Indeed we live in strange and frightening times. The following header to an article in the Brisbane Times appeared on January 12th 2020:
Young LNP club slammed over protest video shaming drag queens
The article continued:
A group of protesters from the University of Queensland's Liberal National Club have been slammed after a video shaming two Brisbane drag queens emerged on social media. The president of UQ's Liberal National Club, Wilson Gavin, is seen chanting "drag queens are not for kids" alongside other protesters at a public event at the Brisbane Square Library on Sunday.
The two drag queens went by the names Johnny Valkyrie and Diamond Good-rim. The latter's surname is interesting as rimming is a sexual practice involving the licking or kissing of the anus. Later in the article, we learn about who organised the event:
Rainbow Families Queensland, which organised the "drag queen storytime" event, issued a statement apologising to affected families after children were left feeling unsafe.
"Sadly a group of people disrupted the event towards the end, chanting homophobic chants and causing distress to the children and parents attending," the statement read.
"Drag queen storytime is a highly successful event that has been held four times in Brisbane over the past two years, inspired by similar events currently being held in public libraries across the world.
"Love makes a family. There’s no room for hate in our hearts."
There's that word again: homophobic. It's as widely misused as that other popular label: anti-semitic. What was homophobic about the chant? In fact, the Wilson Gavin referred to earlier as being part of the protest is a self-confessed gay who opposed gay marriage during the recent referendum. Tragically, Gavin in now dead.
I heard about his death by apparent suicide while listening to the radio yesterday and today I looked for more information in the Brisbane Times. Oddly, there was no mention of his death at all, at least none that I could find. This was odd given that the protest had attracted so much coverage in this newspaper. I had to go to a UK newspaper to learn more. Here is the header to the article that I found:
Young Liberal at the centre of 'drag queens are not for kids' viral video is found dead in a suspected suicide - as the library performer sends a heartfelt message to his family
It was through this article that I learned that Wilson Gavin was gay. Here is an excerpt from the article:
Mr Gavin, a gay man, previously made the news in 2017 for opposing same sex marriage. The then 19-year-old fronted a 'You Can Say No' rally, saying: 'I support what marriage really is and I'm gay.'
There are no details about the suicide but it would seem that the barrage of criticism directed at this man in the wake of the protest was too much for him to bear. Here is a typical Twitter tweet:
Interesting choice of words. It's disgusting that somebody challenges a drag queen with a surname referring to anus-licking as he promotes "inappropriate sexualisation & gender fluid ideology" to small children via storytelling. Such is the effectiveness of the LGBTIQA+ propaganda that even a gay person who objects to this will be labelled "homophobic".
It is high time that people realised that the LGBTIQA+ agenda is well-funded and does not have the interests of gay and lesbian people at heart. Anyone who opposes this agenda will be pilloried and possibly sacked from his or her job for engaging in hate speech. Indeed we live in strange and frightening times.
It was only when watching 2017's " Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri" that I realised how anti-Catholic Hollywood had become. The Jewish-controlled media is saturated with concerns about anti-Semitism but there is nary a mention made of instances of anti-Catholicism. In the movie just mentioned, a Catholic priest comes to visit the character played by Frances McDormand and she launches into a foul-mouthed tirade. It is described in Catholic News Service as follows:
Earlier in the proceedings, a priest visits Mildred (a recently lapsed Catholic) to remonstrate with her about the strife her billboards are causing. In response, she launches into a tirade in which she compares Catholic clergymen to the members of violent street gangs and applies the principle of collective guilt to claim that even good priests are complicit in their evil peers' crimes against children.
This cruel and unreasonable denunciation will rightly outrage the sensibilities of Catholic moviegoers. Add to it the picture's ill-advised treatment of suicide and a climactic sequence that toys with justifying murderous revenge -- though the outcome is left unclear -- and the verdict on this aesthetically accomplished piece of cinema must be that it is spiritually unfit for all.
The film contains anti-Catholicism, a skewed view of suicide, an ambivalent treatment of vigilantism, some violence with brief gore, numerous profanities and at least one milder oath as well as pervasive rough and frequent crude language. The Catholic News Service classification is O, morally offensive. The Motion Picture Association of America rating is R, restricted with under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.
Mildred's outburst is clearly inserted for shock value as it does not add to the storyline. The relationship between Hollywood and the Catholic Church goes back a long way, as I discovered when reading E. Michael Jones' book "The Jewish Revolutionary Influence and its Impact on World History". To quote from page 776 of that book:
The outcry against Hollywood's subversion of morals was so great that federal, state and local legislation was proposed as an antidote. To head off legislation, Hollywood's Jews in 1934 entered into a voluntary agreement, the Production Code, with the Legion of Decency, a Catholic operation. The Catholics had forced the issue by organising boycotts when the film industry was reeling.
Henry Ford admired Catholic resistance to Jewish Hollywood, even before imposition of the Code. Unlike Protestant clergymen who were regularly ridiculed in Hollywood films, "The Catholic clergy very soon made themselves felt in opposition to this abuse of their priestly dignity, and as a result of their vigorous resentment the Jew climbed down. You now never see a priest made light of on the screen. But the Protestant clergyman is still the elongated, snivelling, bilious hypocrite of anti-Christian caricatures."
How things have changed. The Production Code terminated in 1965. Joe Breen, who oversaw the Production Code for 20 years had this to say about the Hollywood elite (again I'm quoting from page 776 of the book):
They are simply a rotten bunch of vile people with no respect for anything beyond the making of money.... Here [in Hollywood] we have Paganism rampant and in its most virulent form. Drunkenness and debauchery are commonplace. Sexual perversion is rampant,'" any number of our directors and stars are perverts.... These Jews seem to think of nothing but moneymaking and sexual indulgence. The vilest kind of sin is a common indulgence hereabouts and the men and women who engage in this sort of business are the men and women who decide what the film fare of the nation is to be. They and they alone make the decision. Ninety-five percent of these folks are Jews of an Eastern European lineage. They are, probably, the scum of the earth.
Strong words and probably more true today than it was then but, oddly enough considering today's sensitivities, the Hollywood barons of the time didn't regard Joe Breen as an anti-Semite:
Joe Breen, who had railed against the immorality of the Hollywood Jews, had learned from them, and they from him. They would not have asked him to run RKO Pictures if he had been truly anti-Semitic. They would not have flown him here and there. They would not have invited him into their homes. And they certainly would not have given him an Academy Award. He had convictions. He was a fighter, but he didn't hate.
This of course is the point. One can criticise Jewish control of Hollywood or the media or American foreign policy without hating Jews. Of course, organisations like the Anti Defamation League or ADL view any explicit mention of Jewish control or any criticism of Jews or Israel as anti-Semiticism. Imagine the outcry if Mildred launched into a similar tirade against Rabbinical Judaism. Frances McDormand, who comes from a Protestant background, is married to Joel Coen (one half of the famous Coen brothers).
Lately I've grown increasingly disillusioned with Hollywood movies, Netflix series and the like and so last night I chose to watch a Swedish science fiction movie, Aniara. However, it was more of the same Hollywood crap. To quote from a Rotten Tomatoes review:
ANIARA is the story of one of the many spaceships used for transporting Earth's fleeing population to their new home-planet Mars. But just as the ship leaves the destroyed Earth, she collides with space junk and is thrown off her course. The passengers slowly realize that they'll never be able to return. The protagonist, MR, runs a room where a sentient computer allows humans to experience near-spiritual memories of the Earth. As the ship drifts further into the endless void more and more passengers are in need of MRs services. Pressure builds on MR as she is the only one who can keep the growing insanity and lethal depression at bay. In Aniara's inexorable journey towards destruction there is a warning that cannot be emphasised enough. There's only one Earth. It's time to take responsibility for our actions.
Having just recently completed Douglas Reed's voluminous "The Controversy of Zion" (see my earlier post), I've just now started on E. Michael Jones' book titled "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit". I was watching a YouTube video in which Jones was being interviewed by an Irishman who was not happy about the moral decay and the level of government debt within his country. In the show notes for the video, "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit" was mentioned and, when I checked my e-library, I noticed that I had a copy that I'd previously downloaded from the Internet Archive.
This is the same source that I used to download my copy of "The Controversy of Zion". Addendum: I've since discovered that the Internet Archive contains only selections from "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit" and not the entire 1000+ page book.
So who is E. Michael Jones? Well, what better source to draw upon than the Anti-Defamation League or ADL where, to his credit, he attracts a three page PDF article. Douglas Reed has no such entry, probably because he has long passed (1978) and the organisation does not want to draw any attention to his excellent book. Jones however, is still very much alive and in fact is only slighter older than me, having been born on May 4th 1948 in Philadelphia.
E. Michael Jones is an anti-Semitic Catholic writer who promotes the view that Jews are dedicated to propagating and perpetrating attacks on the Catholic Church and moral standards, social stability, and political order throughout the world. He portrays the Jewish religion as inherently treacherous and belligerent towards Christianity. He describes Jews as “outlaws and subversives [who use] religion as a cover for social revolution,” and claims that Judaism possesses “a particularly malignant spirit.” Jones also imagines the contemporary world, with its social ills, as having been cast in the imprint of Judaism, characterizing 21st-century civilization as “a Jewish world run on commercial principles.” He also identifies this “Jewish modernity” as representing “blood, the law, calculation, and hate.” In the tradition of conspiracy theorists, Jones credits Jews with orchestrating occurrences as varied and disconnected from the Jewish experience as the Protestant Reformation and the French Revolution. He also blames Jews for Bolshevism, Freemasonry, and an alleged contemporary “Jewish takeover of American culture.” Jones reaches for tenuous connections to paint “the Jews” as inherently wicked and prone to colluding openly or secretly to threaten other populations around them. Jones argues that mass killings of Jews throughout history have been understandable reactions to Jewish beliefs and behavior. He goes so far as to justify Eastern European pogroms and even the Nazi Holocaust on these grounds. As he wrote in a 2003 Culture Wars article, “[T]he Nazi attempt to exterminate the Jews was a reaction to Jewish Messianism (in the form of Bolshevism) every bit as much as the Chmielnicki pogroms flowed from the excesses of the Jewish tax farmers in the Ukraine.”
Predictably, he is branded anti-semitic and the article concludes with details of his links to extremist individuals and organisation. It's also mentioned that:
According to autobiographical sources, Jones initially abandoned the Catholic faith of his upbringing at age 20, embraced the counterculture of the 1960s, and spent his honeymoon stuck in traffic on the way to the Woodstock music festival. In the 1970s, Jones spent time in a rural area of Germany teaching English. Jones reconnected with Catholicism while living in Germany ...
So we are similar in that we both abandoned Catholicism in our youth. I was aged 15 but I never reconnected with Catholicism. The ADL however, does not brand Jones as a holocaust denier because he has not explicitly denied that it occurred. Denying the holocaust is the line the sand that any author or public figure must not cross if he or she wishes to avoid mainstream rejection. Even to challenge any of the details of this alleged historical event is anathema and, in certain European countries, to do so is to risk fines and imprisonment.
Of course, the hierarchy of the Catholic Church is quick to distance itself from Jones and his views about world Jewry. Jones is vocal also is his condemnation of the LGBT agenda. Here is his 4th of July message:
THE VIDEO HAS BEEN TAKEN DOWN BY YOUTUBE: SAY NO MORE
Personally, I doubt whether Catholicism can do much to avert the current moral degeneracy. Islam offers more resistance but as Gabriele Kuby, author of "The Global Revolution" says in an interview (I'm quoting from the transcript so it's a rough read):
... it’s a plan of social engineering, all the money of this world is behind it … it can be manipulated and manufactured and since you have the powers of this world behind this agenda … if you uproot people, no national identity, no religious identity, no family identity … they don’t even know if they’re man or woman … you can do anything with them … I think actually there is a world government approach ...
This of course is the point: a massive and sustained campaign of social engineering is underway. To focus simply on vaccinations or climate alarmism or moral degeneracy or the banksters, 5G telecommunications or the rogue state of Israel is to miss the point. All are connected and the end game is a Zionist world government with its capital in Jerusalem. Zionism is the centre around which everything else orbits:
vaccinations are not intended to improve the health of children but instead are intended to undermine their health by creating a plethora of chronic, lifelong disorders that place severe emotional and financial burdens on families. Any children that survive unscathed into adulthood are likely to have a dim view of parenthood.
climate alarmism is not intended to improve the environment but instead is intended to increase the stress on families by increasing the cost of electricity and other utilities and to help bankrupt nation states by requiring them to meet bogus green energy standards.
the LGBT agenda is not intended to improve the lot of the individuals that comprise this group but instead is intended to undermine family, religion and moral values so that individuals are more susceptible to manipulation. The intrusion of the LGBT agenda into school curricula is producing a backlash amongst people who might ordinarily be tolerant of gay and lesbian lifestyles.
the banksters are legalised criminals but behind them is a shadowy elite whose goal is not to amass more money but more control. It already has control of the global financial system and it is seeking to ultimately control everybody on the planet, albeit after reducing the size of the global population to a tenth of its current size.
5G telecommunication is being rolled out around the world with unseemly haste and along with the IoT will be a powerful tool to monitor individual behaviour and obliterate privacy. This is its primary purpose.
Israel does not represent those who lay claim to be Jewish. It is a rogue state set up to promote the interests of a tiny elite that is exploiting the Jewish people both inside and outside the country. While expanding the power of Israel is central to the Zionist master plan, the plan could still proceed without it.
It should be remembered that vaccinations, climate alarmism, the LGBT movement, the financial system, 5G telecommunications and the state of Israel are each a prong in the multi-pronged Zionist strategy to control the planet. I'm sure that there are many who oppose vaccinations but who believe in the claims of the climate alarmists. There are many who acquiesce to the LGBT agenda but oppose the implementation of 5G on the basis of health rather than privacy concerns. The brazen extent of the social engineering needs to be borne in mind if its incessant, insidious propaganda is to be resisted.
To quote from that "bastion of truth", Wikipedia says:
Propaganda is information that is not objective and is used primarily to influence an audience and further an agenda, often by presenting facts selectively to encourage a particular synthesis or perception, or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information that is presented.
There are some who say there is an agenda on the part of the Global Elite to reduce the population of the planet to about half a billion. If this were true how would the elite go about achieving this, while ensuring that its own members were not culled in the same proportion as the general population? If the unwashed masses have on average fewer than 2.1 babies, then simple demographics kicks in to gradually reduce the population. Once babies are born, an insane assault on their immune systems via relentless vaccinations ensures they will be impaired in one way or another, whether through allergies, autism, asthma, auto-immune diseases, ADHD or whatever. This makes parenting a nightmare. Try it once (making a baby) and you probably won't want to try it again. Mandatory childhood vaccinations are not far off and most aware couples, faced with the prospect of watching helplessly as their babies are abused by forced vaccinations, will choose not to have any. Zero (babies) works especially well in reducing the population.
Same sex couples also work well in that respect and hence the aggressive push for LGBT "rights". I certainly don't want to see individuals who identify as LGBT persecuted or discriminated against but it's clear that the movement has been hijacked by hidden forces with the social engineering agenda of promoting the LGBT lifestyle as normal and natural. Challenging this agenda ensures you will be branded "homophobic" just as challenging the vaccine agenda earns you the sobriquet of "anti-vaxxer". There is no middle ground where LGBT rights are concerned just as with vaccinations. You have to take a side. Any hesitation or equivocation puts you on the other side. With the imminent roll-out of 5G, it is likely that male fertility rates will decline even more, so that even heterosexual couples who decide to have a baby may find that they are unable to do so.
Of course, populations are already declining in many developed countries while those in developing countries are still increasing. This population imbalance ensures increased immigration from developing to developing countries. Migrant intakes help to reduce the sense of identification with the host nation and predispose towards a sense of being a global citizen. Hasn't identification with nation states only led to endless warfare? Identifying as a global citizen will put an end to all of that supposedly. The Global Elite's agenda and propaganda are subtle but relentless, aiming always to erode the connections that individuals have with their sex, country, ethnicity, religion and more.
The long game is being played, for now at least, and meanwhile the children of the Global Elite will not be receiving the same vaccinations as the masses. They may not be receiving any vaccinations at all or maybe just placebos. They will not eat the same polluted food and water as the masses. They will be the first to receive the benefits of advances in medical technology. They will thrive and become our new genomic overlords just as their parents and grandparents are already our economic overlords. Of course, plans may well be in place to accelerate the depopulation process. An earlier blog post explores one possible way in which this could be achieved. In this I said:
This was the first I had heard of such a virus. If it is effective, then the implications are chilling if one believes the global elite are intent on reducing the population of the planet to around 500 million people. If a similar virus targeting humans was engineered, it could be easily added to the aggressively promoted annual flu vaccinations that many people receive.
The message keeps getting repeated: there are just too many people and there are not enough resources to support them. There is so much human activity that it is warming the planet, leading us toward a climate apocalypse. The propaganda is relentless and quite effective.
