The French Influence in Sub-Saharan Africa

The following is an interesting series of tweets regarding Niger and French influence over that country and other sub-Saharan countries.

1. What is African CFA Franc?

The birth of the CFA franc can be traced back to December 1945, when the French government, after ratifying the Bretton Woods Agreement, decided to create a currency for their beloved colonies in Africa. They cleverly named it the CFA, short for "French Colonies of Africa" or les colonies francaises de l’Afrique for those who prefer a touch of French flair. 

The French Treasury guaranteed the CFA franc under a fixed exchange rate. This rate was dependent on the deposit of a whopping 50% of CFA franc reserves into the French central bank. It split into two factions. 

On one side, we had the Communaute Financiere d’Afrique, or the "Financial Community of Africa," which included countries like Benin, Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo. On the other side, we had the Communaute Financiere de l’Afrique Centrale, or the "Financial Community of Central Africa," which brought together Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, and Gabon. 

So there you have it, folks! The CFA franc, born out of a French desire to keep their African colonies in check, has evolved into two financial communities, each with its own set of countries.

Figure 1

2. XAF and XOF ..!!!

The CFA franc zone comprises two monetary unions, encompassing a total of 14 African nations. The first is the West African Economic and Monetary Union, established in 1994, which includes Benin, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo. The second is the Central African Economic and Monetary Union, consisting of Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, and Gabon.

According to the latest available data from the World Bank, the Central African Republic has encountered an annual inflation rate of approximately 3.3% and a Meager gross domestic production (GDP) of 0.9%. These figures shed light on the economic situation within the country.

The CFA franc, one of the two regional African currencies, is backed by the French treasury in relation to the euro. It is important to note that the term "CFA franc" can refer to either the Central African CFA franc (XAF) or the West African CFA franc (XOF) in currency markets. Although these are distinct currencies, they are effectively interchangeable as they maintain the same monetary value against other currencies.

It is worth mentioning that, in theory, the French government or the monetary unions utilizing these currencies have the authority to alter the value of either one. This flexibility allows for potential adjustments in response to changing economic circumstances.

Overall, the CFA franc zone and its constituent monetary unions play a significant role in the economic landscape of sub-Saharan Africa. Understanding the dynamics and intricacies of these currencies is crucial for comprehending the region's financial environment.

3. The Rule Book of Economic Slavery

The Central Bank of West African States and the Bank of Central African States are responsible for coordinating monetary exchanges through operating accounts with the French Treasury. These accounts operate according to several rules, including:

1. Each central bank must maintain at least 50% of foreign assets with the French Treasury.

2. Foreign exchange cover of at least 20% should be maintained for “sight liabilities.”

3. Each government is limited to a ceiling of 20% of that country’s revenue from the previous year.

4. The currency was initially based on the French Franc exchange rate and later on it was pegged to the Euro with a fixed rate of 1 Euro = 655.96 CFA Francs.

5. Bak of France holds 50% of total currency reserves and pays a ceiling rate of interest of 0.75% annually.

6. In year 2019 ECOWAS announced that it will change West African CFA Franc to a new currency named "ECO" and that was supposed to happen by the early 2020 under below conditions:

a) A fiscal deficit of less than 3% of GDP

b) Inflation rate under 10%

c) National Debt of less than 70% of GDP

So, France and Western Hegemons worked overnight to ensure that this is sabotaged, and economic slavery of the African continent continues.

It is estimated that France now holds nearly $500 billions of African countries’ money in its treasury and will do anything to keep it. Moreover, the African countries do not have access to this money.

Figure 2

4. Control of Funds

As i said earlier, it is estimated that France currently holds nearly $500 billions of funds from African countries within its treasury, and it appears determined to retain control over these funds at all costs. Regrettably, the African nations are denied access to this substantial sum of money.

France permits these countries to access a mere 15 percent of the funds annually. Should they require a larger portion, they are compelled to borrow from the remaining 85 percent, which essentially constitutes their own money, albeit held hostage by the French Treasury. This arrangement forces them to borrow at commercial rates, further exacerbating their financial burden.

To compound matters, France imposes a limit on the amount these countries can borrow from their reserves. This limit is set at 20 percent of their public revenue from the previous year. Should the countries require a loan exceeding this threshold, France exercises its veto power to deny their request.

In a video, Jacques Chirac, the former president of France, candidly acknowledged that a significant portion of the funds held in French banks is derived from the exploitation of former colonies in Africa. This statement underscores the need for the French people to come to terms with this reality.

5. Control of Natural Resources

France asserts its entitlement to exploit all natural resources discovered within its borders. Additionally, France maintains its prerogative as the primary purchaser of any natural resources discovered within the territories of its former colonies. Consequently, African nations are restricted from freely seeking alternative partnerships.

Figure 3

6. Preferential Treatment

France exerts influence over African countries by imposing a preference for French interests and companies in the realm of public procurement and bidding. This practice, mandated by government contracts, prioritizes French companies above all others, even if partnering with non-French entities would be more advantageous for the African nations involved.

Consequently, numerous former French colonies find themselves with their key economic assets firmly in the hands of French entities. Take, for instance, Cote d'Ivoire, where French companies exercise complete ownership and control over vital utilities such as water, electricity, telephone services, transportation, ports, and major banks. This pattern extends to sectors like commerce, construction, and agriculture.

The ramifications of this arrangement are far-reaching. Not only does it limit the economic autonomy of African countries, but it also perpetuates a system where French interests dominate and stifle the growth and development of local industries. The unequal distribution of economic power hampers the ability of African nations to fully harness their resources and potential.

Figure 4

7. Military Authority

France asserts its exclusive authority to provide military equipment and training to African military officers. This is accomplished through a well-structured system of scholarships, grants, and "defense agreements" linked to the Colonial Pact, which establishes a shared currency, the CFA Franc, among Francophone nations. Consequently, African countries send their senior military officers to France for training.

Regrettably, the current state of affairs in Africa reveals that France has inadvertently fostered a significant number of individuals who have betrayed their own nations. These individuals are strategically activated by France whenever the need arises to orchestrate a coup d'etat or instigate political turmoil within Africa.

It is imperative to acknowledge the complex dynamics at play in this situation. France's position as the primary provider of military resources and training to African nations grants them considerable influence over the region. However, it is crucial to approach this matter with a balanced perspective, recognizing the potential consequences and implications of such actions.

By nurturing a network of trained military officers, France inadvertently creates a situation where loyalty to their own countries becomes compromised. This raises concerns about the long-term stability and sovereignty of African nations, as their military leadership may be swayed by external interests.

8. French Language Hegemony

African countries are required to adopt French as the official language for both the country and its educational system. The "Francophone" cultural and educational network, along with its various satellites and affiliates, is directly overseen by the French Minister of Foreign Affairs.

This situation exerts significant pressure on African individuals to prioritize the use of French over their native languages. Such a restriction is highly constraining, as it has been proposed that individuals who solely speak French have access to less than 4 percent of the world's knowledge and information.

9. Financial Reporting

African countries are required to submit an annual balance and reserve report to France. Failure to provide this report results in the denial of access to funds from the reserves held by the Central Bank of France. Furthermore, the central banks of former colonies are subject to control and management by the Central Bank of France.

10. Control over Military Alliances

African countries are prohibited from entering into any military alliances. In general, these countries maintain military alliances with their former colonizers. Additionally, France strictly prohibits African nations from seeking any form of military cooperation or protection beyond what is provided by the French government.

It is important to note that African countries are bound by restrictions that prevent them from engaging in military alliances. Historically, many of these nations have maintained close ties with their former colonizers, relying on them for military support and cooperation. France, in particular, imposes stringent regulations that limit African nations from seeking alternative sources of military assistance.

This policy has significant implications for the defense capabilities and sovereignty of African countries. By restricting their ability to forge independent military alliances, these nations are compelled to rely heavily on their former colonizers for protection and cooperation. This arrangement, while rooted in historical ties, raises questions about the autonomy and self-determination of African nations in matters of defense.

Furthermore, France's strict stance on military cooperation underscores the complex dynamics between African countries and their former colonizers. The French government's insistence on exclusive military ties can be seen as a means to maintain influence and control over its former colonies. This approach, however, may hinder the development of a more diverse and self-sufficient defense network for African nations.

In conclusion, African countries face limitations when it comes to entering into military alliances. The historical ties with former colonizers, coupled with France's prohibition on seeking alternative military cooperation, shape the landscape of defense partnerships in the region. These restrictions raise important questions about the autonomy and self-reliance of African nations, as well as the need for a more balanced and inclusive approach to military cooperation.

11. In Times of War

In times of war or global crisis, African countries are bound by a solemn obligation to align themselves solely with France.

It is a historical fact that over a million African soldiers made invaluable contributions to the defeat of Nazism and fascism during the tumultuous years of World War II. Regrettably, their remarkable efforts have often been overshadowed or underestimated.

12. Winds of Change

Whatever is happening in the West Africa especially in Niger right now is not a year or two's reckoning, but a long long long subjugation and pain inflicted on the African countries by the colonial imperialism which is manifesting itself in the open revolt now.

Winds of Change...!!!

Oh Yes...!!!

OfCourse...!!!

Putin and the Multipolar World Order

I watched this video on BitChute titled "THE PLAN - W.H.O PLANS FOR 10 YEARS OF PANDEMICS, FROM 2020 TO 2030" and it presented a quite reasonable argument for why this is probably their plan for the decade. There was a link to a site titled Stop World Control that contained a link to Putin and this is when things got a bit weird.

The site suggested that the following:

In 2010 the real Putin disappeared for a while, and was replaced by an entirely different man. He was radically distinct, not only in his physical appearance, but even more so in his beliefs and viewpoints. Significant facial differences are: 

• The new Putin has eyes half the size of his predecessor.
• The nose bridge of the real Putin was longer, more straight and sharper.
• The lips of the first Putin were touted, and sharper.
• The old Putin had distinct dark eye bags, while the new Russian president has no eye bags whatsoever. 
• The head of the new Putin is more round.

See Figure 1:

Figure 1

The article goes on to say:

Especially the eyes stand out to me: the old Putin had really big eyes, that often looked troubled. You could tell he was not happy. The new Putin is diametrically the opposite: his eyes are about twice as small, and have generally a kind, peaceful look. You will often see this new Putin with a calm, confident smile. Not at all the troubled man the first Putin appeared to be. 

Of course the media tries to cover this up with claims of plastic surgery, as they serve the purpose of keeping the population in a perpetual state of total ignorance.

The most profound difference in the new Putin is, that, while his predecessor was a Young Global Leader from the World Economic Forum, trained to promote the globalist agenda of a one world government, the new Putin has become the opposite of that. 

He openly opposes the globalist agenda, and calls for the preservation of sovereign nations. 

This is reminiscent of QAnon's claims the Trump had a plan to take out the globalists and Make America Great Again. Nothing happened. Here we have Putin being cast in a similar light. The "new" Putin is taking on the Globalists while the old Putin was a WEF lackey. Hmmm.

What Putin is in fact calling for is a multipolar world order to replace the unipolar world order that currently exists and in which the USA reigns supreme. See Figure 2.

Figure 2: source

Most other leaders are calling for a multipolar world order as well. It's presented as a good thing in this article with the United States being the major impediment to its actualisation:

Eurasia as a whole – the World Island – is a natural economic unit. It is entirely sustainable through its various geographic regions for all resource materials - agriculture, mining, forestry, fishing, natural gas, oil, coal, water. These may not all be distributed equally, but given the land mass and the possibilities for trade and transportation, that only creates the natural idea of a New Silk Road to incorporate trade throughout all regions.

Both China and Russia have large industrial sectors, large technological sectors, and trained and well educated work forces. India has a large and technologically savvy work force. Iran has many resources and a strong technological base. Germany – well, that is where Eurasia finds a dividing line, the artificial boundary of the New Cold War as manipulated by the U.S.

Europe is a natural trade partner with other elements of the World Island. Unfortunately its sycophantic puppet leaders of the EU/NATO have been sucked into the two main artificial fears created by the U.S. - fear of terror/Islam and fear of Russia. What it truly amounts to is the U.S. fear of losing its dominant global position should Europe, or even part of Europe, align itself with the rest of the World Island by joining in the infrastructure development being initiated by China and Russia.

It's an interesting article and should be read in full. However, is the actualisation of the multipolar world order necessarily a good thing? We know what destruction and chaos the U.S. has caused over the past few decades but it's foreign policy has been hijacked by a hostile foreign power, namely Israel, and used to that country's advantage. If the U.S. where to withdraw into zone of influence, the North-American Big Space, what would be the consequences for the world at large? 

The Bunting Cloverleaf Map gives a good idea of what would happen. What's at the centre of the three leaves? Jerusalem! This has been the dream of the Zionists all along with the U.S. out of the game, it would become a reality. The Zionists have made use of the U.S. to subdue any nearby countries that posed a threat and they no longer need it as its pitbull. The country has served its purpose. The current internal conflicts in the United States are designed to encourage Jewish migration to Israel.

The proponents of the multipolar world order have an openly stated depopulation agenda along with draconian surveillance and control. China's social control has long been envied and will serve as a model for the other regions to follow. Much as the U.S. is hated, it is the only country that can offer any resistance to the dystopian nightmare that is unfolding.

Looked at in this way, the U.S./NATO intervention in Ukraine suggests that the proponents of the multipolar world order are being squarely thwarted. The German-Russian alliance promised great benefits to both countries but the war in Ukraine shattered that alliance and Germany is now is a pitiful state with energy costs being too high to sustain its manufacturing industry. 

If enough people in positions of power in the U.S. can wake up to the fact that the country has been infiltrated and undermined by a foreign power, maybe the U.S. can serve as a force for good in the world and push back against the forces of darkness are dominating us.

Death by Doctors

The word "iatrogenic" means "relating to illness caused by medical examination or treatment". Some medical "professionals" might argue that such a word describes an impossible scenario because medical interventions can never cause harm. However, let's look at the following piece of history:

Ignaz Semmelweis was a Hungarian physician who lived in the 19th century and is now known for his work on the importance of handwashing in preventing the spread of infectious diseases.

In the mid-1800s, Semmelweis was working at a hospital in Vienna where he noticed that women were dying from childbed fever at a much higher rate in the maternity ward where doctors and medical students worked, compared to the ward where midwives worked. He proposed that this was due to doctors and medical students performing autopsies and then going to deliver babies without washing their hands, which was transferring infectious material to the women.

However, his ideas were met with ridicule and opposition from the medical community at the time, and he was eventually committed to an insane asylum, where he died at the age of 47. It was not until many years later, after the work of Louis Pasteur and the development of germ theory, that Semmelweis's ideas were recognized as important contributions to the understanding and prevention of infectious diseases.

Well some might argue that that was then and this is now but I don't think much has changed in the early part of the 21st century. At least not in regards to the "ridicule and opposition" directed at any well-intended criticism of the "profession" from those within it or, heavens forbid, from those not within it. What has changed is the power of BIG PHARMA over medical practice, or should that be malpractice. The arrogance of allopathic medicine has soared since the 19th century as well, subjugating and denigrating all alternative medicine practices before it. The motto nowadays might well be ONE WAY, WITH DRUGS.

Side-effects from the drugs people take are no problem because drugs have been developed to treat those side-effects. There's little point saying more. As I've said before my motivation to post to this blog remains low. Once you realise what's going on, it's pointless mentioning specific examples that confirm the rolling-out of the agenda. The only bright light in an otherwise dismal firmament has been listening to music by "Five Times August".

Five Times August is the solo act of singer/songwriter Brad Skistimas. Skistimas has appeared on the FOX Business channel as an expert "Do-It-Yourself" indie artist and featured in Billboard Magazine, Performing Songwriter, Guitar Player, PeopleMagazine, and USA Today. He was the first completely unsigned act to have an album distributed in Walmart stores nationwide with 2007's "The Independent." The music has been featured on many popular TV shows, commercials, and films and tour dates have supported some of the nation's top acts.

In early 2021 Five Times August began releasing a series of protest songs taking aim at Covid-era regulations, the Biden administration, Justin Trudeau, as well as Anthony Fauci with the hit song "Sad Little Man," which reached #1 on several Amazon and Apple Music charts.

Several of the music videos for these tracks have been suppressed and censored on social media platforms like YouTube and Facebook. Despite being restricted by big tech, the videos have been viewed millions of times and press includes prominent features on Glenn Beck, Chad Prather, Del Bigtree's The HighWire, The Federalist, The Post Millennial, RebelNews, and much more.

​Skistimas performed his song "Silent War" on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington DC for 35,000 attendees at the Defeat the Mandates rally on January 23rd 2022, and more recently even had the honor of singing The National Anthem for Dr. Ben Carson and President Donald Trump.

In November 2022 Five Times August released the full length album "Silent War," a compilation featuring all of the recent protest singles. The album reached as high as #5 on Amazon's best selling albums, sitting between mainstream artists Taylor Swift and Bruce Springsteen. The album also reached #1 on Amazon and Apple Music's singer/songwriter and alternative charts.

Read more: fivetimesaugust.com/press.html

ARTIST CONTACT: Brad@fivetimesaugust.com

​MANAGEMENT: Kelly@sevenplacesmusic.net

Relating to Others

The majority of people are consumed with their day to day existence and don't give much thought to the wider world. Their understanding of it is drawn largely from what they absorb via mainstream media. Often they do not take kindly to having their limited world view challenged.

Many westerners are taking medication for physical and psychological problems they have or imagine they have. These medications have been prescribed by doctors that they trust and casting aspersions on the integrity and competency of these pharmaceutical dispensers is likely to provoke hostility. As the old saying goes, it's easy to con people but far more difficult to convince them that they've been conned.

It's best not to bring up controversial matters unless they arise naturally from the conversation. When they do however, it's sometimes hard to resist being controversial. I once remember talking to someone who brought up the topic of Michelle Obama, in what context I can't remember, but I intervened and asked whether he knew that "she" was a "he". That stopped the flow of the conversation. 

I need to remember that I'm 74 years of age, I've been retired for seven years and over that period I've spent a lot of time trying to work out what's  really going on in the world. My naivete back in the days when I did work is embarrassing when I reflect on it. My new found knowledge tends to isolate rather than connect me to others. It's not that I'm superior to others in any way. It's just that I've taken the time to dig a little deeper and what I've discovered hasn't improved the quality of my life.

It seems that living in blissful ignorance has benefits. It's comforting when people believe that Big Government has their interests at heart and that Big Medicine is dedicated to improving their health. The reality of course is darkly different but most people are not willing to accept such a bleak view of the world. They believe that people are intrinsically good and the fact is that they are. It's the people in power that are not but these people are remote and largely faceless. Their dark agenda seems unbelievable when suggested.

Nothing in their experience supports such dark beliefs. The fact checkers are quick to discredit such notions when a superficial investigation is carried out. I remember talking to someone about vaccine damage and every claim that I made was checked for veracity using Snopes, "The definitive Internet reference source for researching urban legends, folklore, myths, rumors, and misinformation". To that person, this reference source was definitely definitive and anything that I said to the contrary was to be dismissed.

So best to keep silent and if the opportunity for comment does arise, it's necessary to assess the person with whom I am conversing. How will they react to what I might say? Some will react with instant ridicule while others may be willing to consider the possibility. Most simply don't want their comfortable world view disturbed. Given the stresses that most people are under, they don't want additional stress. 

Mammon

Mark Moss posted an interesting video on his YouTube channel. It was titled Ukraine War Outcome Decided By JP Morgan? and made mention of the interesting fact that the first Central Bank of England was established in 1694:

The Bank of England was incorporated by act of Parliament in 1694 with the immediate purpose of raising funds to allow the English government to wage war against France in the Low Countries (see War of the Grand Alliance). A royal charter allowed the bank to operate as a joint-stock bank with limited liability. Source.

Remarkable to reflect on the fact that the first Central Bank in the United States was not established until 1913, more that two centuries later. It was all downhill from there for humanity.

Mammon: The Demon of Greed
Source

Let's recall that King James 11 was deposed in 1688 and King William and Queen Mary from Orange took over in 1689. This was a major transformation of the English nobility that preceded the creation of the Bank of England. This seems to have signaled the shift in the financial centre of gravity of Europe from the Low Countries to England, just as it shifted from Spain to the Low Countries in the early 16th century.

The 18th Century certainly marked the rise of England and the decline of the Netherlands. A largely Catholic France challenged England throughout the century but the French Revolution and the subsequent defeat of Napoleon finished that country's hopes of global dominance. In the 19th Century, the financial dominance of Great Britain was unopposed although as the century progressed, the unification of Prussia and the German States under Bismarck saw Germany emerge as a potential threat. 

Germany served the banksters well in the 20th Century. With the establishment of the US Fed in 1913, the financial centre of gravity began to shift again. Mark Moss in his video makes no mention of the Zionists and wisely so as he doesn't want to see his channel banned or demonetized. However, their influence was crucial in shaping the events of the 20th Century and in establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

The Oxford Dictionary defines Mammon as follows:

... wealth regarded as an evil influence or false object of worship and devotion. It was taken by medieval writers as the name of the devil of covetousness, and revived in this sense by Milton: "others have forsaken Mammon in search of something on a more spiritual plane"

As Jesus said, you cannot serve God and Mammon. It is those worshipers of Mammon who are behind the wars that have plagued humanity over the past few centuries and they continue to do so to the present day.

Medieval theologians assigned seven archdemons to the seven deadly sins, and Mammon became the demon of greed. Similarly, Mammon was also sometimes conflated with the Greek god Plutus and depicted as the seductive god of riches. Famous personifications of mammon are found in Ben Jonson’s The Alchemist, John Milton’s Paradise Lost, and Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene. The word eventually gained a secular connotation as an all-consuming pursuit of wealth and was often used in critiques of capitalism or of wealthy individuals. Source.

In an earlier post about The Khazarian Mafia, I outlined the shadowy origins of the people who now run the world. They are the worshipers of Mammon and currently God seems to be in retreat. This of course only seems to be the case. A backlash is growing and many will forsake Mammon in search of a more spiritual plane. 

Moviedom

For me, movies are becoming increasingly unwatchable. Take for instance, my latest attempt that involved "Knock at the Cabin" with screenplay by M. Night Shyamalan and starring Dave Bautista among others. It involved a family consisting of two fathers and an eight year old girl of Chinese ethnicity. This frontal assault on the family by the movie industry is nowadays relentless and gathering momentum. The intent is to redefine the family so that children being raised by two fathers or two mothers is just as acceptable as being raised by the traditional father and mother. 

At the point where the happy parents were picking their baby up from the hospital, I turned the movie off. There's obviously a quota now that movie studios have to adhere to and this involves showing a certain percentage of families in movies as comprising same sex couples. I don't know what the percentage is but it seems sizable. 

Episode 3 of "The Last of Us" featured an entire episode depicting the relationship between two gay guys from start to finish over the course of many years. It bore no relationship to the plot of the story that effectively was put on hold at the end of episode 2 and restarted with episode 4. It was as if the producers used that entire episode to fulfill their quota so that they get on with the story.

While one wonders who really wants to see two bearded men kissing, the real issue is that this plot element was clearly injected into the story line to fulfill a quota. The quota is not only about the makeup of families and the sexual orientation of individuals, it involves the depiction of minorities. In the case of North America, this means a certain percentage of actors need to be black, Asian, Hispanic etc. The recent backlash against the BAFTA winners being almost exclusively white shows that the pressure is on to make awards conform to this quota system as well.

Film makers are under pressure to meet these standards or face the financial consequences. It's similar to the pressure being applied to businesses to adhere to ESG standards. It's all to do with a very small minority of people with inordinate influence deciding what is best for the vast majority of humanity. The sad fact is that this majority is easily lead. I remember watching Sunday Bloody Sunday in the cinema fifty years and the audience groaning in unison at the sight of Peter Finch kissing his male lover.

Most people have little idea of the battle that was fought between Hollywood and the Catholic Church regarding sexual content in movies. It's no secret that Jews run Hollywood, although it's really only acceptable to say so this if you're a Jew. It's also no secret that the Jews pioneered the porn industry. From the early days of Hollywood, the movie moguls were keen to add prurient content to their movies but the Catholic bishops, especially in cities like Boston, threatened a boycott and the moguls caved in. More details of this struggle can be read in "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit" by E. Michael Jones.

This restraint that had been forced upon Hollywood fell apart in the mid-sixties as Catholicism imploded. Excessive violence and disagreeable sexual content increasingly found its way into movies in the late sixties and early seventies. The rot has continued ever since but it's clearly now rotten to the core. You could watch nearly every movie before the mid-sixties with your family and not have them exposed to anything uncomfortable or extreme. That changed as the sixties unfolded.

The main point of this post is that good movies are not made by being forced to adhere to quotas regarding sexual orientation, ethnicity or whatever is deemed necessary by the movie mafia. Film makers should feel free to work with an all white cast of heterosexuals if it suits their purposes and awards should be decided on their merits and not whether they successfully fulfill woke quotas.

Rinse and Repeat

A tweet caught my attention this morning. Figure 1 shows a screenshot.

Figure 1

It's an interesting question to which everyone will have their own opinion but I suspect the percentage very high. I'm not proud of my own history in this regard. I remember watching "An Inconvenient Truth", a documentary released on May 24th 2006, and being suitably impressed. I can only cringe now at my naivete. 

I was still working full time back then and work did consume a lot of my time. I was also drinking and partying after work and generally enjoying life. It was only when I retired that I had unlimited time to delve deeply into what IS going on. Even then, navigating the alt-media had its own hazards. The controlled opposition is everywhere and is cultivated to capture those who know SOMETHING is going on but are not quite sure what.

For those who eschew MSM, the controlled opposition is there to capture and contain that demographic whose members will be fed just enough information to keep them outraged. The emotion however, will never spill out onto the streets or result in political initiatives but will be expended instead within the group of subscribers associated with a particular alt-media hero. The group acts effectively as an echo chamber and nothing of any substance arises that might effect real world outcomes. 

All the lies, deceit and propaganda promulgated by the MSM is best caricatured by visual images. These carry more weight than words which seems to have degenerated into doublespeak. Figure 2 is a good example of what I mean. The picture captures the constant distractions that are put in our way to obscure the deeper agenda that the Khazarian Mafia are pursuing.

Figure 2

Who are the Khazarian Mafia? Well Solzhenitsyn does a good job of saying who they are without saying who they are. See Figure 3.

Figure 3

"The global media is in the hands of the perpetrators" indeed as "the world (remains) ignorant about this enormous crime". The crimes and the criminality continue to the present day and "the greatest human slaughter of all time" may be a work in progress rather than an historical event.