Mammon

Mark Moss posted an interesting video on his YouTube channel. It was titled Ukraine War Outcome Decided By JP Morgan? and made mention of the interesting fact that the first Central Bank of England was established in 1694:

The Bank of England was incorporated by act of Parliament in 1694 with the immediate purpose of raising funds to allow the English government to wage war against France in the Low Countries (see War of the Grand Alliance). A royal charter allowed the bank to operate as a joint-stock bank with limited liability. Source.

Remarkable to reflect on the fact that the first Central Bank in the United States was not established until 1913, more that two centuries later. It was all downhill from there for humanity.

Mammon: The Demon of Greed
Source

Let's recall that King James 11 was deposed in 1688 and King William and Queen Mary from Orange took over in 1689. This was a major transformation of the English nobility that preceded the creation of the Bank of England. This seems to have signaled the shift in the financial centre of gravity of Europe from the Low Countries to England, just as it shifted from Spain to the Low Countries in the early 16th century.

The 18th Century certainly marked the rise of England and the decline of the Netherlands. A largely Catholic France challenged England throughout the century but the French Revolution and the subsequent defeat of Napoleon finished that country's hopes of global dominance. In the 19th Century, the financial dominance of Great Britain was unopposed although as the century progressed, the unification of Prussia and the German States under Bismarck saw Germany emerge as a potential threat. 

Germany served the banksters well in the 20th Century. With the establishment of the US Fed in 1913, the financial centre of gravity began to shift again. Mark Moss in his video makes no mention of the Zionists and wisely so as he doesn't want to see his channel banned or demonetized. However, their influence was crucial in shaping the events of the 20th Century and in establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

The Oxford Dictionary defines Mammon as follows:

... wealth regarded as an evil influence or false object of worship and devotion. It was taken by medieval writers as the name of the devil of covetousness, and revived in this sense by Milton: "others have forsaken Mammon in search of something on a more spiritual plane"

As Jesus said, you cannot serve God and Mammon. It is those worshipers of Mammon who are behind the wars that have plagued humanity over the past few centuries and they continue to do so to the present day.

Medieval theologians assigned seven archdemons to the seven deadly sins, and Mammon became the demon of greed. Similarly, Mammon was also sometimes conflated with the Greek god Plutus and depicted as the seductive god of riches. Famous personifications of mammon are found in Ben Jonson’s The Alchemist, John Milton’s Paradise Lost, and Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene. The word eventually gained a secular connotation as an all-consuming pursuit of wealth and was often used in critiques of capitalism or of wealthy individuals. Source.

In an earlier post about The Khazarian Mafia, I outlined the shadowy origins of the people who now run the world. They are the worshipers of Mammon and currently God seems to be in retreat. This of course only seems to be the case. A backlash is growing and many will forsake Mammon in search of a more spiritual plane. 

The Secret History of Britain

A friend put me onto Stephen Oppenheimer who has an alternative take on the history of British migration and settlement, namely that "everything you know about British and Irish ancestry is wrong. Our ancestors were Basques, not Celts. The Celts were not wiped out by the Anglo-Saxons, in fact neither had much impact on the genetic stock of these islands". Controversial stuff indeed. Wikipedia introduces him as follows:

Stephen Oppenheimer (born 1947) is a British paediatrician, geneticist, and writer. He is a graduate of Green Templeton College, Oxford and an honorary fellow of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine. In addition to his work in medicine and tropical diseases, he has published popular works in the fields of genetics and human prehistory. This latter work has been the subject of a number of television and film projects.

Of interest are the books he has written:

• Eden in the East
• The Real Eve (documentary and US book title) / Out of Eden (UK book title)
• Origins of the British

I've downloaded from this site, a six page PDF file that summarises his views about the origins of the British and have placed it in my e-library. His books are not available in the local library; however, they are available on Amazon. If what he says is true, then it's another example of the falsification of history in which fictions turn into facts. Here is a quote from the PDF file:

Many archaeologists still hold this view of a grand iron-age Celtic culture in the centre of the continent, which shrank to a western rump after Roman times. It is also the basis of a strong sense of ethnic identity that millions of members of the so-called Celtic diaspora hold. But there is absolutely no evidence, linguistic, archaeological or genetic, that identifies the Hallstatt or La Tène regions or cultures as Celtic homelands. The notion derives from a mistake made by the historian Herodotus 2,500 years ago when, in a passing remark about the "Keltoi," he placed them at the source of the Danube, which he thought was near the Pyrenees. Everything else about his description located the Keltoi in the region of Iberia. 

The late 19th-century French historian Marie Henri d'Arbois de Jubainville decided that Herodotus had meant to place the Celtic homeland in southern Germany. His idea has remained in the books ever since, despite a mountain of other evidence that Celts derived from southwestern Europe. For the idea of the south German "Empire of the Celts" to survive as the orthodoxy for so long has required determined misreading of texts by Caesar, Strabo, Livy and others. And the well-recorded Celtic invasions of Italy across the French Alps from the west in the 1st millennium BC have been systematically reinterpreted as coming from Germany, across the Austrian Alps. 

De Jubainville's Celtic myth has been deconstructed in two recent sceptical publications: The Atlantic Celts: Ancient People or Modern Invention by Simon James (1999), and The Celts: Origins, Myths and Inventions by John Collis (2003). Nevertheless, the story lingers on in standard texts and notably in The Celts, a Channel 4 documentary broadcast in February. "Celt" is now a term that sceptics consider so corrupted in the archaeological and popular literature that it is worthless. 

I'll keep an eye out for any of his books and they certainly of interest to seekers of truth in history. Here is a YouTube video, divided into two parts, in which Stephen Oppenheimer is talking about the British migration: