Death by Doctors

The word "iatrogenic" means "relating to illness caused by medical examination or treatment". Some medical "professionals" might argue that such a word describes an impossible scenario because medical interventions can never cause harm. However, let's look at the following piece of history:

Ignaz Semmelweis was a Hungarian physician who lived in the 19th century and is now known for his work on the importance of handwashing in preventing the spread of infectious diseases.

In the mid-1800s, Semmelweis was working at a hospital in Vienna where he noticed that women were dying from childbed fever at a much higher rate in the maternity ward where doctors and medical students worked, compared to the ward where midwives worked. He proposed that this was due to doctors and medical students performing autopsies and then going to deliver babies without washing their hands, which was transferring infectious material to the women.

However, his ideas were met with ridicule and opposition from the medical community at the time, and he was eventually committed to an insane asylum, where he died at the age of 47. It was not until many years later, after the work of Louis Pasteur and the development of germ theory, that Semmelweis's ideas were recognized as important contributions to the understanding and prevention of infectious diseases.

Well some might argue that that was then and this is now but I don't think much has changed in the early part of the 21st century. At least not in regards to the "ridicule and opposition" directed at any well-intended criticism of the "profession" from those within it or, heavens forbid, from those not within it. What has changed is the power of BIG PHARMA over medical practice, or should that be malpractice. The arrogance of allopathic medicine has soared since the 19th century as well, subjugating and denigrating all alternative medicine practices before it. The motto nowadays might well be ONE WAY, WITH DRUGS.

Side-effects from the drugs people take are no problem because drugs have been developed to treat those side-effects. There's little point saying more. As I've said before my motivation to post to this blog remains low. Once you realise what's going on, it's pointless mentioning specific examples that confirm the rolling-out of the agenda. The only bright light in an otherwise dismal firmament has been listening to music by "Five Times August".

Five Times August is the solo act of singer/songwriter Brad Skistimas. Skistimas has appeared on the FOX Business channel as an expert "Do-It-Yourself" indie artist and featured in Billboard Magazine, Performing Songwriter, Guitar Player, PeopleMagazine, and USA Today. He was the first completely unsigned act to have an album distributed in Walmart stores nationwide with 2007's "The Independent." The music has been featured on many popular TV shows, commercials, and films and tour dates have supported some of the nation's top acts.

In early 2021 Five Times August began releasing a series of protest songs taking aim at Covid-era regulations, the Biden administration, Justin Trudeau, as well as Anthony Fauci with the hit song "Sad Little Man," which reached #1 on several Amazon and Apple Music charts.

Several of the music videos for these tracks have been suppressed and censored on social media platforms like YouTube and Facebook. Despite being restricted by big tech, the videos have been viewed millions of times and press includes prominent features on Glenn Beck, Chad Prather, Del Bigtree's The HighWire, The Federalist, The Post Millennial, RebelNews, and much more.

​Skistimas performed his song "Silent War" on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington DC for 35,000 attendees at the Defeat the Mandates rally on January 23rd 2022, and more recently even had the honor of singing The National Anthem for Dr. Ben Carson and President Donald Trump.

In November 2022 Five Times August released the full length album "Silent War," a compilation featuring all of the recent protest singles. The album reached as high as #5 on Amazon's best selling albums, sitting between mainstream artists Taylor Swift and Bruce Springsteen. The album also reached #1 on Amazon and Apple Music's singer/songwriter and alternative charts.

Read more: fivetimesaugust.com/press.html

ARTIST CONTACT: Brad@fivetimesaugust.com

​MANAGEMENT: Kelly@sevenplacesmusic.net

Relating to Others

The majority of people are consumed with their day to day existence and don't give much thought to the wider world. Their understanding of it is drawn largely from what they absorb via mainstream media. Often they do not take kindly to having their limited world view challenged.

Many westerners are taking medication for physical and psychological problems they have or imagine they have. These medications have been prescribed by doctors that they trust and casting aspersions on the integrity and competency of these pharmaceutical dispensers is likely to provoke hostility. As the old saying goes, it's easy to con people but far more difficult to convince them that they've been conned.

It's best not to bring up controversial matters unless they arise naturally from the conversation. When they do however, it's sometimes hard to resist being controversial. I once remember talking to someone who brought up the topic of Michelle Obama, in what context I can't remember, but I intervened and asked whether he knew that "she" was a "he". That stopped the flow of the conversation. 

I need to remember that I'm 74 years of age, I've been retired for seven years and over that period I've spent a lot of time trying to work out what's  really going on in the world. My naivete back in the days when I did work is embarrassing when I reflect on it. My new found knowledge tends to isolate rather than connect me to others. It's not that I'm superior to others in any way. It's just that I've taken the time to dig a little deeper and what I've discovered hasn't improved the quality of my life.

It seems that living in blissful ignorance has benefits. It's comforting when people believe that Big Government has their interests at heart and that Big Medicine is dedicated to improving their health. The reality of course is darkly different but most people are not willing to accept such a bleak view of the world. They believe that people are intrinsically good and the fact is that they are. It's the people in power that are not but these people are remote and largely faceless. Their dark agenda seems unbelievable when suggested.

Nothing in their experience supports such dark beliefs. The fact checkers are quick to discredit such notions when a superficial investigation is carried out. I remember talking to someone about vaccine damage and every claim that I made was checked for veracity using Snopes, "The definitive Internet reference source for researching urban legends, folklore, myths, rumors, and misinformation". To that person, this reference source was definitely definitive and anything that I said to the contrary was to be dismissed.

So best to keep silent and if the opportunity for comment does arise, it's necessary to assess the person with whom I am conversing. How will they react to what I might say? Some will react with instant ridicule while others may be willing to consider the possibility. Most simply don't want their comfortable world view disturbed. Given the stresses that most people are under, they don't want additional stress. 

Mammon

Mark Moss posted an interesting video on his YouTube channel. It was titled Ukraine War Outcome Decided By JP Morgan? and made mention of the interesting fact that the first Central Bank of England was established in 1694:

The Bank of England was incorporated by act of Parliament in 1694 with the immediate purpose of raising funds to allow the English government to wage war against France in the Low Countries (see War of the Grand Alliance). A royal charter allowed the bank to operate as a joint-stock bank with limited liability. Source.

Remarkable to reflect on the fact that the first Central Bank in the United States was not established until 1913, more that two centuries later. It was all downhill from there for humanity.

Mammon: The Demon of Greed
Source

Let's recall that King James 11 was deposed in 1688 and King William and Queen Mary from Orange took over in 1689. This was a major transformation of the English nobility that preceded the creation of the Bank of England. This seems to have signaled the shift in the financial centre of gravity of Europe from the Low Countries to England, just as it shifted from Spain to the Low Countries in the early 16th century.

The 18th Century certainly marked the rise of England and the decline of the Netherlands. A largely Catholic France challenged England throughout the century but the French Revolution and the subsequent defeat of Napoleon finished that country's hopes of global dominance. In the 19th Century, the financial dominance of Great Britain was unopposed although as the century progressed, the unification of Prussia and the German States under Bismarck saw Germany emerge as a potential threat. 

Germany served the banksters well in the 20th Century. With the establishment of the US Fed in 1913, the financial centre of gravity began to shift again. Mark Moss in his video makes no mention of the Zionists and wisely so as he doesn't want to see his channel banned or demonetized. However, their influence was crucial in shaping the events of the 20th Century and in establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

The Oxford Dictionary defines Mammon as follows:

... wealth regarded as an evil influence or false object of worship and devotion. It was taken by medieval writers as the name of the devil of covetousness, and revived in this sense by Milton: "others have forsaken Mammon in search of something on a more spiritual plane"

As Jesus said, you cannot serve God and Mammon. It is those worshipers of Mammon who are behind the wars that have plagued humanity over the past few centuries and they continue to do so to the present day.

Medieval theologians assigned seven archdemons to the seven deadly sins, and Mammon became the demon of greed. Similarly, Mammon was also sometimes conflated with the Greek god Plutus and depicted as the seductive god of riches. Famous personifications of mammon are found in Ben Jonson’s The Alchemist, John Milton’s Paradise Lost, and Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene. The word eventually gained a secular connotation as an all-consuming pursuit of wealth and was often used in critiques of capitalism or of wealthy individuals. Source.

In an earlier post about The Khazarian Mafia, I outlined the shadowy origins of the people who now run the world. They are the worshipers of Mammon and currently God seems to be in retreat. This of course only seems to be the case. A backlash is growing and many will forsake Mammon in search of a more spiritual plane. 

Moviedom

For me, movies are becoming increasingly unwatchable. Take for instance, my latest attempt that involved "Knock at the Cabin" with screenplay by M. Night Shyamalan and starring Dave Bautista among others. It involved a family consisting of two fathers and an eight year old girl of Chinese ethnicity. This frontal assault on the family by the movie industry is nowadays relentless and gathering momentum. The intent is to redefine the family so that children being raised by two fathers or two mothers is just as acceptable as being raised by the traditional father and mother. 

At the point where the happy parents were picking their baby up from the hospital, I turned the movie off. There's obviously a quota now that movie studios have to adhere to and this involves showing a certain percentage of families in movies as comprising same sex couples. I don't know what the percentage is but it seems sizable. 

Episode 3 of "The Last of Us" featured an entire episode depicting the relationship between two gay guys from start to finish over the course of many years. It bore no relationship to the plot of the story that effectively was put on hold at the end of episode 2 and restarted with episode 4. It was as if the producers used that entire episode to fulfill their quota so that they get on with the story.

While one wonders who really wants to see two bearded men kissing, the real issue is that this plot element was clearly injected into the story line to fulfill a quota. The quota is not only about the makeup of families and the sexual orientation of individuals, it involves the depiction of minorities. In the case of North America, this means a certain percentage of actors need to be black, Asian, Hispanic etc. The recent backlash against the BAFTA winners being almost exclusively white shows that the pressure is on to make awards conform to this quota system as well.

Film makers are under pressure to meet these standards or face the financial consequences. It's similar to the pressure being applied to businesses to adhere to ESG standards. It's all to do with a very small minority of people with inordinate influence deciding what is best for the vast majority of humanity. The sad fact is that this majority is easily lead. I remember watching Sunday Bloody Sunday in the cinema fifty years and the audience groaning in unison at the sight of Peter Finch kissing his male lover.

Most people have little idea of the battle that was fought between Hollywood and the Catholic Church regarding sexual content in movies. It's no secret that Jews run Hollywood, although it's really only acceptable to say so this if you're a Jew. It's also no secret that the Jews pioneered the porn industry. From the early days of Hollywood, the movie moguls were keen to add prurient content to their movies but the Catholic bishops, especially in cities like Boston, threatened a boycott and the moguls caved in. More details of this struggle can be read in "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit" by E. Michael Jones.

This restraint that had been forced upon Hollywood fell apart in the mid-sixties as Catholicism imploded. Excessive violence and disagreeable sexual content increasingly found its way into movies in the late sixties and early seventies. The rot has continued ever since but it's clearly now rotten to the core. You could watch nearly every movie before the mid-sixties with your family and not have them exposed to anything uncomfortable or extreme. That changed as the sixties unfolded.

The main point of this post is that good movies are not made by being forced to adhere to quotas regarding sexual orientation, ethnicity or whatever is deemed necessary by the movie mafia. Film makers should feel free to work with an all white cast of heterosexuals if it suits their purposes and awards should be decided on their merits and not whether they successfully fulfill woke quotas.

Rinse and Repeat

A tweet caught my attention this morning. Figure 1 shows a screenshot.

Figure 1

It's an interesting question to which everyone will have their own opinion but I suspect the percentage very high. I'm not proud of my own history in this regard. I remember watching "An Inconvenient Truth", a documentary released on May 24th 2006, and being suitably impressed. I can only cringe now at my naivete. 

I was still working full time back then and work did consume a lot of my time. I was also drinking and partying after work and generally enjoying life. It was only when I retired that I had unlimited time to delve deeply into what IS going on. Even then, navigating the alt-media had its own hazards. The controlled opposition is everywhere and is cultivated to capture those who know SOMETHING is going on but are not quite sure what.

For those who eschew MSM, the controlled opposition is there to capture and contain that demographic whose members will be fed just enough information to keep them outraged. The emotion however, will never spill out onto the streets or result in political initiatives but will be expended instead within the group of subscribers associated with a particular alt-media hero. The group acts effectively as an echo chamber and nothing of any substance arises that might effect real world outcomes. 

All the lies, deceit and propaganda promulgated by the MSM is best caricatured by visual images. These carry more weight than words which seems to have degenerated into doublespeak. Figure 2 is a good example of what I mean. The picture captures the constant distractions that are put in our way to obscure the deeper agenda that the Khazarian Mafia are pursuing.

Figure 2

Who are the Khazarian Mafia? Well Solzhenitsyn does a good job of saying who they are without saying who they are. See Figure 3.

Figure 3

"The global media is in the hands of the perpetrators" indeed as "the world (remains) ignorant about this enormous crime". The crimes and the criminality continue to the present day and "the greatest human slaughter of all time" may be a work in progress rather than an historical event.

C40 Cities

As national boundaries break down and city states become more dominant, this is what the mayors of certain cities have planned for you by 2030, if they get their way. 

C40 is a network of mayors of nearly 100 world-leading cities collaborating to deliver the urgent action needed right now to confront the climate crisis. Together, we can create a future where everyone, everywhere can thrive.

Let's start with air travel. See Figure 1.

Figure 1: source

Let that sink in. The progressive target is one short-haul return flight of less than 1500 kilometers every two years per person or every three years if the ambitious target is reached. For Australians living in Sydney and Melbourne and whose mayors have seemingly signed up for this, it means you don't get to leave Australia. Even New Zealand is out of reach because the distance from Sydney to Auckland is 2,155 kilometers.

Let's look at meat and dairy consumption targets. See Figure 2.

Figure 2: source

Take the progressive target of 90 kg of dairy. A litre of milk weighs a little over one kilogram so that translates to about one litre of milk every four days. The average supermarket sausage weight about 50 grams. The progressive target of 16 kg of meat means 320 sausages per year or less than one per day. Let that sink in. 

The targets for clothing are shown in Figure 3 and automobiles in Figure 4.

Figure 3: source

Figure 4: source

In Australia in 2022, the rate of vehicle ownership was 782 per thousand people. So the progressive target represents about a 75% reduction in vehicle ownership. As for the clothing targets, words fail me.

It's easy to dismiss these targets as unrealistic and unattainable but with the introduction of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) various "disincentives" and even outright prohibitions can be applied to our purchases so that we are forced to conform to these targets. One thing that can be done is to vote against the mayor of any city who has signed up to these C40 targets and make as many people as possible aware of what their mayor has done.

Our politicians and elected officials need to get a clear message that if they support ridiculous initiatives such as those proposed by the C40CITIES then they will be voted out of office.

A Thousand Words

A picture is worth a thousand words, so the cliche goes, and the graphic in Figure 1 confirms this.

Figure 1: source

Notice the bump on the right hand side of the Polio graph, the reasons for which I've discussed in an earlier post titled The Moth in the Iron Lung. The site where the above graphic was taken has this to say on its opening page:

THE U.S. HEALTHCARE SYSTEM IS A LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH

A 2016 report from Johns Hopkins School of Medicine shows that medical errors in hospitals and other healthcare facilities are incredibly common, and may now be the third-leading cause of death in the United States — claiming 251,000 lives every year, more than respiratory disease, accidents, stroke and Alzheimer’s.

Moreover, a 2014 study found that prescription drugs are now the fourth leading cause of death in the US. The Harvard study reported 2.74 MILLION serious adverse drug reactions per year come from properly prescribed drugs. And about 106,000 people DIE EVERY YEAR from drugs prescribed to them.

In addition to pharmaceutical drugs and medical error, vaccines are put into the mix. Vaccines do not create immunity, they create customers. It’s the best business model in the world. It keeps people coming back for more – forever.

There are multiple toxic ingredients in vaccines — some known to cause cancer and autoimmune disorders. These toxins create health issues that in turn create customers.

The best defense against disease is a healthy, strong immune system, not overloaded with toxins from food, water, air, and pharmaceutical products.

The site also has the graphic shown in Figure 2 on its opening page:

Figure 2

The site goes on to say:

At Learn The Risk, we realize that nothing will change with the system until more people understand the harm it is doing to our health. We are dedicated to educating and empowering people to step outside the system that profits off keeping us sick, then change will follow. We believe action is more important than words. We focus on educating and motivating people to find REAL health, those who then take to the streets to educate others and save lives.

How do we do this? With the most active and powerful billboard and ad campaigns, as well as the most impactful outreach program in the health movement. We host dozens of outreach events, successful social media campaigns, health talks and our annual health summit.

While it's difficult to trust anybody in the medical mafia nowadays, there are still some doctors who are genuinely trying to do the right thing. Dr. Suneel Dhand is one such doctor and in the video below, he gives his fellow professionals are well-deserved right roasting.

It will be interesting to see if this video remains accessible on YouTube.