Chinese Covid Vaccines

This article from The New York Times really woke me up to the fact that China is not using an mRNA vaccine against Covid-19.

To quote from the article: "Unlike traditional vaccines that use an inactivated virus to trigger a response by the immune system, mRNA vaccines use a genetic molecule that assists cells to make proteins that can set off an immune response in the body. This response creates antibodies that are then used to fight the virus."

It's clear from the article that this is a deliberate policy. The government has had the opportunity to manufacture them but have not done so. Again, to quote, "It wasn’t that long ago that China appeared ready to introduce an mRNA vaccine for Covid-19. Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical, BioNTech’s Chinese partner, told investors last year that regulators would approve its mRNA vaccine for use in China by July 2021. The company, which had conducted clinical trials in late 2020, said that it could make as many as a billion doses a year. That optimism has since faded. Chinese authorities now say they are still reviewing documents in order to “make a final decision on the approval of our vaccine,” a spokeswoman for BioNTech said."

The above graphic and this article from July 30th 2021 is informative as to what other countries are using the Chinese vaccines:

Malaysia and Thailand announced this month that they were phasing out the vaccine. While the former will switch to Pfizer and give out its remaining Chinese shots as second immunizations, the latter is going one step further by offering mix and match vaccines with AstraZeneca to those which are still awaiting their second Sinovac shot. Both Thailand and Indonesia have said they will offer a third booster shot to those who have received the Sinovac vaccine. Both will use a different vaccine than Sinovac for this program. Singapore meanwhile does not count Sinovac recipients – many of them healthcare workers - in vaccination statistics anymore and does not exempt them from being tested, for example when attending events ... Sinovac has been widely used in Asia and countries like Cambodia and the Philippines are sticking to it so far despite some protests. Sinovac and another Chinese vaccine, Sinopharm, are also in use in South America, Mexico and the Middle East. Several countries in Africa have also authorized one or more Chinese shots, according to Our World in Data.

State of Play

I’ve not made an alternative news post for quite some time, mainly out profound disillusionment with the state of the world. However, it’s time to take stock and assess the state of play in the world today. Brendon O’Connell, whom I follow on YouTube, feels that the tide has turned and that the USA is finally asserting itself and confronting the forces that seek to undermine it. Brendon thinks that Putin was lured into attacking Ukraine in the expectation that the country would offer little resistance. However, with NATO and United States support, Ukraine has pushed back and Putin’s plan to take the country has been thwarted. I don’t see it that way at all.

In my mind, Putin was very much following a script he had been given. If he had really wanted to take over Ukraine, he could have done so easily but instead he dithered on the border for quite some time before attacking and even then only half-heartedly. The purpose of the invasion was to disrupt the supply of grain to the outside world and to drive up the price of natural gas. The Chinese lockdowns had already seriously disrupted the world’s supply chains and so the Ukraine invasion exacerbated an already bad situation. Russia and China have adequate food but not so the rest of the world.

Rising prices of all commodities around the world are driving more individuals and small businesses into bankruptcy and this is very much in line with Agenda 2030 where individuals are envisaged as owning nothing and being happy. More and more wealth will flow to the already wealthy while the 99% sink into neofeudalism. Russia and China are playing the long game. The former has become a global pariah and the latter seems to be shooting itself in the foot with its lockdowns and incessant testing but both countries can ride out the storm that will engulf the world and, with ample gold reserves, are well-positioned to benefit from the new global currency that will replace the ailing US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

I think both Russia’s Putin and China’s Xi are both doing what the City of London and the European banking cartel have instructed them to do. Their actions are bringing the world to its knees but in the long term their countries will emerge stronger and part of a trading block that will include Iran and Pakistan and perhaps other countries. Putin must have known that his invasion of Ukraine would drive countries like Finland and Sweden into the arms of NATO. That is the intention of the global elite who are playing this chess game. Tension between Russia and its European neighbours and between China and its southeast Asian neigbours is vital to maintain arms sales and keep global citizens in a state of apprehension.

Organisations such as the WHO and WEF will dominate nation states, dictating policies that all nation states must follow or suffer the consequences. In the next year or so, as the economies of more countries implode, the level of indebtness to the IMF and World Bank will soar and economic independence will plummet. Even more so than now, politicians will simple follow instructions issued by their overlords and individuals will suffer helplessly as each country’s police enforce the implementation of these instructions. For example, the WHO may declare another pandemic and issue instructions regarding vaccines, lockdowns etc. that the politicians in each country must implement, having signed the pandemic treaty.

Brendon seems to have succumbed to a Q-Anon type of delusion, wherein he anticipates that the United States will be great again and live up to the ideals of its founding fathers. He sees the country as the only one with a real committment to individual freedom and, if it loses its superpower status, we are all doomed to live in smart city gulags under constant surveillance and our freedom of movement dependent on our social credit score. He hopes that the United States has realised that it has been compromised by a foreign power (Israel) and take appropriated action, including occupation of Palestine. This to me seems unrealistic.

However, there is an growing awareness within the United States that its partnership with Israel has benefited only the latter. Whether it generates enough momentum to cause a foreign policy reassessment is doubtful. It seems that the US is breaking apart and that the goal of Israel, to weaken the country and promote migration of wealthy or talented Jews to Israel, is well underway.

The End Goal

Mother/Android is not a great film by any means but the plot twist in it is memorable (spoiler alert). It's hinted at in something that the android said after helping the mother. In the following dialog, the mother still thinks the android is human:

Android: But you need to get with the program here. They're not butlers anymore. They're killing machines. And they've jumped the evolutionary chain. They've hacked our programming and they'll use it against us until we're all dead.

Mother: "Hacked our programming", what do you mean? We're not robots, you can't hack us.

Android: Love. I know it sounds dumb but that what it is. Human beings are programmed through hormones and primal urges to have emotional connections. It's what kept us alive this long. Parents, spouses, children. But an android doesn't have that. An android is expendable. They don't have self-preservation and they'll sacrifice themselves and others if it brings them closer to their goal. They can reason past sentiment and emotional bond. It's love. Love makes us selfish. Love will kill us all.  

Mother: I can't leave him to die.

Android: You wanna live?

Mother: Of course.

Android: Save yourself. That's what they would do. They have strategy like you wouldn't believe"

The last line is the most telling: "They have strategy like you wouldn't believe". It's the strategy that takes the mother's breath away when she finally realises that the android has played her big time.  The twist struck a chord with me because I was reminded of the grand chessboard and the game being played by the members of the global elite, a game designed to bring them closer to their goal.

"They'll sacrifice themselves and others if it brings them closer to their goal". There is a similarity between androids, psychopaths and true believers: "they can reason past sentiment and emotional bond". Not all members of the global elite are psychopaths but those who are not are true believers who believe in the goal of a technocratic world in which everyone and everything is monitored and controlled. 

This technocratic elite, whether driven by true belief or the psychopathic love of power, are masterful strategists whose tactical moves can divert and confuse us if we lose sight of the big picture (something that they never do). For example, the dream of global governance demands the subservience of nation states and yet the puppet leaders of those very nation states can at times be encouraged, prodded or blackmailed into defiance of international norms by their puppet masters.

With Russia  and Ukraine, the former serves as an example of what a rogue nation state can get up if not properly controlled by an overarching global government. The villain, Russia, is the target of unrelenting main stream media attacks but villains are carefully chosen. The egregious invasion of other countries by the United States, with Israel pulling the strings of its leaders, does not qualify it for villain status. Thus the current vilification of Russia is tactical and Putin has certainly not embarked on his current adventures without getting the nod from his superiors.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict will disrupt global supply chains even further, undermine trust in the US dollar as a reserve currency, increase inflation and move the world closer to a global digital currency. It seems to be phase 2 of the Great Reset, with the "plandemic" being Phase 1. It will be interesting to see how Putin emerges from the current conflict. It's certain he has been promised much in terms of long term compensation but he may well be sacrificed if necessary.

What's conspicuously absent from the global strategy of the technocrats is love. "Human beings are programmed through hormones and primal urges to have emotional connections. It's what kept us alive this long. Parents, spouses, children." The technocrats, like the androids in the movie, don't have that. The family is an impediment to their dream of total control and they must do all they can to undermine and destroy it. So far, they have been doing a good job.

Perhaps when the android says that "love will kill us all", he is speaking about his own species. Love will certainly eventually triumph over the global elite. In the meantime, it is important not to be deceived by polarising propaganda spewing forth from mainstream media sources. 

ADDENDUM

The day after I created this post, I came across the following quote:

“They fear love because it creates a world they can't control.” 

George Orwell, 1984

It fitted in so well with the content of this post that I thought I'd add it in. There is even a pictorial version. See  Figure 1.

Figure 1

Given that I had a digital copy of 1984, I thought I'd look up the quote and see in what context it appeared. A search for the sentence or even part of it came up blank. The quote seems to appear about the middle of 2021 and keeps getting recycled without any due diligence as to its provenance. Interesting. It just shows how misinformation can proliferate. In this case, it's quite harmless but the lesson is that you should always check your sources.

On Being Sane In Insane Places

In 2021, I made 38 posts to this blog and that translates to slightly more than 3 posts per month. So far, as the middle of February 2022 approaches, I've made only a single post: BISHOP RICHARD WILLIAMSON. Why so?

First up, you have to be careful what you say. The following February 9th 2022 article reporting on a DHS (Department of Homeland Security) announcement presages clearly what's coming:

DHS warns against mistrust of US government in latest terror bulletin

​The Department of Homeland Security’s latest terrorism threat bulletin includes a warning against “the proliferation of false or misleading narratives, which sow discord or undermine public trust in U.S. government institutions.”

The bulletin, issued Monday and in effect until at least June 7, blamed an “online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis-, dis- and mal-information introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors.

“These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence,” DHS went on. “Mass casualty attacks and other acts of targeted violence conducted by lone offenders and small groups acting in furtherance of ideological beliefs and/or personal grievances pose an ongoing threat to the nation.”

Before too long, simply questioning the official narrative may flag you as a terrorist in most countries of the world. Once social credit scores are in place, even seemingly mild criticisms of governments will cause you to lose points and just following certain people, groups or causes will negatively impact your score, even if you say nothing yourself. Right now, even quoting Government issued facts and figures, can lead to censorship on social media platforms (because it has not emanated from the government itself).

In such a climate, as already exists in China at the moment, criticism of the government cannot be explicit or else there will be consequences. Resourceful citizens have created workarounds. For example, using images or references to Winnie the Pooh in place of Xi Jinping worked for a while until the CCP clamped down. See Figure 1.

Figure 1: source

So, to connect to the title of this post, it is humour (or humor as the Americans say) that can help one to remain sane in insane places (and the whole world is an insane place today). Cartoons have always been a popular means of lampooning politicians. While composing this post, I suddenly thought of a clever modification of the well-known triple j logo in Australia. Figure 2 shows what I came up with:

Figure 2

I posted this to Facebook with the comment:

I couldn't resist creating this. Non-Australians may not have heard of triple j but most Aussies have. Should my modification of triple j's logo be interpreted as promoting public health or as taking the piss out of government directives?

PS: it's telling that 17 hours later the post has a mere 4 likes with no comments whatsoever. So much for stimulating debate.

An important aspect of humour is that it's not too in your face. The graphic in Figure 2 can be taken at face value or it can be seen as sarcasm. It's in the eye (or the mind) of the beholder. In the future, if criticism of government is to survive, it will need to be nuanced and double-edged.

A second reason for my paucity of posts is simply a sense of defeatism. Why bother? When you realise you are sane in an insane place, it is tempting to just give up and keep quiet. Creating a disturbance in the insane asylum will not make your stay any more pleasant.

Whether this blog will survive or not is questionable. It began on November 20th 2015 with a post about The Corbett Report that I'd only just discovered. In 2016 I made four posts:

• New Polio Vaccine in April
• The Hidden Agenda Behind Free Trade Agreements in May
• Steemit and Beyond the Zika Freakout in September

After that the blog gathered momentum with an average of 32 posts per year over the next five years (2017 to 2021). Maybe I should read back over these past posts in order to remind myself where I've come from and thus help me get some idea of where I might be headed.

Looking back to the middle of 2015 when I retired and before I started this blog, my only contact with alternative media had been via discursive viewing of YouTube videos on various topics such as 9/11, the death of Diana etc. I had this to say about James Corbett in my very first post:

In my quest for alternative media sources, I recently stumbled upon The Corbett Report's YouTube channel and watched several of the videos there. I was impressed. He expresses himself very clearly and logically with supporting documentation taken largely from publicly accessible, verifiable sources.

It's only since becoming acquainted with Brendon O'Connell that I've had to admit my naiveté concerning James Corbett. He has been dubbed "Tokyo Rose" by Brendon who regards him as controlled opposition. Banished from YouTube, James has become a dominant and widely respected figure in alternative media circles. While he has an annoyingly didactic and condescending style of speaking, I still enjoy watching his content. 

The powers-that-be recognise the need to create spaces where those who are disaffected with and disbelieving of the mainstream narrative can gather and vent their spleen. These places become echo chambers where nothing much happens and the discontent is contained, not disrupting the roll out of Agenda 2030. 

It's not that James has signed a contract to become a member of the controlled opposition. Instead, he operates within certain boundaries. There are lines that he dare not cross. His reward is that he lives a comfortable lifestyle in the "sunny climes of Western Japan". Were he to bring up topics like Israel's control of cybersecurity or the secret deal between Iran and Israel or the real implications of the belt and road initiative, he would find that the flow of funds would quickly dry up and somebody else, more compliant, would be promoted to take his place.

David Icke, Alex Jones and others are also controlled opposition, attracting a certain demographic and creating their own echo chambers where there's a lot of froth and fury but little action that would disrupt the "Agenda". While I can still watch James Corbett, I can't stomach watching Icke or Jones or most of the other controlled opposition personalities. I enjoy "New World Next Week" in which he teams up with James Evan Pilato. The latter is more inclined to cross boundaries but has learned to keep his tongue in check most of the time, although he clearly has lapses and even mentions "Israel" from time to time!

BISHOP RICHARD WILLIAMSON

I was surprised today to come across a Catholic priest denouncing the mainstream narrative regarding the Holocaust. Here is a link to the video on BitChute. The priest's name is Bishop Richard Williamson and the text accompanying the video provides some brief details regarding him:

Richard Nelson Williamson (born 8 March 1940) is an English traditionalist bishop formerly in communion with the Catholic Church who opposes the changes in the church brought about by the Second Vatican Council. He was originally a member of the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX). He was subsequently excommunicated; this was lifted in 2009. Williamson was convicted in German courts of denying the Holocaust and incitement related to those views. He incurred a latae sententiae excommunication in 2015 for consecrating a bishop without the pope's approval. Due to other actions, Williamson was expelled from the SSPX in 2012.

The text is an excerpt from the Wikipedia article about him. In that article we learn that "Williamson, originally an Anglican, was received into the Catholic Church in 1971" and that "Williamson is fluent in English, French, German and Spanish". 

I've discovered that E. Michael Jones has written a book titled "L'affaire Williamson: The Catholic Church and Holocaust Denial" that is available on Amazon. The description of the book is as follows:

Within minutes of the leaking on the internet of the announcement that the Catholic Church was going to lift the excommunications of four Society of St. Pius X bishops, reports that one, Bishop Richard Williamson, was a “Holocaust denier” began circulating on the web as well. These reports relied on an interview of the bishop conducted months before in Germany but scheduled to be broadcast the following day on Swedish TV.

Despite Vatican efforts, news reports kept confusing the Church’s focus on the sin of schism with the media world’s focus on the unforgivable secular sins, i.e., “Holocaust denial” and anti-Semitism. Why?

Holocaust denial is another word for Jewish control of discourse, in particular historical discourse about World War II. A historian who publishes something a powerful Jew, which is to say a Jew with powerful backers, dislikes, will be punished. If he lives by writing books, as David Irving did, the Deborah Lipstadt brigade will get him blacklisted in the publishing industry. If he is a professor, the big Jews will try to get him fired, as Deborah Lipstadt did in the case of Professor David O’Connell.

Typical is the case of Norman Finkelstein, who was fired from his job at DePaul University in Chicago. Finkelstein wrote a devastating critique of Alan Dershowitz’s book The Case for Israel so Dershowitz set out to destroy Finkelstein’s career. The fact that Finkelstein was a Jew didn’t matter. The big Jews, in this case Dershowitz, decide who is to live and who is to die in academe and publishing.

In L'affaire Williamson: The Catholic Church and Holocaust Denial, E. Michael Jones, editor of Culture Wars magazine, describes and defies the artificial rules that control discourse, exposing fissions within society and the Church.

E. Michael Jones

The New Normal and Depopulation

Figure 1: Amazon Link

On timtruth.com's channel on Bitchute, I just watched an interesting video that used gematria to highlight the links between the phrase "the new normal" and the word "depopulation". Both have exactly twelve letters, with six in common and six different. This is shown below:

• the new normal - twelve letters with six in common with "depopulation" in bold
• the letters h, e, w, n, r, m and l are not shared
• depopulation - twelve letters with six in common with "the new normal" in bold
• the letters d, p, p, u, i and o are not shared

Figure 2: link

The blog's author used the site Gematrinator to show the similarities between the two. I've used this site myself and have referred to it an earlier blog post (link): Figures 3 and 4 show his findings.

Figure 3: Gematria of The New Normal

Figure 4: Gematria of Depopulation

On Gematrinator there are many systems that can be used but English Ordinal is the most straightforward. See Figure 5.

Figure 5: English Ordinal Chart

Using this system, both "the new normal" and "depopulation" total 148:

• the new normal = 20+8+5+14+5+23+14+15+18+13+1+12 = 148 
• depopulation = 4+5+16+15+16+21+12+1+20+9+15+14 = 148

Reverse Ordinal simply switches the order the letters so that Z has value 1 and A has value 26. See Figure 6.

Figure 6: English Reverse Ordinal Chart

In this system, both "the new normal" and "depopulation" total 176:

• the new normal = 7+19+22 + 13+22+4 + 13+12+9+14+26+15 = 176
• depopulation = 23+22+11+12+11+6+15+26+7+18+12+13 = 176

Full Reduction means that all numbers are reduced to single digits, thus Z=26 --> 8. See Figure 7.

Figure 7: Full Reduction Chart

In this system, both "the new normal" and "depopulation" total 58:

• the new normal = 2+8+5 + 5+5+5 + 5+6+9+4+1+3 = 58
• depopulation = 4+5+7+6+7+3+3+1+2+9+6+5 = 58

Reverse Full Reduction means that order of the letters shown in Figure 6 are reversed so that A now has value 8 and Z has value 1. See Figure 8.

Figure 8: Reverse Full Reduction Chart

In this system, both "the new normal" and "depopulation" total 59:

• the new normal = 7+1+4 + 4+4+4 + 4+3+9+5+8+6 = 59
• depopulation = 5+4+2+3+2+6+6+8+7+9+3+4 = 59

What makes this video all the more interesting in that the author has written a program to examine the probability of such a matching of numbers using four different systems. What he found was a probability of about 0.08% or less than 8 occurrences by chance every 10,000.

It's correspondence is probably deliberate given how the psychopathic elite like to play with numbers and flaunt their dominion over us via hidden taunts like this.

Panic Stations

The WHO never rests because the battle against pathogens is never ending. An interesting article appeared in IFLSCIENCE on November 3rd 2021 with the title:

Vaccine Urgently Needed For Bacteria Killing 

150,000 Babies Annually, WHO Reports

In this post, I'll dissect the article and add some comments. It begins:

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has called for the development of a vaccine against Group B streptococcus (GBS), a common bacteria implicated in the deaths of around 150,000 babies each year.

This translates to:

PROBLEM: GBS is killing 150,000 babies per year

REACTION: How can we prevent these deaths?

SOLUTION: A vaccine must be developed

We'll return to this problem, reaction, solution in a moment. The article goes on to highlight the dangerous nature of this pathogen.

In their report, issued November 2, the WHO revealed the global burden of GBS is much higher than previously thought. As well as the aforementioned alarming number of newborn deaths, the bacterium is also linked to over half a million preterm births and at least 46,000 stillbirths a year – though the real numbers are likely even higher, as there are significant data gaps around the total burden of death and disease.

“This new research shows that Group B strep is a major and under-appreciated threat to newborn survival and wellbeing, bringing devastating impacts for so many families globally. WHO joins partners in calling for urgent development of a maternal GBS vaccine, which would have profound benefits in countries worldwide,” Dr Phillipp Lambach, Medical Officer from WHO’s Immunisation, Vaccines and Biologicals department, and report author, said in a statement.

Now comes the kicker. We learn the GBS is "harmless" and forms part of the microbiome of about 15% of mothers giving birth. 

GBS is harmless for most who carry it. An average of 15 percent of pregnant people – nearly 20 million per year – carry the bacterium in their vagina. While this is usually asymptomatic, GBS can pass to babies during pregnancy, childbirth, or in the early weeks of life, which can be extremely serious. The bacterium is linked to neonatal and newborn meningitis and sepsis, both of which can be fatal, and can result in neuro-developmental impairment and congenital defects.

However, these mothers can pass the bacteria on to their babies before, during and after birth. One might expect that the mother's immunity to the deleterious effects of GBS would be passed on to her child. Given half a chance this might happen but medical intervention will ensure that this probably does not happen. The article explains that:

Currently, antibiotic therapy is used to treat cases in infants and parents. Antibiotics are also used as a precaution to prevent GBS and are administered during labor to parents in whom the bacterium has been detected. However, the risk still remains high.

“Prevention of early onset GBS is possible in countries where it is policy,” Professor Joy Lawn, Director of the Maternal Adolescent Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH) Centre at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and contributor to the report told IFLScience. “However, even with high use of GBS test and treat in pregnancy, GBS stillbirths and GBS-associated preterm birth will not be likely to be prevented by antibiotics.”

So we learn that a test has been devised to detect this "harmless" pathogen that can easily turn deadly and a positive test means that a course of antibiotics is administered to the expectant mother, ensuring that her microbiome is devastated before giving birth.

Where does GBS take its highest toll? We learn that:

This is the case across the world, but particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where the burden of GBS was the greatest. In sub-Saharan Africa, for example, rates of maternal GBS are the highest in the world – accounting for almost half of the global burden. Eastern and South-Eastern Asia are also disproportionally affected.

In other words, GBS strikes in those countries where sanitation and nutrition is poorest. Here we might reframe our previous problem, reaction, solution:

PROBLEM: GBS is killing 150,000 babies per year in low and middle income countries

REACTION: How can we prevent these deaths?

SOLUTION: Let's improve sanitation, nutrition and the health infrastructure of these countries.

Of course, this is never a solution in the eyes of the WHO. The current solution of administering antibiotics is not a big money spinner and so the inevitable is proposed:

A preventative maternal vaccine, therefore, is urgently needed, the WHO says. Several candidates are in the pipeline, but none are available yet, despite almost 40 years of work.

“The idea for a maternal GBS vaccine was suggested about 4 decades ago, but is only in the last decade that more progress has been made,” Prof. Lawn told IFLScience.

Boosting natural immunity is never an option. Where potential pathogens are involved, a vaccine must be sought and it seems that one or more of them are nearly here.

“One hexavalent [six-in-one] vaccine is entering phase 3 trials in humans... Then following is a protein based one.” A few, including an mRNA vaccine, are in pre-clinical trials, she added.

The miracle that is modern medicine may soon produce an mRNA vaccine to combat GBS. Given the devastating effects of this bacterium, the vaccine may well receive emergency approval before the trials are even concluded. It may well be administered to all expectant mothers, just in case. It may well be mandated for any woman entering hospital to give birth. We learn that the benefits are financial as well:

Promising as this is, the report highlights the urgency of the situation and calls for vaccine developers and funders to accelerate the development of a safe and effective GBS vaccine. An estimated 50,000 GBS-related deaths, as well as over 170,000 preterm births, could be prevented every year if said vaccine reached 70 percent of pregnant people. The benefits would not only be health-focused but also financial – the report claims that between $1 billion and $17 billion could be saved worldwide from just a year of maternal GBS vaccination.

No mention of the profits to Big Pharma of course. These vaccines are being developed for the benefit of humanity, to save the babies. Anyone who questions their administration is clearly a monster. The article concludes:

“A new maternal vaccine against GBS would be a game-changer in the reduction of newborn and maternal deaths for the most affected countries,” Dr Martina Lukong Baye, Coordinator of the National Multisector Programme to Combat Maternal, Newborn & Child Mortality at the Ministry of Public Health in Cameroon, said. “We plead to all stakeholders to treat this as a matter of moral priority.”

Wow, so it's a moral priority to develop a vaccine that can be administered to pregnant women. It's not hard to understand the game being played here and yet it will be almost impossible to stop it. Big Pharma will aggressively promote it, Big Medicine will enthusiastically embrace it, and Big Media will sing its praises. Big Government may even mandate it.

This is just another example of the medical madness that has overtaken global health. Confusingly, GBS is also an acronym not only for Group B streptococcus but also for Guillain-Barré syndrome, a known side-effect of the Covid mRNA vaccines. In any case, once again we have a manufactured crisis with a pre-planned solution.