official “science,” you do not transform the entire planet into a pathologised-totalitarian nightmare in response to a health threat of this nature.

COVID-19 or COVID-1984?

Here is a collection of images to make the case that COVID-1984 is more appropriate term, certainly in Australia where the images are taken from.

Figure 1: a group of more than two people on the beach!

Figure 2: you can't sit on a park bench!

Figure 3: Australian Defence Forces personnel help police clear the streets

Figure 4: police patrol Bondi Beach after it was closed to the public

Figure 5: police close the border between NSW and Queensland

Figure 6: don't try it!

So, Aussies!

Don't think you live in a police state?

THINK AGAIN

Figure 7: source

Insecurity in the Age of Pathogens

The lasting legacy of this current pandemic, or plandemic as some are calling it, on the general population will be a deep sense of insecurity. One day you have a job, the next you don't. One day you have a thriving small business, the next day you're staring at bankruptcy. The rapidity and scale of the global shutdown is without historical precedent.

The police and army seem largely unaffected by the pandemic. I haven't seen any statistics regarding infection rates for these two groups. Additionally, their jobs are secure. Police stations and army posts are not being closed down. Likewise, the jobs of government employees are secure. For persons working in private companies and businesses, jobs can be lost quickly in a pandemic. For example, take this headline from an article that appeared in the Evening Standard on March 16th 2020:

Virgin Atlantic asks staff to take eight weeks
of unpaid leave as it cuts 80% of flights 

For people working in the travel and hospitality industry, things will never be quite the same again. What if there's another pandemic, like COVID-19, next year? The world has been conditioned to the possibility of a pandemic for decades now. The seasonal flu has always been portrayed as the source of a possible pandemic if a particularly virulent strain should arise. The importance of getting your flu shot, as well as a host of other vaccines, has been heavily promoted. 

The spectre of the Spanish Flu of 1918 is always raised as proof of what might happen if we are not on guard. However in a pandemic, while individuals might sicken and die, the world would go on. At least that was the expectation. Now we know that's not the case. The world didn't go on. It stopped, and people lost their jobs or were stranded in foreign countries or on cruise ships. Many people's lives have been turned upside down. Figure 1 shows the death toll as of March 22nd 2020: 

Figure 1: source 

This is a tiny number by global standards. By contrast Figure 2 features an infographic concerning the impact of malaria: 

Figure 2: source 

It's unlikely that the deaths in 2020 from COVID-19 will match the death toll from Malaria. The latter of course is not a pandemic and is endemic in only certain parts of the world. The point is that there are many other illnesses that cause death rates far higher than the current virus and no lockdowns, global or even local, are enforced.

After COVID-19, people are going to be looking for more secure employment. Jobs that are perceived as "pandemic-resistant" will be in high demand. One possible scenario is that most small businesses collapse and are taken over by banks. The businesses however, continue with the owners being paid a salary by the banks. Everybody becomes an employee. As home owners default on their mortgages, banks take them over but people are allowed to continue living in them and paying a nominal rent. Nobody owns anything. Perceiving the vulnerability of workers during pandemic lockdowns, the government introduces a Universal Basic Income for everybody.

The governments and especially the central banks become all powerful. There is no paper money anymore. Your government-allotted income is credited to your bank account. On the pretext of tracing your previous contacts if you are found to be infected, it will be mandated that location-tracking apps be installed on mobile phones and these must be carried on your person when leaving your home. The penalty for not complying as always will be fines or imprisonment. 

So this is the bleak, cashless future. A future in which your location and purchases are constantly tracked. You, like nearly everyone else, works for the government and owns nothing. You are provided with a basic income and accommodation whether you work or not. You must comply with whatever the government tells you to do e.g. submit to vaccinations. As in Huxley's "Brave New World", you may be "happified" with a daily dose of "soma". This dystopia will be packaged and propagandised in a way that makes you feel grateful that you have such benevolent overlords.

Our overlords, having acquired the world's assets and with a militarised police force at their beck and call, will have achieved total control over their underlings (most of whom will have actively supported their enslavement). Decisions as to whether you are allowed to breed or even if you are allowed to live will be decided at their whim.

The Cull of Humanity

As the COVID-19 virus spreads in Indonesia, my feeling now is that it's real enough and clearly deadly to some. However, the spread of any virus amongst the general population is going to be limited as precautionary measures are put in place to limit its spread. Even with 90% mortality, a virus can only kill if it infects.

Despite the mild lethality of COVID-19, the fear factor is high and people, already conditioned to the necessity of vaccinations, will be lining up for the jab once a vaccine has been developed. If such vaccinations are made mandatory, and they can be made so under medical martial law, then the perfect vehicle for infecting all of mankind will be in place.

Let's assume COVID-19 was genetically engineered. It's likely that far more lethal varieties will be concocted in the future. Even so, without injections, the spread and mortality rate will be limited. If the global elite are seriously intent on reducing the population to 500 million people, then forced injection of the pathogen is the way to go.

The vaccine manufacturers do not have to disclose what's in the vaccines that they produce. It's not too far-fetched to imagine that there could be some intervention in the vaccine manufacturing process whereby an active and aggressive pathogen might be inserted. This might only happen to certain batches destined for particular countries or regions. The vast majority of the people involved in the manufacturing process would be need to be unaware of the addition of an active pathogen into the vaccine.

There's been mention made of how such a virus could be engineered to remain latent until activated by some external agent such as 5G signals. As the 5G networks roll out around the world, the death toll would rise and be attributed to the effects of a pathogen.

Fanciful? Perhaps, but the one certainty is that mandatory vaccinations provide a means to add an INGREDIENT X into the already toxic brew of ingredients that make up the modern vaccine and to thrust it deep into the bodies of any human on the planet.

The effect of that INGREDIENT X will be for our self-appointed overlords to determine. Perhaps such an ingredient has already been added to the existing flu vaccines. The push over the past twenty years to promote vaccinations and to intimidate and silence any opposition has been relentless. More recently, the push to implement 5G telecommunication networks has been similarly forceful. It's not too fanciful to suspect that the two might be interlinked in some way. Figure 1 shows a screenshot of a post that promotes this point of view:

Figure 1

Of course, the screenshot appeared in a BBC article titled Analysis: Conspiracy theorists link coronavirus to 5G and 'chemtrails' as an example of the sort of crazy ideas that are spreading online. It's interesting how Italy has emerged as a global hotspot for this virus. This country currently has ten vaccinations for children that are mandatory for school entry but there has been a strong push in recent years to make these vaccinations optional. This article from July 2018 gives some idea of the conflicting approaches:

Immunity fears as Italy abolishes requirement for parents to prove children have been vaccinated 

Italian state schools will no longer demand parents prove that their children have been vaccinated, the country’s new populist government has announced. Lega leader Matteo Salvini said he considered 10 vaccines - the amount Italian schoolchildren are required by law to have - to not only be useless, but potentially dangerous, in the run-up to the general election in March 2018. The new policy is likely to stoke fears that the coalition government, which also includes the Five Star Movement, may look to legislate other campaign promises which critics argue are not grounded in scientific proof.

My God. A politician stating that he thought that vaccines were useless and potentially dangerous. An anomaly to be sure and of course the government quickly backtracked and reinstated mandatory vaccinations. However, it's as if the country were being taught a lesson via COVID-29, specifically not to question the wisdom of vaccinations. In this scenario, the genetically engineered virus was released first in China and then later in Iran and Italy. See Figure 2.

Figure 2: source

Given the current isolation of Iran, the virus hasn't spread much from that country but Italy's geographical position ensured that the virus would spread to the rest of Europe. It would seem that countries like Italy that display "vaccine hesitancy" must be punished. I'm assuming that the United States developed and disseminated the bioweapon.

There are additional reasons why Italy may have targeted. As the Christian news site Gospa News states:

Italian Foreign Minister Luigi Di Maio with Iranian Minister
Mohammad Javad Zarif during a diplomatic meeting last year

The Italian ambassador to Iran, Giuseppe Perrone, met the Iranian minister for information and communication technologies, Azari Jahromi, on Tuesday, February 18, to increase bilateral cooperation between Italy and Iran in the field of artificial intelligence ... (and) in March 2019 Rome signed the preliminary agreements of the plan of commercial agreements with Beijing for the Silk Road.

The article goes on to explain the vaccine situation in Italy very clearly (it has been translated by Google from the original Italian so it reads a little strangely in parts):

... the Global Health Security Agenda (the international entity to which 40 countries adhere) in 2014 created an experimental health plan, desired by the American administration of President Barack Obama – a great friend of the Gates spouses he himself awarded for philanthropy – in which Italy has been identified for a pilot project of 10 mandatory vaccines, implemented by the Law Decree Lorenzin (110 of 31 July 2017), for children: i.e. anti-polio, anti-diphtheria, anti-tetanus, anti-hepatitis B , anti-pertussis, anti-Haemophilus influenzae type b, anti-measles, anti-rubella, anti-mumps, anti-chicken pox. 

The first three have been compulsory for decades in order to fulfill the compulsory schooling while the one against Hepatitis B, as highlighted in the previous reportage, became such after in 1991 the then Minister of Health Francesco De Lorenzo had received a bribe from 600 million old lire from SmithKline, subsequently absorbed by GSK which was commissioned to provide vaccines for the same Lorenzin Law, including the hexavalent one that many pediatricians consider very dangerous for children of a few years. 

This is why the spontaneous movement of the so-called NO-VAX has developed in Italy. This is why a beautiful pandemic may be the best solution to digest all the Italians the vaccines on which the same American-Zionist investment funds profit that speculate on the Arms Lobby and control the secret rooms of the NWO globalists and the Deep International State, the occult entity transversal to finance, freemasonry, politics and military intelligence apparatuses.

Getting back to the cull of humanity, it may sound crazy to suggest that a tiny group of influential people would cold-bloodedly set out to exterminate six sevenths of the world's population but then again the members of this group are crazy. Crazy in the sense that they believe they have the right to rule over the rest of us and regulate our numbers by culling in a manner similar to Australia's recent cull of feral camels. Apparently they were drinking too much water. In the view of our overlords, humans too are consuming too many of the world's precious resources and breathing out too much carbon dioxide. Most of them will have to go. 

Biotechnology and the New World Order

There's always interesting news items to be found at The Jerusalem Post. This morning, the content in one particular article from January 31st, 2019 caught my eye. 

A journalist, Hagay Hacohen, was attending a workshop in Tel Aviv hosted by Science Abroad, an organisation that "aims to make connections between Israeli scientists currently out of the country and present them with paths to return home and find meaningful work". 

During the lunch break, the journalist talks to various participants attending the workshop. It was one particular chat that caught my attention:

I return to the buffet table and seek out Elad Eliahoo, who pioneered a novel way to castrate cats without requiring an operation. 

Cats are among the most destructive species on the planet. This is not their fault; they’re furry predators humans favour and provide food and shelter to, and in warm countries, like Israel, street cats breed into fantastic figures and eat anything they can catch – whether mice or rare birds. 

Eliahoo was able to design a virus that carries an active component that causes the cat’s immune system to attack sex hormones, which means cats who get the shot do not go into heat and do not reproduce. Not only that, he adds, but the virus affects only the cat it was injected into and is highly unlikely to travel to other species. 

This blows my mind. Scientists, like Eliahoo, are currently able to hijack an immune system, give it commands, and design a delivery system for it. In theory, one could design such a virus to sterilise a specific community or to kick in if cells even begin to signal they are on the way to becoming a cancer cell.

Eliahoo explains that the shot is cheaper and easier to use than capturing cats, operating on them, and releasing them in the same spot, but my mind is at a different point by now. I’m thinking about the cat-sterilising virus getting out of hand and wiping out other species, such as humans. 

Eliahoo gives me a highly patient look and explains that “the virus is not going to complete its life cycle, because we removed huge chunks of its genetic sequence so it can’t reproduce. To regain these chunks, the virus will have to find another virus and take them off it, which is so unlikely to be almost nil.” 

I use the classic line spoken by Jeff Goldblum in Jurassic Park (1993): “Life finds a way.” Eliahoo thinks about that for a moment, and then shares with me that vaccines against rabies are already given to feral animals using just such a mechanism.

This was the first I had heard of such a virus. If it is effective, then the implications are chilling if one believes the global elite are intent on reducing the population of the planet to around 500 million people. If a similar virus targeting humans was engineered, it could be easily added to the aggressively promoted annual flu vaccinations that many people receive.

Inscription on the Georgia Guidestones

There's no information I can find about this virus. There is a product called Calchlorin described by the PARSEMUS FOUNDATION as:

A low-cost nonsurgical neuter shot for male dogs, cats, and other animals ... not patented and thus available in the U.S. and every country with access to the two ingredients (calcium chloride dihydrate, and pharmaceutical-grade or food-grade pure ethyl alcohol). Can be ordered by veterinarians from a reputable compounding pharmacy ... or can be prepared under sterile conditions.

There is little incentive for this product to be promoted because veterinarians profit mightily from surgical castration. The "holy grail" of birth control for dogs and cats must target females and this is what Elad Eliahoo's cat virus purports to do. So why no news?

Elad Eliahoo works at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and is currently involved in three major research projects (source):

1. the association between animal welfare and the reproductive system, including the development of non-surgical sterilisation methods; 
2. improving reproductive health and fertility in dairy cows; 
3. investigating human prenatal placenta conditions such as foetal growth restriction and preeclampsia, via relevant animal models, as well as by in-vitro and ex-vivo approaches.

Maybe it's simply too early in his research and more work needs to be done. However, such a virus would likely not be well received by veterinarians as it would reduce their revenue. More significantly, it would cause a general unease in the population. As the journalist asked of Elad Eliahoo, can the virus spread to humans? The more conspiratorial would ask: is such a virus being developed for humans? It wouldn't be long before someone suggested that the virus was being secretly incorporated into vaccines in an attempt to depopulate the planet or reduce the fertility of certain ethnic groups.

It would be better to suppress news about the virus completely and continue work on it in secret, especially the development of a virus that targets human reproduction. If such a virus were developed then it would be an effective bioweapon that could be delivered using the Trojan Horse of vaccinations, especially flu vaccines that target the young and healthy. Such crazy thinking is unlikely to find its way into mainstream media.

The global elite will not be getting flu shots or if they do, they will be different from what the sheeple receive. It will be interesting to see whether news of this "infertility virus" makes it into the mainstream or whether a blanket of silence descends upon it. Any secret biotechnology research by Israel is to be viewed with suspicion and maybe this casual disclosure by a prominent researcher to an enquiring journalist is all that will ever surface of this virus. Meanwhile:

Beyond the Zika Freakout

In this post, I've included a timely video that discusses the media hype surrounding the Zika virus, the latest virus in a long list of nasties that generate a level of concern not commensurate with the actual damage caused. It would be naive in the extreme to believe that international bodies such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) are concerned with the welfare of humanity or that they care about YOU. Any pronouncements by WHO and similar organisations, either national or international, about Zika or any other virus should be treated with skepticism. 

Ask yourself: what is the hidden agenda? In every case, Big Pharma certainly profits from marketing vaccines that governments then push onto largely unsuspecting publics, aided by propaganda from main stream media (MSM) outlets. From a broader perspective however, these scare campaigns generate a sense that the world is a dangerous place where potentially devastating microorganisms lurk in the shadows waiting their time to mutate, propagate and depopulate. Are bird flu, Ebola, Zika etc. just trial runs for the "big one" that is being deliberately bio-engineered, will be covertly disseminated and, because of its lethality, used as justification for mandatory, emergency vaccination of "the herd". 

Racing against the clock, brave scientists will develop this emergency vaccine but have no time to conduct thorough safety checks. Tragically, its effect of the concocted vaccine proves far more lethal than the concocted virus it is meant to combat. The herd of humanity is catastrophically culled from 7 billion to well under 1 billion. Of course, those in the know, receive a different vaccine that is harmless and nearly all of them survive whereas the bulk of humanity perishes. Life goes on, for some. Is this insane speculation? Maybe, but remember the world is run by psychopaths who would not lose a night's sleep over such a cull. In fact, they would probably sleep more soundly, believing that the world was a better place as a result.

Here is the video: