Alternative Media: iran

Showing posts with label iran. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 August 2026

Zionist Stooges

The following article reaffirms Brendon O'Connell's persistent claim that post-1979 Iran is a Western construct. It appears on this website but it first appeared in my Twitter feed.

Patrick O'Carroll - Ayatollah Khomeini Was a Zionist Agent

August 19, 2026

By 1978, Ruhollah Khomeini was in exile in the holy city Najaf, Iraq, from whence Saddam Hussein expelled him that same year.

In the newspaper Libération, Dominique Lorentz highlighted the fact that the Zionist West (specifically USA, France, and Britain) viewed Khomeini as a TOOL to destabilize or overthrow the Shah. Lorentz reported that the Western-Zio "intelligence" "services" relocated Khomeini to just outside Paris:

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/corrected-in-a-quiet-french-village-a-cleric-plotted-irans-revolution-idUSKCN1PP2OB/

Of course, this required the active complicity, or at least the explicit clearance, of the Zionist French Regime.

Next, all the major Zionist "intelligence" "services" and media transformed Khomeini's international image into that of a "Respectable Holy Man" whose political headquarters were now at Neauphle-Le-Château, 25 miles west of Paris.

Lorentz continued, "Having picked Khomeini to overthrow the Shah, [the Americans] had to get him out of Iraq, clothe him with respectability, and set him up in Paris, a succession of events which could not have occurred if the leadership in France had been against it". Source: James Perloff's 2009 article: https://www.nomullas.net/meettheshah.html

HOW THE ZIONISTS INSTALLED KHOMEINI

Anthony Parsons, British ambassador to Iran at the time, quoted the Shah, "If you lift up Khomeini's beard, you will find Made in England written under his chin".

Khomeini's "Islamic" "revolution" was instigated by the CIA, MI6, and French-intel with the goal of controlling Iran's energy.

This article explains how the Marxist-Fabian BBC (British Brainwashing Corporation) helped install the Ayatollah:

https://web.archive.org/web/20141024134410/http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/10123267/how_the_bbc_helped_bring_the_ayatollah_to_power/

In his 2007 book "The Secret War with Iran", Dr Ronen Bergman wrote: "Another propaganda tool for Khomeini was none other than the Persian-language broadcasts of the BBC. The channel gave him a platform. The regular broadcasts made him the 'unchallenged leader' of the Iranian revolutionary movement". On top of that, in his well-known Jan 1980 interview with David Frost, the Shah himself reconfirmed the BBC's crucial role in his overthrow.

In his 2004 book, "A Century of War", US historian F William Engdahl said the Carter Regime changed US policy toward Iran in 1978: "In Nov 1978, President Carter named the Bilderberg Group's George Ball, another Trilateral, to head a special White House Iran task-force under the National Security Council's [Trilateral] Brzezinski. Ball recommended that Washington drop support for the Shah of Iran and support the fundamentalist Islamic opposition of Ayatollah Khomeini. Robert Bowie from the CIA was one of the lead 'case officers' in the new CIA-led coup against the man their covert actions had placed in power 25 years earlier".

In his "Hostage to Khomeini" (1981), journalist Robert Dreyfuss wrote that, already in 1975, the Club of Rome, the Aspen Institute and other "elite" think-tanks began conspiring to remove the Shah and undo his modernization plans which they saw as a threat to their power and control over the region:

"In Sep 1975, the Aspen Institute held a symposium in Persepolis, Iran. The public side of the transactions was published years later under the title 'Iran: Past, Present and Future'.

In the behind-the-scenes discussion, the plans for reversing the Shah's industrialization program and for turning Iran into a model Dark Ages Regime were mapped out.

It is a bitter twist of history that the Shah and his wife, Empress Farah Diba, witlessly provided huge amounts of funding to the Aspen project.

Attending the Persepolis symposium were at least a dozen members of the Club of Rome, including its chairman, Aureho Peccei; Sol Linowitz of Coudert Brothers law-firm; Jacques Freymond of the Institute of International Studies in Geneva; and Robert O Anderson and Rarlan Cleveland, both Aspen Institute officials and associates of the Club of Rome in the USA ..."

Veteran "BBC World Affairs" editor John Simpson was with Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini onboard the historic Air France chartered flight, when he returned to Iran on 1 Feb 1979. But, many observers exposed John Simpson as a known MI6 agent.

"BBC World Affairs" is the core international "news" and geopolitical branch of BBC "News", so it is a virtual certainty that such an editor simply MUST be MI6, on-the-square, and "establishment to the hilt". So, an MI6 journalist accompanied Khomeini to Iran when he landed there after the Shah went into exile!

WHY THE ZIONISTS DITCHED THE SHAH

The Shah's nationalist policies made him more popular in Iran, and made his country more independent and more powerful. This of course worried the CIA and MI6. The TOP FIVE reasons why the Zionists deposed the Shah:

1. The Shah bought land from the upper classes and, along with the crown's own land, sold it back cheaply to tenant farmers. Between 1.5 and 2.5 million Iranian peasant families (representing about half of all rural village households or nearly 90% of sharecroppers) became landowners, thus ending the old feudal system.

2. The Shah allowed women the right to vote. He brought an end to the wearing of the veil.

3. The Shah developed plans for a 90-billion-USD nuclear-power program.

4. The Shah signed petroleum agreements with the Italian oil company Eni S.p.A.

5. The Shah began to shut down the opium industry which was created during the days of British influence.

Monday, 24 October 2022

Heading Where?

The drought of posts to this blog over the course of the year is quite startling:

It's not that I've lost interest in alternative news but I'm just not motivated to post. I understand what's going on and the reality is depressing.

The greatest misjudgement that casual observers of the world stage make is in their belief that politicians (especially presidents, premiers and prime ministers) are directing the course of world events. Nothing could be further from the truth. In the hierarchy of power, the politicians rank only the plebs and the police/army. They act out their assigned roles and if they stray too far from the script they are replaced by others who are more compliant.

Is Xi Jinping an exception to that rule? Given that modern China has been created by Western bankers, probably not. Xi's ruthless ascent to Mao-like status is the result of his own psychopathic scheming but now that he has assumed absolute control it is reasonable to assume that his handlers are happy about this and about the direction in which he is steering China.

So where is he steering the country? In this regard, it's helpful to pursue the similarity between Mao and Xi. Mao could have been prevented from taking control of China if Chiang Kai-shek been given sufficient support. The global elite wanted a Communist China in order to exacerbate international tensions. Even after Mao came to power, he was not anti-West but his overtures of conciliation with the West were rebuffed.

Instead the Korean War was concocted by the globel elite shortly after the revolution. The Russians were supporting North Korea and when South Korea invaded and swept toward the Chinese border it was to be expected that a nervous and newly created Chinese government would react. This was an opportunity for the United Nations to intervene militarily but only if the Soviets didn't veto the move. The Soviet ambassador to the UN didn't show up for the vote and so UN intervention was on.

When the dust settled, things were territorially the same as before but with an enormous loss of life on both sides of the conflict. This of course is never a concern for people with their hands on the levers of power. The point was that the UN had intervened successfully in the conflict and shown that it was capable of acting as a global police force, a first step on the road to a one world government.

For the remainder of Mao's reign, the country suffered enormously but the West remained unconcerned and was happy to keep China ostracised and impoverished. Mao was not following instructions from the global elite during this period, he was on his own and focused on maintaining personal power by all means necessary. During this time Israel was consolidating its position in the Middle East before embarking on its goal of being at the crossroads of a Eurasian Superstate.

For the time being, China would remain in the cold. Once Israel's survival had been assured following the Yom Kippur War, the rehabilitation of China began in earnest. It would take decades for China to rise from its ashes and in the meantime Israel's grip over the United States would tighten and it would use the latter's military might to destabilise its neighbours.

What is Israel's connection with the so-called "global elite" and who in fact comprise this elite? This is never an easy question to answer because its members prefer to remain in the shadows but essentially its comprised of Anglo-European banking families who maintain an iron grip over the world's financial system. Many but not all of these families are Jewish. The Jewish elite have always prioritised their own survival and prosperity over the welfare of their rank-and-file brethren.

Israel is a complex country and has been overrun in the past few decades by Russian Jews, many of whom don't even identify as Jewish and some of whom are not Jewish at all. The Zionists are those who believe that Israel has the right to dominate the Middle East and who aspire to create a Greater Israel that extends from the Nile to the Euphrates. Many are Jews but not all and many Jews outside of Israel do not support the actions of the Israeli government.

Over the course of the twentieth century the goals of the global elite and the Zionists have converged. Initially, the idea of establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine was viewed with suspicion by the Jewish banking families like the Rothschilds but they eventually gave their support. They helped Adolf Hitler rise to power knowing full well that his hostility to Jews would drive them toward either Israel or the United States with both countries becoming inextricably linked.

The cold war extended from 1945 to the late 1980's and was designed to maintain fear and apprehension in the West. The Russian government had only survived the post-revolutionary period thanks to Western support. The intent was to build up both Germany and Russia and pit one against the other, as happened. Postwar, Russia was quickly built up as a sinister threat to democracy and China soon followed.

The Russia-China axis of evil was effective in boosting arms sales and maintaining international tensions but with the intentional collapse of the Soviet Union and the opening up of China, a replacement had to be found. Islamic terrorism was chosen. That phase is ending and a new cold war is being activated. China and Russia are once again becoming the axis of evil, with Iran being included.

This time however, I think that Xi is complicit. He has been told of the course of action he is to follow. Why else would he have engaged in the obviously distastrous covid-zero policy that represents a great leap backwards economically akin to Mao's initiative of the late 50's and early 60's. Clearly there is a bigger picture to discern in all of this apparent madness.

There's no doubt that the government's of the world are envious of the degree of control that China has over its massive population. The country is a giant social experiment. How do you get vast swatches of the population to line up for Covid tests every two or three days in all sorts of weather? Well, China has succeeded and the governments of the world have taken note. It can be done.

Xi and China will be well rewarded in the long term. In the new financial order that is emerging, China will have far more influence than it now has. The United States dollar will lose its reserve status and the Chinese yuan will form an important part of a basket of currencies. The world will begin to look increasing like China in terms of social control as the impact of Central Bank Digitial Currencies begins to bite. China will of course have a significant head start.

China will form a crucial part of the Eurasian Superstate and trade will flourish between the other countries that comprise it. Russia will turn increasingly away from Europe. Perhaps this was not always the plan. According to Brendon O'Connell, Trump was brought in to oversee the withdrawal of the United States from NATO and to tolerate the increasingly close ties between Germany and Russia. It was hoped that Trump would usher in a period of increasing US isolationism and the buildup of an accelerated economic ties between North and South America.

This has not happened. The intervention of the US and NATO into the Ukraine-Russia conflict indicates that the United States is not willing to passively withdraw from Europe and that it is determined to maintain its presence there. In this sense, the Ukraine-Russia conflict is an indirect war against Germany by the United States. I can't help but feel this was planned and that Putin, like Jinping, is following instructions but was perhaps misled as to the response from the US and NATO. Was he told that there would be little resistance? The result has not turned out well for Europe or Russia.

Like Xi Jinping, perhaps Putin is playing the long game. He has told to maintain the pressure on Ukraine so as to destabilise the European economies and thus make a financial reset more justifiable. Like China, Russia will be rewarded by making the rouble part of the basket of currencies that will replace the US dollar as the sole reserve currency. Neither Jinping's zero covid policy nor Putin's war in Ukraine have made them popular in their own countries and yet they both are uncontested in their leadership. This fact is suggestive of a long term strategy that is more important to them than short term unpopularity.

There's no doubt that the global elite and the Zionists want to see the breakup of the United States. They desire an end to the unipolar world order that exists at the moment. Neither Russia nor China pose a serious threat to the United militarily and while the United States military continues its domination, the establishment of a multipolar world order is thwarted. With the increasing emphasis on city states, it is possible that the cities on the east and west coasts of the country as well as Chicago might be drawn into a northern alliance with Canada. Europe and Britain might join this alliance.

The central and southern parts of the countries, the Red Zone, might align with Mexico, Central America and South America. Russia would continue to be the bogeyman and Europe would look to the alliance with Britain and the United States for protection. So Blue Zone cities in the United States, along with Canada, Britain and Europe form one pole. The Red Zone of the United States along with Mexico, Central and South America form another pole. A fake war between Israel and Iran will lead to the creation of Greater Israel and a much enlarged Iran that includes Iraq and some of Saudi Arabia (including Mecca and Medina). Iran's sphere of influence will extend into the "Stans" and it will be another pole. Israel will then be at the hub of the so-called world island. China and India with their massive populations will be poles in themselves. Africa will continue to be exploited.

Australia and New Zealand will continue to remain safe havens for the global elite and ageing Zionists. Accordingly they will prosper. The Islamic countries such as Turkey, Pakistan and others will remain a problem. One thing that the global elite fear is a strong and vibrant religion that puts God first and mankind second. The global elite believe that they have justifiable rulership over mankind and God does not have any say in the matter. Thus they will do all in their power to weaken religions in general and Islam in particular because it is the most vibrant.

One way to do this is to exploit the split between Sunni and Shia moslems and to encourage separtist movements that will fragment the countries in the which moslems live. It remains to be whether the global elite will succeed in this and their other agendas. It is a grand plan and plenty of things can go wrong. One thing is certain. If they succeed, the results will be not all that dissimilar to the fate that overtook the Russians and Chinese following their respective revolutions. The disappearance of religion, a crushing of the human spirit and an iron control over a cowering humanity.

Thursday, 18 February 2021

Israel and the United States

This post is simply a reprint of material from this site. It gives a good overview of the way in which Israel has systematically stolen and resold United States technology and weaponry over the past few decades.

Israel gets most of its lifeblood from the US through foreign aid or stealing. A prime example of this is the Apollo affair, where Israel stole enriched uranium from the US to build their infamous nuclear weapons program through suspected Mossad agent, Zalman Shapiro, along with four Israeli intelligence agents, including Rafi Eitan, who visited NUMEC periodically between 1965 and 1970. This is how Israel operates.

However, the alt-media does not go further than the Apollo affair. They don't report on the much deeper and more consequential Israeli thieving of US high technology through the Talpiot Program and Unit 8200. Billions of dollars are being sucked out of the US economy through government contracts to Israeli technology and cybersecurity companies like Amdocs, which has access to all US telephone records through the NSA, and Comverse Infosys, which has access to all NSA electronic tapping equipment. Essentially, Israel runs the national security state. Israeli companies can spy on you. Where did they get the capability to become world leaders in the technology sector? The United States.

Part of the reason why Israeli tech firms are so competitive in the global market is due to a form of quasi-state capitalism, in which the Israeli government subsidizes 50 percent of Israeli tech firms' R&D costs. This gives these firms the ability to sell their goods and services at significantly lower prices than their American counterparts. This policy is socialist in nature, which Phil Giraldi pointed out in a speech for the Council for the National Interest:

"Israel, a socialist country where government and business work hand in hand, has obtained significant advantages by systematically stealing American technology with both civilian and military applications."

How did Israel get access to US high technology and intellectual property? It all began in the 1970s, when the US and Israeli governments formed BIRD (Israel-United States Bi-national Industrial Research and Development) Foundation. BIRD funds joint partnerships between Israeli and American companies, with 50 percent of its funding coming from the US government. That's right, our taxpayer money is funding Israeli industry, while our infrastructure is in shambles. This quote from a Bloomberg article is Talpiot in action:

Subsequently, Israel uses this advantage to flood the US market with their technology exports, partly due to the 1985 Israel-United States Free Trade Agreement, destroying American high technology jobs in the process. This was the first free trade agreement agreed upon by the United States. It reduced all tariffs on Israeli imports, and is the only free-trade agreement that does not have a chapter on intellectual property rights . That means that Israel can have access to US intellectual property under US law.
"The company [BIRD] promotes joint industrial R&D between American and Israeli companies. They provide a maximum of $1.2 million funding per project. BIRD-supported projects allow leading Israeli technology companies to access key world class-US companies and establish business ties."

All this technology that Israel has stolen was developed by tax payer money through DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). Nearly all of Apple's technology was developed by DARPA. Google emerged through DARPA technology and the CIA's MDDS (Massive Digital Data Systems) project, and Facebook raised its initial capital through an investment from Peter Thiel, whose data mining company, Palantir, was first funded by the CIA Venture capital firm, In Q Tel.

There you go, US government funded BIRD gives Israeli tech companies access to "world-class US companies." That is where the Israeli high tech industry gets its lifeblood. Using this access to US industry, Israel set up a massive espionage operation in the United States to steal secret US defense secrets, military technology, and intellectual property in the early 1980s. One operative, Jonathan Pollard, was caught in this operation. Pollard was a US intelligence agent/Israeli spy who stole thousands of documents revealing the methods used by the US for signal intelligence gathering. From then on, Israel had the same intelligence gathering capabilities as the United States. Without Pollard, Israel would never have been able to engage in signal intelligence gathering, which means that the infamous Israeli companies tied to 9/11: Amdocs and Verint, would never have been formed. But Pollard was just the tip of the iceberg. There was a whole Israeli Espionage Network surrounding and working with Pollard, including guys like Richard Perle, Frank Gafney JR, Douglas J Feith, John F Lehman Jr, and Paul Wolfowitz.

Furthermore, there are Zionist fingerprints all over tech giants like Google and Facebook. Google was initially partly funded by American Jew, Andy Bechtolsheim, the co founder of the tech firm, Sun Microsystems, which has a major R&D center in Israel. Many other tech firms including Google, Facebook, IBM, Motorola, Microsoft, Qualcomm, and Apple have R&D centers in Israel as well. Why would these firms choose to have R&D centers near Tel Aviv? Tel Aviv is the ninth most expensive city in the world. Furthermore, it would make more sense economically to have R&D centers in a place like Bangladesh, where wages are significantly lower with a similar supply of high tech workers.
These companies operate in Israel because they seek to make Israel the high tech capital of the world, where Israel will rule the world in a one world government from Jerusalem as Ben Gurion predicted.

Shortly before the Times report, Israel opened an office of the Israeli Academy of Sciences in Beijing. Doubtless it was that blatant act that caused U.S. officials to begin leaking information. The Times' source said that Israel's supposedly academic office in Beijing was actually "facilitating a whole range of military-to-military cooperation between Israel and China.":

Furthermore, Israel sells their US originated high technology to our enemies, Russia and China. Russia and China then sell that technology to Iran. Therefore, Israel is indirectly arming Iran. The Iran-Israel conflict is a charade. If Israel was really an enemy of Iran, they would never allow China to sell Israeli sold military technology to Iran, let alone sell Israeli military technology to China in the first place. On top of that, Israel has numerous historical ties to the Islamic Republic of Iran, as I laid out in my article, "Iran Not an Enemy of the Jewish Elite".

Ariwatch.com does a fantastic job of detailing the history of Israel transferring US technology to China in their article, "Israel's Technology Transfer to China":

"On June 13, 1990 the Los Angeles Times reported that Israel had become the largest supplier of advanced military technology to China since the United States banned military sales to that country a year earlier. An unnamed U.S. official told the newspaper that Israel was a "back door to U.S. technology that the United States won't sell them."
Israel was breaching the U.S. embargo against China using technology the U.S. had given to Israel for its own defense, even though the technology came with the restriction that Israel would not re-export.

According to the article, intelligence experts in the West and Asia believed Israel had provided China with some of the advanced technology needed to modernize China's jet planes and missiles. U.S. officials had told Israel they strongly opposed the military cooperation because it undercut U.S. sanctions against China. "This is over our objections," a senior administration official told the newspaper. U.S. officials said that Israel was not operating as a proxy for the United States in these sales.

The story had no discernible impact on Israel. It went on selling arms technology to China and upgrading relations between the two countries. A year after the Times report, in June 1991, China and Israel signed an agreement on scientific cooperation.

On Nov. 20, 1991, the East Coast press reported that Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Arens made a secret four-day visit to China earlier that month. By the end of 1991, China's Deputy Foreign Minister Yang Fuchang visited Israel.

About the same time, a study by the Pentagon-supported RAND Corp. became public with the conclusion that Israel had become "China's leading foreign supplier of advanced technology." It said there had been reports that Israel had helped China develop the HQ-61 surface-to-air missile, the CSS-2 intermediate missile, the PL-8 air-to-air and surface-to-air missile, as well as advanced armor for battle tanks and an air-borne early warning radar system. It said that Israel was currently cooperating with China to develop an advanced fighter jet.

On Jan. 24, 1992 China and Israel established formal diplomatic relations in ceremonies in Beijing. The occasion was attended by Chinese Foreign Minister Qian Qichen and Israeli Foreign Minister David Levy.

The Sino-Israeli relationship was a strange one. China traditionally favored the Arabs in the Arab-Israel conflict. Moreover, while Israel based its pleas for enormous amounts of U.S. aid on the danger from Arab countries, its selling of weapons technology to China was indirectly helping strengthen the Arabs because China was a major supplier of missiles to Iran and such Arab countries as Saudi Arabia and Syria.

In an obvious effort to dampen the burgeoning Sino-Israeli relationship, U.S. officials stepped up their leaks. Unnamed officials revealed in early March 1992 that there was "overwhelming" evidence of Israel cheating on written promises not to re-export U.S. weapons technology to Third World countries, including China. They added that there was well-founded suspicion that Israel was also selling secrets of America's Patriot anti-missile missile to China. A U.S. team of experts was dispatched to Israel in late March but it failed to find proof of Israeli cheating. The State Department said on April 2 that "the Israeli government has a clean bill of health on the Patriot issue."

But there was disagreement in the government. Defense Secretary Dick Cheney said there remained "good reason" to believe diversion had taken place. CIA Director Robert Gates agreed, saying, "There is some indication that they [the Chinese] have some of the [Patriot] technology."

These disclosures were followed by a report in The Wall Street Journal saying that Israel illegally re-exports technology to a number of countries beyond China, including Chile, Ethiopia, South Africa and Thailand. There was "no doubt in the U.S. intelligence community that Israel has repeatedly engaged in diversion schemes." The Washington Post added that one official said there were "lots and lots of clear-cut cases." Apparently the U.S. had more than enough evidence to convict Israel, if it had the political will to do so.

The leaks by unnamed official sources came just days before Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Arens was due to meet on March 16, 1992 with his counterpart, Dick Cheney. Arens' initial public reaction was outrage: "There is not a grain of truth. No truth in it at all." But as the volume of charges grew, his statements changed to questioning the motives of the leakers: "The real story is who are these unnamed individuals who are floating these malicious rumors?" Defense Secretary Cheney and his spokesmen declined any comment.

The subject went to the heart of the economic prosperity of the Jewish state. Arms sales of around $1.5 billion annually accounted for 40 percent of Israel's exports and were based almost entirely on U.S. technology.

On April 1, 1992 the State Department released a report by its inspector general charging that a "major recipient" of U.S. military aid was engaged in a "systematic and growing pattern" of selling secret U.S. technology in violation of U.S. law. The public report did not directly name Israel, but officials left no doubt that it was the subject of the report. The report said Israel's violations began about 1983 and that Israel sought to conceal the violations. A secret version of the report allegedly identified Chile, China, Ethiopia and South Africa as among the recipients of Israel's sales.

State Department Inspector General Sherman M. Funk said he notified Secretary of State James A. Baker III about intelligence reports of Israel's violations in June 1991 and that new procedures to prevent future violations were put in place under an operation called Blue Lantern. Funk said U.S. officials previously had depended on verbal assurances from Israel that it was not retransferring. But, he said, such assurances from Israel
"are not an effective mechanism for providing end-use verification. We identified instances where U.S. items and technology were retransferred or were used in violation of the assurances."

He added that he had recommended that Israel be forced to repay the money illicitly earned from the transfers but Deputy Secretary of State Lawrence S. Eagleburger rejected the proposal as being an impossible chore. Eagleburger was a protégé of former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and a strong supporter of Israel.

How Israel became so technologically advanced was revealed in a study by the General Accounting Office. The giveaway began in 1970 with the signing of a Master Defense Development Data Exchange Agreement that provided for the greatest transfer of U.S. technology to any country ever undertaken. The transfer was made by what was called Technical Data Packages: the entire complex of blueprints, plans and types of materials required to actually construct weapons.

Over the next eight years more than 120 such packages were given to Israel, according to a 1979 study by the Middle East Arms Transfer Panel. This massive infusion of technology boosted Israel's economy. By 1981, Israel had emerged from being a technologically backward arms importer to the seventh largest exporter of military weapons in the world, with overseas sales of $1.3 billion.

An Israeli writer observed:
On Oct. 12, 1993 the CIA revealed to the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee that Israel had been selling advanced military technology to China for more than a decade. Central Intelligence Director R. James Woolsey estimated that the trade "may be several billion dollars."

Woolsey added:

"Building on a long history of close defense industrial relations, including work on China's next-generation fighter, air-to-air missiles and tank programs, and the establishment of diplomatic relations in January 1992, China and Israel appear to be moving toward formalizing and broadening their military technical cooperation."
"The Americans have made virtually all their most advanced weaponry and technology, meaning the best fighter aircraft, missiles, radar, armor, and artillery, available to Israel. Israel, in turn, has utilized this knowledge, adapting American equipment to increase its own technological sophistication, reflected tangibly in Israeli defense offerings."

Despite the number of reports over the years that Israel was illicitly profiting from U.S. technology at the cost of American companies and U.S. security, Washington continued to provide Israel ever-increasing amounts of technology. According to a report in 1992, there were 322 separate cooperative U.S.-Israeli ventures at that time, valued at $2.9 billion. In addition, there were 49 country-to-country programs involving Israel in co-development or co-production and research with the United States, and there existed 36 active data exchange agreements and 11 new proposed accords. The report concluded: "The magnitude of existing cooperative efforts with Israel is extensive and growing rapidly." In 1993, when Bill Clinton became president he promised to lift the "technological barrier" by granting Israel even more sophisticated technology.

Meanwhile Sino-Israeli relations flourished. Israeli President Chaim Herzog visited China between Dec. 24 and 30, 1992. In January 1993, with the administration of President Clinton taking over in Washington, Israel and China signed a contract permitting Israel to buy Chinese coal. On Feb. 14, 1993, the two countries signed a scientific agreement for joint research projects in electronics, medical technology, renewable energy, agriculture and civilian uses of space technology. Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin denied that the trade reached billions of dollars, adding that the figure for 1992 was about $60 million. "All these stories of billions of dollars of arms business in the past 10 years are total nonsense," he said.

"We have made it clear time and again that we have never done a thing against American law ... never transmitted items of technology that we got from the United States. We are not stupid enough to endanger Israel's annual $3 billion in U.S. aid."
The CIA said that indications of stronger Sino-Israeli ties were the opening of a number of Israeli military sales offices in China, the Feb. 14, 1993 signing of an agreement to share technology, and the current visit to Beijing of Rabin. The report stated (he issued his statement in Beijing, where he was on an official four-day visit.):

"We believe the Chinese seek from Israel advanced military technologies that the U.S. and Western firms are unwilling to provide. Beijing probably hopes to tap Israeli expertise for cooperative development of military technologies, such as advanced tank power plants and airborne radar systems, that the Chinese would have difficulty producing on their own."

In 1994 Professor Duncan L. Clarke of The American University in Washington, DC reported in a study:
"For years, Israel had violated the Arms Export Control Act and related executive agreements. [30] Israel has employed U.S. weaponry contrary to U.S. law and policy, incorporated U.S. technology into Israeli weapons systems without prior approval, and made improper transfers of U.S. missile and other defense systems and technologies to other countries, including Chile, China, and South Africa."

In early 1995 came another series of media reports on Israel's China trade. These led to official denials by Israel. David Ivri, the director-general of the Israeli Defense Ministry, admitted on Jan. 3 that Israel had sold China "some technology on aircraft" but added that it was not U.S. technology and that the contracts were "very small in magnitude."

In conclusion, Israel's military and high technology sectors are US taxpayer subsidized. Our taxpayer money is going to a country which sells our high technology to our enemies, namely China. China has gotten a lot of its technological capabilities from Israel. China uses this technology to steal US intellectual property, which the Trump administration has rightly brought up as an issue. However, the Trump administration never mentions Israel, who directly hands China this technology. President Trump does not care at all about US intellectual property theft. If he did, he would call Israel out, just like the BBC and Washington Examiner have done. He won't though, because Trump and his buddy Putin are, "fans of Bibi."

On Jan. 6, Aded Ben-Ami, the spokesperson for Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, again denied that Israel had illegally transferred any U.S. technology to China. "Israel did not transfer any American technology or American components to China," he said. Two days later Defense Secretary William Perry discussed the issue with Prime Minister Rabin in Jerusalem, but the Israeli leader again denied that any U.S. technology was involved.

Then, suddenly, the issue disappeared from the public eye.

The controversy that had begun in 1990 with anonymous leaks and had grown into official charges by the United States, culminated at the beginning of 1995 with discussions between the two countries at the highest level. After Perry's meeting with Rabin the subject dropped from public sight. What action was taken, if any, was not announced."

See, it's all a scam. They're all in this together. Israel transfers high technology to China, who in turn, transfers that technology to Arab countries and Iran. Therefore, Israel is an indirect ally of Iran and SYRIA. I bet you thought that Assad was an arch enemy of Israel. Well, Syria gets extensive military technology from Russia and China. According to the Brookings institution, "Russia and China Provide Cover for Assad's Syria." Therefore, Israel indirectly, "provides cover for Assad's Syria." Recently, Israel's tolerance of Assad has become clear. According to this article by Haaretz:

This is a key quote from that article:

"Moreover, while Israel based its pleas for enormous amounts of U.S. aid on the danger from Arab countries, its selling of weapons technology to China was indirectly helping strengthen the Arabs because China was a major supplier of missiles to Iran and such Arab countries as Saudi Arabia and Syria."
"Several weeks ago, Israel reportedly told Russia that it wouldn't oppose that [Assad in power], as if the decision were in its hands or as if Israel even had any leverage over what kind of government is in power in Syria after the war ends."

With all this documented evidence of Israel reverse engineering US technology to build up its own tech firms with Israeli military intelligence people through the Talpiot Program and Unit 8200, most alt-media personalities still never mention it. Israel is the MAIN reason why China is a high tech super power. China got all its military technology from Israel. Israel has violated US law by re-exporting US military technology to China, yet they have never beared any consequences. For example, in the 1990s, Israel supplied China with Python III Missiles, which utilized US developed technology for Sidewinder Missiles. This rightfully outraged the lower levels of the US military, who have been slowly ramping up pressure against Israel and doing some damage. For example, in 2013 , "a top Israeli defense official was forced to step down after the United States expressed fury at Israel's decision to sell military equipment to China." Also in 2013, the U.S. military was reportedly concerned that, "the technology could ultimately find it way to Iran." It's out in the open, yet people still think that Iran is Israel's arch enemy.

In regard to the lower levels of the Pentagon being outraged at Israel for transferring US technology to our enemies, perhaps the Secretary of Defense James Mattis is on to something, as Brendon O'Connell points out. The Pentagon is being audited for the first time. If this audit is legit, it could reveal the Pentagon's Israeli Swamp, with all the, " shady companies with ties to Israel " receiving billions of dollars worth of contracts from the NSA. The fact that James Mattis and President Trump are in a little rift supports this claim. However, it is very possible that this audit will be a ruse to give President Trump credibility yet reveal nothing of value. I am open to both viewpoints; I am not leaning to one or the other, and I will always keep my eyes open on the matter.

The issue of the US subsidizing the Israeli tech industry is an issue that will get across to both progressives, who will be outraged that our government is subsidizing a foreign country's economy while sucking out billions of dollars from our economy, and paleo-conservative anti-communists who will be infuriated that our alleged "greatest ally" is funding and arming our enemies: Russia, China, and even Iran. This is the winning strategy; getting both sides of the political spectrum together on the same issues; not walking in the streets holding up childish signs that say, "Expel the Jew by 22!", which Patrick Little did at a Holocaust Museum. That sign that Patrick Little made is the perfect ammunition for the ADL and Jewish owned media to call all critics of Jewish power "Nazis", who seek to throw all Jews out of the country. That is not the way to go. We need to reach out to the common Jewish taxpayer and explain to them that the Jewish elite are not operating in their best interests either. Ordinary Jews are just as much of dupes as the rest of us. They are being duped to support a supremacist state and ideology, instead of learning to keep their culture within themselves and promote Logos (the natural order) with the rest of the world.

References

Friday, 2 August 2019

Iran: Behind the Facade

Figure 1

Today I discovered that Brendon O'Connell (Figure 1) has a new YouTube channel to replace the one that was taken down. I've now subscribed to it and will work my way back through some of his previous videos. In the video that I watched (Israel Owns The NSA), he is in his usual form, swearing copiously and railing against the alt-news community. Sadly, he still thinks that is useful to phone up the United States' Department of Homeland Security and alert them to any Israeli misdeeds within the country. Still, he represents a unique voice in the alt-news community although I do not share his naive optimism that the heavily listing ship that is the United States can ever right itself.

I think its Israel's intention that it should not. The United States served the Jewish supremacists well over the course of the twentieth century but in this current century their agenda is to rule the world. To that end, strong nation states are an obstacle and the United States is still the strongest nation state of all, even if it has conceded control of its foreign policy to Israel. If the United States withdraws from the region due to internal domestic issues or as a result of a return to isolationism, then it will be easy to concoct some conflict between Iran and Saudi Arabia. In the course of this conflict, Israel will be forced to intervene as Saudi Arabia is routed and new borders agreed upon, similar to what is shown in Figure 3. Figure 2 shows United States bases currently surrounding Iran, some of which would need to be dismantled or stood down before any potential conflict.

Figure 2

What's relevant to this post is Brendon's opinions regarding Iran. He has only recently travelled to that country and so his observations are certainly of interest. He does not think that Iran is a real enemy of either the United States or Israel but rather that it is a manufactured enemy. To that end, Iran is willingly playing its part. It's easy to get distracted by the posturing that is reported by the mainstream media. It's not just that manufactured international tensions are good for arms sales. Just as important is the fact that Israel needs an enemy or rather a perceived enemy to support the notion that it is in danger of being overrun or destroyed. Most its former enemies, of which there were many, have now been neutralised in various ways so that only Iran remains as a credible threat. Hezbollah is a convenient creation that brings Iran to Israel's doorstep and so serves as a useful tool to exaggerate the dangers that Israel claims it is beset by.

Iran is the centre of Shia Islam in a Muslim world that largely follows Sunni Islam. These two main branches of Islam are not on friendly terms and it is in Israel's interests to drive as big a wedge between the two as it can. Clandestine support for Shia activists in Sunni-dominated countries is one way of doing this. However, what if Israel had concocted a secret pact with Iran to divide up the geographical region that lies between the two countries. The Iranian theocracy must dream of dominating Islam as it once did in the past and of controlling the holy sites of Mecca and Medina. For its part Israel has dreams of a Greater Israel bounded by the Nile and the Euphrates (as shown in Figure 3).

Figure 3

In Saudi Arabia, Mohammad bin Salman is ripe for replacement. He is deeply unpopular with many of his fellow royals and, after the Khashoggi incident, is now a pariah in the outside world. It would be very easy to gain support for a coup there. The country was set up by the West and it can as easily be dismantled by it. How the country could be broken up and divided between Israel and Iran remains to be seen but some sort of phoney war, as alluded to earlier, is one way to achieve this.

It's not as unlikely as it sounds. The relationship between Israelites and the Babylonians goes back thousands of years. The Talmud is often referred to as the Babylonian Talmud. Not that the modern day "Israelites" have anything in common with the Jewish inhabitants of old. The current inhabitants are largely Ashkenazim from a region of the Russian steppes. Overall, I'm saying that (maybe) the current conflict between Israel/USA and Iran is pure theatre concocted to distract us from a deeper agenda which may be the creation of a Greater Israel and a Greater Iran. At the moment, most people are watching the shadow puppets (see Figure 4) as they are portrayed in our mainstream media but what's really of interest is what the puppet masters are up to behind the scenes.

Figure 4