Jewish Rebellion Against Rome

There are many Israelis who are fervently intent on rebuilding the Temple in Jerusalem. To understand their motivation, it is important to have some understanding of the history associated with this temple  and the struggle of the Jewish people against their Roman oppressors at the time. Here is a quote from the Ancient History Encyclopaedia on the Bar-Kochba Revolt:

The Bar Kochba Revolt (132–136 CE) was the third and final war between the Jewish people and the Roman Empire. It followed a long period of tension and violence, marked by the first Jewish uprising of 66-70 CE, which ended with the destruction of the Second Temple, and the Kitos War (115-117 CE). In many ways, the Bar Kochba Revolt differed markedly from its predecessors. For the first time, the Jews presented a united front against Roman forces and fought underneath a single charismatic leader, the eponymous Simon Bar Kochba (also given as Shimon Bar-Cochba, Bar Kokhba, Ben-Cozba, Cosiba or Coziba). It was marked as well by strong religious passions, with many apparently believing that Bar Kochba was the promised messiah who would lead the Jewish people to final victory against their enemies.

ANIARA

It was only when watching 2017's " Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri" that I realised how anti-Catholic Hollywood had become. The Jewish-controlled media is saturated with concerns about anti-Semitism but there is nary a mention made of instances of anti-Catholicism. In the movie just mentioned, a Catholic priest comes to visit the character played by Frances McDormand and she launches into a foul-mouthed tirade. It is described in Catholic News Service as follows:

Earlier in the proceedings, a priest visits Mildred (a recently lapsed Catholic) to remonstrate with her about the strife her billboards are causing. In response, she launches into a tirade in which she compares Catholic clergymen to the members of violent street gangs and applies the principle of collective guilt to claim that even good priests are complicit in their evil peers' crimes against children. 

This cruel and unreasonable denunciation will rightly outrage the sensibilities of Catholic moviegoers. Add to it the picture's ill-advised treatment of suicide and a climactic sequence that toys with justifying murderous revenge -- though the outcome is left unclear -- and the verdict on this aesthetically accomplished piece of cinema must be that it is spiritually unfit for all. 

The film contains anti-Catholicism, a skewed view of suicide, an ambivalent treatment of vigilantism, some violence with brief gore, numerous profanities and at least one milder oath as well as pervasive rough and frequent crude language. The Catholic News Service classification is O, morally offensive. The Motion Picture Association of America rating is R, restricted with under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.

Mildred's outburst is clearly inserted for shock value as it does not add to the storyline. The relationship between Hollywood and the Catholic Church goes back a long way, as I discovered when reading E. Michael Jones' book "The Jewish Revolutionary Influence and its Impact on World History". To quote from page 776 of that book:

The outcry against Hollywood's subversion of morals was so great that federal, state and local legislation was proposed as an antidote. To head off legislation, Hollywood's Jews in 1934 entered into a voluntary agreement, the Production Code, with the Legion of Decency, a Catholic operation. The Catholics had forced the issue by organising boycotts when the film industry was reeling. 

Henry Ford admired Catholic resistance to Jewish Hollywood, even before imposition of the Code. Unlike Protestant clergymen who were regularly ridiculed in Hollywood films, "The Catholic clergy very soon made themselves felt in opposition to this abuse of their priestly dignity, and as a result of their vigorous resentment the Jew climbed down. You now never see a priest made light of on the screen. But the Protestant clergyman is still the elongated, snivelling, bilious hypocrite of anti-Christian caricatures."

How things have changed. The Production Code terminated in 1965. Joe Breen, who oversaw the Production Code for 20 years had this to say about the Hollywood elite (again I'm quoting from page 776 of the book):

They are simply a rotten bunch of vile people with no respect for anything beyond the making of money.... Here [in Hollywood] we have Paganism rampant and in its most virulent form. Drunkenness and debauchery are commonplace. Sexual perversion is rampant,'" any number of our directors and stars are perverts.... These Jews seem to think of nothing but moneymaking and sexual indulgence. The vilest kind of sin is a common indulgence hereabouts and the men and women who engage in this sort of business are the men and women who decide what the film fare of the nation is to be. They and they alone make the decision. Ninety-five percent of these folks are Jews of an Eastern European lineage. They are, probably, the scum of the earth.

Strong words and probably more true today than it was then but, oddly enough considering today's sensitivities, the Hollywood barons of the time didn't regard Joe Breen as an anti-Semite:

Joe Breen, who had railed against the immorality of the Hollywood Jews, had learned from them, and they from him. They would not have asked him to run RKO Pictures if he had been truly anti-Semitic. They would not have flown him here and there. They would not have invited him into their homes. And they certainly would not have given him an Academy Award. He had convictions. He was a fighter, but he didn't hate.

This of course is the point. One can criticise Jewish control of Hollywood or the media or American foreign policy without hating Jews. Of course, organisations like the Anti Defamation League or ADL view any explicit mention of Jewish control or any criticism of Jews or Israel as anti-Semiticism. Imagine the outcry if Mildred launched into a similar tirade against Rabbinical Judaism. Frances McDormand, who comes from a Protestant background, is married to Joel Coen (one half of the famous Coen brothers). 

Lately I've grown increasingly disillusioned with Hollywood movies, Netflix series and the like and so last night I chose to watch a Swedish science fiction movie, Aniara. However, it was more of the same Hollywood crap. To quote from a Rotten Tomatoes review:

ANIARA is the story of one of the many spaceships used for transporting Earth's fleeing population to their new home-planet Mars. But just as the ship leaves the destroyed Earth, she collides with space junk and is thrown off her course. The passengers slowly realize that they'll never be able to return. The protagonist, MR, runs a room where a sentient computer allows humans to experience near-spiritual memories of the Earth. As the ship drifts further into the endless void more and more passengers are in need of MRs services. Pressure builds on MR as she is the only one who can keep the growing insanity and lethal depression at bay. In Aniara's inexorable journey towards destruction there is a warning that cannot be emphasised enough. There's only one Earth. It's time to take responsibility for our actions.

In short, more propaganda to support the Global Warming Alarmists who believe that humanity is headed for disaster because of uncontrolled carbon dioxide emissions. The protagonist also gets involved in a lesbian relationship and her lover becomes pregnant after a group sex orgy. Together they raise the resulting infant although it doesn't end well. Again more propaganda, this time in support of the LBGT agenda that disparages the cliché of a mother and a father as being so yesterday and proposes that mother and mother or father and father are equally viable options. It seems that Hollywood has infected the entire world.

Theodor Herzl: Victim of Talmudic Magic?

As I continue my reading of Douglas Reed's The Controversy of Zion, I'm grateful for the insights he provides into Zionism and its running mate, Communism. There is material in this book for many, many posts once I've completed it and, at which point, I'll probably start reading it again.

What caught my attention was this part of his comments on Herzl:

When he returned to address the Sixth Congress of his World Zionist Organization his fate rose to meet him in the form of a compact mass of Russian Jews no longer merely "humiliating" to him, but menacing. At this moment of his fiasco he thought he had the ace of trumps in his pocket and he produced it. As a result of those interviews in London and of the "irresistible pressure" which supported him, the British Government had offered Dr. Herzl of the Vienna Neue Freie Presse a territory in Africa, Uganda! 

Yet the trump card proved to be a deuce. 295 delegates voted to accept the offer, but 175 rejected it; clearly Dr. Herzl did not speak for "all Jews". The great majority of the 175 Noes came from the Jews of Russia. The huddled Jewish throngs there had hailed Herzl as the Messiah; these 175 emissaries of the Eastern rabbinate imprecated him, for Uganda meant the ruin of their plan. They cast themselves on the floor in the traditional attitude of mourning for the dead or for the destruction of the temple. One of them, a woman, called the world-famous Dr. Herzl "a traitor" and when he was gone tore down the map of Uganda from behind the speakers' dais. 

If what he said and wrote was fully candid, Dr. Herzl never understood why the Jewish emissaries from Russia refused to consider any other place than Palestine, and if that is so he must have been most guileless. He had built up his entire movement on the claim that "a place of refuge" was directly needed for "persecuted Jews", and these were the Jews of Russia; Jews were fully emancipated elsewhere. If that was true, then any good place would do, and he had now procured one for them; moreover, if any of them preferred to stay in Russia, and his negotiations with the Russian Government succeeded, they could have all they wanted in Russia too! 

From the point of view of the Talmudic rabbinate in Russia the matter was entirely different. They, too, had built up the legend of "persecution in Russia", while they worked against emancipation there, but this was for the purpose of fulfilling the ancient Law, which meant possession of Palestine and all subsequent things that the Law ordained. Acceptance of Uganda would have meant Doomsday for Talmudic Judaism. 

Dr. Weizmann describes Dr. Herzl's final humiliation. After the vote Herzl went to see the Jews from Russia, who had turned their backs on him and walked out, in their committee room. "He came in, looking haggard and exhausted. He was received in dead silence. Nobody rose from his seat to greet him, nobody applauded him when he ended. . . It was probably the first time that Herzl was thus received at any Zionist gathering: he, the idol of all Zionists". 

It was also the last time. Within the year Dr. Herzl was dead, at the age of forty-four. No conclusion can be offered about his death. Judaist writers refer to it in cryptic terms. The Jewish Encyclopaedia says it was the result of what he endured and other authorities make similarly obscure, though significant, allusions. Those who during the centuries have been the object of anathema or excommunication by the ruling sect often have died soon and wretchedly. The student comes to feel that in this matter he approaches mysterious things, closed to all ordinary research." 

 The closing part of this quote is most interesting and I'll reprint it below:

Those who during the centuries have been the object of anathema or excommunication by the ruling sect often have died soon and wretchedly. The student comes to feel that in this matter he approaches mysterious things, closed to all ordinary research.

What Reed doesn't mention here but which that "bastion of truth" (as James Corbett refers to Wikipedia) does is:

He married Julie Nachauer in 1889 and they had three children. However, all three had unhappy lives. His first daughter, Paulina, died in 1930 of a heroin overdone. His son, Hans, committed suicide at age 39 on the day of his sister's funeral. The youngest, Margaritha (Trude), died in a concentration camp in 1943. Theodor's only grandson, Stephan Theodor Neumann committed suicide in 1946 at age 28. He had been an active Zionist. 

Figure 1

Clearly we are in the realm of Talmudic and Babylonian magic which is why I've included the photograph shown in Figure 1 with its Assyrian symbols and Sepiroth. I don't know the provenance of the photo but here is the link to the February 2017 article in which it appeared, titled Judaism: Satanism, Sorcery and Black Magic on the website VETERAN TODAY Journal for the Clandestine Community. 

In the article, reference is made to a book by E. Michael Jones titled The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History that looks like it may be interesting as Douglas Reed's book is proving to be. I've downloaded it from The Internet Archive, where it's available for free, and here is the link. Returning to the article, the following excerpt is of interest:

The Kabbalah (“reception”), is a series of books of magic and mysticism. The canon has not been strictly defined although the rabbinic consensus names the Zohar as the most important volume. Another book, Sefer Yetzirah is a guide to black magic in Judaism. Zoharic studies in English have been advanced exponentially by the recent publication of Daniel Matt’s uncensored translation* of all of the volumes traditionally associated with the Zohar. The descriptive term “Satanic” is overworked in this age of the Internet and “desktop” publishing. We do not propose to employ it casually or imprecisely. The Kabbalah is fundamentally Satanic in its theological orientation … The Kabbalah is attributed to the Rabbi Shimon ben Yoahi who wrote, “Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed.” Like the Talmud of Babylon, it is reputed to be derived form an Oral Law which God gave to Moses on Sinai in addition to the Written Law. 

* available for loan from https://archive.org/details/zohar00dani 

So black magic is certainly, though not exclusively, a part of Judaism and it would seem that the elders of the Ostjuden were particularly proficient in its execution (or maybe Herzl and his offspring were just plain unlucky). By the way, the term Ostjuden means "Eastern Jews", in German, and was the generic term for Yiddish speaking Jews from Eastern European countries that immigrated to Germany and Austria. Vienna as the capital of the Austrian-Hungarian Monarchy attracted immigrants from all parts of the Empire. Jews from Eastern Europe moved to Vienna during two immigration waves. Source.

See my earlier post on the Khazars where I write:

So it would seem that the Khazar hypothesis has been accepted even by the Israelis. The references at the beginning of my post to the Talmud and Babylon reminded me of two videos (Meet the Rothschilds' Bosses 1 and 2) that I watched recently that were posted by an Israeli woman named Doreen Dotan. This is the link to her YouTube channel. She claims that it was the Jews who stayed behind in Babylon, after their exile to that region, who are responsible for the Talmud and the worship of Babylonian deities. She claims this group and their descendants have perverted Judaism.

The Big Picture

I was watching a YouTube video about the recent mysterious limousine accident in the United States. In the comments, I read the following:

KILL TV. Get past the cognitive dissonance & simply accept that the establishment & so called "government" are nothing but a glorified crime syndicate. Then it all makes sense & eliminates the need to endlessly analyze & speculate about TV "news". Even when local tragedies are real, you've got to realize there's a reason why some events get massive attention & others in different places are never even mentioned on mainstream news.

Quite an insightful overview I thought. It's easy to get bogged down in delving into this or not suspicious event and lose sight of the big picture which essentially is that we live in a psychopathocracy (the rule of persons who lack a basic ability to empathise with others, to feel their pain or to feel guilty about harming them) or at best a kakistocracy (a system of government which is run by the worst, least qualified, or most unscrupulous citizens. The word was coined as early as the seventeenth century). 

I've written about psychopathocracy before: see this blog post (in May of 2008).

On further investigation, KILL TV turned out to be a new initiative aimed at bypassing Internet censorship (double click to enlarge image):

Here is a link to a video describing what the website is all about. At the moment, the founders are trying to collect US$150,000 to start things up. I've left my email address and will be notified of developments. 

Yesterday 108Morris108 made a reference to Chabad Lubavitch. I'd not heard of the group before so I had to do some investigation. I watched the following video that sheds some light on the influence that this group has in the world. Their influence is impressive.

Now that I'm aware of the group and their influence I can follow their activities more closely.

The Khazars

The following comment to a video I watched caught my attention:

Satanism is based on Rabbinical Talmudism, a Babylonian Magick of biblical Pharisees, worship of Baal, Baphomet etc., the basis for Judaism, doctrine Jesus Christ railed against. Jews are not the biblical Hebrews they claim to be. They are impostors who inverted reality and inserted themselves into biblical stories. They are Khazars.

The comment came with a link attached to a blog post in The Times of Israel, dated March 18th 2014. The post has this header:

Leaked report: Israel acknowledges Jews in fact Khazars; Secret plan for reverse migration to Ukraine 

It then goes to say that:

It is well known that, sometime in the eighth to ninth centuries, the Khazars, a warlike Turkic people, converted to Judaism and ruled over a vast domain in what became southern Russia and Ukraine. What happened to them after the Russians destroyed that empire around the eleventh century has been a mystery. Many have speculated that the Khazars became the ancestors of Ashkenazi Jews. 

Arabs have long cited the Khazar hypothesis in attempts to deny a Jewish historical claim to the land of Israel. During the UN debate over Palestine Partition, Chaim Weizmann responded, sarcastically: “lt is very strange. All my life I have been a Jew, felt like a Jew, and I now learn that I am a Khazar.” In a more folksy vein, Prime Minister Golda Meir famously said:  “Khazar, Schmazar. There is no Khazar people. I knew no Khazars In Kiev. Or Milwaukee. Show me these Khazars of whom you speak.” 

Contrarian Hungarian ex-communist and scientist Arthur Koestler brought the Khazar hypothesis to a wider audience with The Thirteenth Tribe (1976), in the hope that disproving a common Jewish “racial” identity would end antisemitism. Clearly, that hope has not been fulfilled. Most recently, left-wing Israeli historian Shlomo Sand’s The Invention of the Jewish People took Koestler’s thesis in a direction he had not intended, arguing that because Jews were a religious community descended from converts they do not constitute a nation or need a state of their own. 

Scientists, however, dismissed the Khazar hypothesis because the genetic evidence did not add up. Until now. In 2012, Israeli researcher Eran Elhaik published a study claiming to prove that Khazar ancestry is the single largest element in the Ashkenazi gene pool. Sand declared himself vindicated, and progressive organs such as Haaretz and The Forward trumpeted the results. 

Israel seems finally to have thrown in the towel. A blue-ribbon team of scholars from leading research institutions and museums has just issued a secret report to the government, acknowledging that European Jews are in fact Khazars.

So it would seem that the Khazar hypothesis has been accepted even by the Israelis. The references at the beginning of my post to the Talmud and Babylon reminded me of two videos (Meet the Rothschilds' Bosses 1 and 2) that I watched recently that were posted by an Israeli woman named Doreen Dotan. This is the link to her YouTube channel. She claims that it was the Jews who stayed behind in Babylon, after their exile to that region, who are responsible for the Talmud and the worship of Babylonian deities. She claims this group and their descendants have perverted Judaism.

All this is confusing of course to someone with little knowledge of the history of Judaism. There is an article in Wikipedia about the Babylonian Talmud. Here is an excerpt:

The Babylonian Talmud (Talmud Bavli) consists of documents compiled over the period of Late Antiquity (3rd to 5th centuries). During this time the most important of the Jewish centres in Mesopotamia, a region called "Babylonia" in Jewish sources and later known as Iraq, were Nehardea, Nisibis (modern Nusaybin), Mahoza (al-Mada'in, just to the south of what is now Baghdad), Pumbedita (near present-day al Anbar Governorate), and the Sura Academy, probably located about 60 km south of Baghdad.  

Of course there is the Jerusalem Talmud and lots more to make sense of. It's best that I read the following book that I have on my Kindle:

After doing that, I should have a better overview of Jews and Judaism. I'm sure that there won't be much mention of Satanism and its connection to Radical Talmudism but at least I'll have a foundation from which to explore further. The takeaway from all this is that terms like Jew and Judaism are not straightforward. When combined with Zionism and Israel, things become more complex still. I realise I know very little.

Theodor Herzl

I've started researching about Theodor Herzl, a Hungarian Jew, who is regarded as the spiritual father of Israel and a pivotal figure in the rise of Zionism. From my reading thus far, he seems to have started out believing that the integration of Jews into European society was possible but later abandoned that idea and embraced the idea of a Jewish homeland. Argentina, Uganda and the Sinai were all considered at various points but eventually Palestine was decided upon.

Theodor presided over the first Zionist Conference in (interestingly) Basel, Switzerland, in 1897 and remained president until his death in 1904 at the young age of 44. He garnered a lot of international support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine but couldn't persuade the Ottoman sultan to allow Zionists access, despite offering to help pay off the empire's debts. It has been proposed that the Zionists decided the Ottoman empire had to be dismantled because of the sultan's intransigence. Palestine was part of the Ottoman empire at that time.

Many Jews of the time were not in favour of a Jewish homeland and some are still not. On the Torah Jews website, the following points are made regarding an upcoming seminar:

There was no classroom big enough, so they rented a stadium. Masses of authentic Torah Jews are expected to fill the Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum to capacity this Sunday at 4:00 PM to hear major rabbis lecture on the incompatibility of Judaism and Zionism. 

The lectures will emphasize the differences between Judaism – a religion centered around belief and adherence to the precepts of the Torah – and Zionism, a militaristic political movement designed to transform Jewish identity from religious to national, centered around a land, language, and army.

Since the state of Israel was established in 1948, Zionists have touted it as the “Jewish state,” and arrogated to it the role of representative of world Jewry. 

Opponents of Israel are silenced by Zionists with the accusation that they are “anti-Semites,” and Israel's politicians are portrayed as leaders of world Jewry. Jewish opponents of Zionism have been branded “self-hating Jews,” and Israel has employed various means to coerce and convince Jews to identify with Israel as their state. Their methods of coercion include various forms of discrimination against the Orthodox anti-Zionist lifestyle. Most recently, media has attached religious significance to the move of the American embassy to Jerusalem. 

This Sunday’s convention will be an important opportunity to hear the other side of the story, the position of Torah Jews on these subjects. Besides their opposition to the ideology of Jewish nationalism, the lecturers will also explain the traditional Orthodox Jewish view that Jews are forbidden to wage war but must live among the nations of the world in peace and with utmost loyalty, and that we must resist and fight against the draft law with all means at our disposal. 

Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro, noted lecturer and author on both Zionism and Judaism, says "Israel’s referring to itself as the Jewish state is a form of collective identity theft, since Jewishness is a purely religious identity, not political or national." He explains, "It is crucial for people to realise that Israel's identification as the Jewish state is a unilateral claim of Zionism. Judaism says the Jewish people are members of a religion and have no state except those in which they reside." Rabbi Shapiro will be available during the event to answer questions for the press and other interested parties.

Getting back to Theodor however, he detested Jewish bankers (Finanzjuden) and so that's a point in his favour. He was clearly an idealist and believed that the Jews and Palestians could live together in harmony. He wrote a novel called Altneuland (Old New Land) in which this sort of harmony is achieved. Regarding a possible settlement in Argentina, he displayed idealistic naïveté when he wrote:

"When we occupy the land, we shall bring immediate benefits to the state that receives us. We must expropriate gently the private property on the estates assigned to us. We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our country. The property owners will come over to our side. Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discretely and circumspectly ... It goes without saying that we shall respectfully tolerate persons of other faiths and protect their property, their honor, and their freedom with the harshest means of coercion. This is another area in which we shall set the entire world a wonderful example ... Should there be many such immovable owners in individual areas [who would not sell their property to us], we shall simply leave them there and develop our commerce in the direction of other areas which belong to us" 

The Complete Diaries of Theodor Herzl, vol. 1 (New York: Herzl Press and Thomas Yoseloff, 1960), pp. 88, 90 hereafter Herzl diaries.

As we now know, the private property (in Palestine) was expropriated, not gently but violently, and it continues to the present day. I think Theodor would be aghast to see how his beloved Israel has turned into a rogue state, the most violent and dangerous nation on Earth. Historically, I want to investigate to what extent the Zionists fomented the First World War and the Bolshevik revolution. It seems that they were deeply involved and if so, then again what would Theodor have thought of the millions who perished because of the machinations of a political entity that he had helped create? Perhaps he has long ago turned in his grave on Mount Herzl. Did the Finanzjuden manage to wrest control of the movement after his death and set about ensuring the destruction of the Ottoman Empire? I'm still exploring that possibility.

At a personal level, he married a woman called Julie Naschauer and they had three children: Paulina, Hans and Margaritha (Trude). Paulina died of a heroin overdose in 1930 at the age of 40. Hans committed suicide on the day of her sister's funeral at age 39. Trude died in a concentration camp in 1943. She had a son, Stephen Theodore Neumann, who was born in 1918 and who became a committed Zionist (unlike his mother or aunt and uncle). Unfortunately, he committed suicide in 1946 by jumping from the Massachusetts Avenue Bridge in Washington, D.C. It is certainly a very sad family history.

I'll make my way through Theodor Herzl's Diaries and see what I discover. I'm also making my way through the voluminous but fascinating The International Jew The World's Foremost Problem. The newspaper articles that comprise The International Jew were written in 1920 or a little later and they shed an interesting light on Jewish activity during and immediately after the war, especially their involvement in the entry of the United States into the war, the subsequent peace conference and the framing of the Balfour declaration.

Canada's Holocaust Museum

A recent BBC story was titled Canada forgets to mention Jewish people at Holocaust memorial and continued:

A plaque has been removed from Canada's Holocaust memorial because it neglected to mention Jewish people. PM Justin Trudeau opened the National Holocaust Monument last week in the capital Ottawa. The plaque commemorated the "millions of men, women and children murdered" but did not specifically mention Jewish people or anti-Semitism. About six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, the largest group to be persecuted by the Nazis.

The problem of course will be rectified but note how the above article reaffirms the figure of six million, although it is prefaced by the word "about". The same BBC article contained a link to a graphic novel version of Anne Frank's diary. Here is an excerpt:

Anne Frank was 15 when she died. She was an aspiring author, and one of more than a million Jewish children killed in the Holocaust. Today her diary - which she nicknamed Kitty - is one of the most-read books in the world. Her teenage prose has spawned Hollywood screenplays, Broadway shows and countless other (re)productions. Now it has been adapted into comic-strip format, in a book produced by the creators of the Oscar-nominated animation Waltz with Bashir, and there is a film coming soon too.

Note how the figure of Jewish children killed is put at "more than one million". This clearly apocryphal story is certainly getting milked for all it's worth. It's a great story, one that puts a face to the faceless masses that perished in WW2, and the fact that it's fiction doesn't matter anymore. Some of the artwork in this graphic novel is reminiscent of the posters from WW1 depicting the threat from the "Hun". For example:

To doubt the declared provenance of the diary is almost as bad as doubting the extent and details of The Holocaust. Anne Frank has become a saint and to question the diary is to question her sainthood. Thus the Holocaust juggernaut, with Anne Frank prominently on board, just keeps rolling on:

The Graphic Diary of Anne Frank is published in the Netherlands and Germany. An English edition will reach audiences in the UK and US early 2018. An animated film is scheduled for release in 2019.

There is seemingly no realistic way of stopping it or even slowing it. If anything, it's gaining momentum.

Propaganda

I just downloaded a book by Edward Bernays titled Propaganda (via this site). Coincidentally, Sigmund Freud married a Martha Bernays as I discovered via a book I'm reading about Freud, titled Freud: the Making of an Illusion by Frederick Crews. Propaganda was recommended by James Corbett in his latest video titled Why Do You Eat Bacon and Eggs. Even though the book was published in 1928, Corbett maintains that it has much to teach us even today. The book begins:

Corbett uses the example of the breakfast staple, bacon and eggs, as something that was thrust upon us by such an "invisible government" during the twentieth century. In terms of food, it continues today with the endless propaganda from the dairy industry and the meat industry where the basic message being conveyed is simple enough: a healthy diet must contain dairy products and meat. Big Pharma and Big Medicine are another potent pairing pushing the line that vaccinations are essential in protecting you from a wide range of disease-causing pathogens.

While the advertising can be slick, propaganda relies strongly on repetition to achieve its insidious psychological effect. Repeat a lie often enough and it will be perceived as the truth. For example, the 9/11 hijackings were carried out by Arabs wielding box cutters. Absurd though this is, the endless repetition of this account of 9/11 over a period of more than sixteen years by MSM has led many to regard this as the truth. Alternative explanations then become fake news. Six million Jews died at the hands of the Nazis in WW2. After seventy years, this propaganda has gained remarkable traction and in Germany at least denying the holocaust can lead to a prison sentence. In many countries, it will cost you your job and most of your friends.

There is a saw that says "saying so, don't make it so" but it would seem that saying so often enough, does indeed make it so in the minds of the many. By "the many", I mean those who rely on the MSM for their information and whose numbers are certainly greater than those who get their information from non-MSM sources. Whether it be potentially lethal vaccinations, the science fiction of 9/11, fake moon landings, the holohoax or whatever, the associated propaganda is relentless, pervasive and starts early. Children at school are indoctrinated directly or indirectly about the benefits of vaccinations, the "true story" of 9/11, the reality of the moon landings and, that basic tenet of Judaism, the Holocaust.

Goodreads lists 609 well-written Holocaust books with The Book Thief by Markus Zusak and The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank ranking first and second respectively. Both of course are required reading in many high school courses. No teacher who valued her or his job would question the official story of the Holocaust, not outloud. No half-way positions are entertained. To be a Holocaust doubter is to be in the same camp as the Holocaust deniers. It is the same way as those who question the medical mafia's decrees on vaccinations and are labelled antivaxxers. The strength of the negative reactions towards those who doubt the efficacy of vaccinations or the reality of the Holocaust show how effective the propaganda has been. Reactions are visceral and immediate. There is no room for discussion. Admittedly, the official account of 9/11 is so absurd that sizeable percentages of the populations of the United States and other countries do not now believe it. The non-believers have various theories as to what they think really happened. There is certainly no unanimity of opinion. In the end, it doesn't matter. As the event recedes into the past, it will be soon become as little considered as the question of who really blew up The Maine in Havana harbour in 1898. Clearly it wasn't the Spanish but who really cares nowadays?

The Jews

It's interesting to read what various people have said about the Jews over the centuries. This site collates such information: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/repute.htm. Clearly, there is a Christian bias here but the statements speak for themselves. Let's begin with that old cigar-chumping bastard, Winston Churchill. In a 1920 article regarding the Russian Revolution, he praised "the national jews" of Russia but then went on to talk about International Jews:

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders . . . In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every bit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.  

"Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People." ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.

Churchill states that Lenin was not a Jew but later accounts claim that he was. On this same website, the following is quoted in this regard:

World famous men of the past accused the Jews of founding Communism. This charge is well founded. The Communist philosophy was drawn up by Karl Marx who descended from a long line of Rabbis. His ideology of anti-Christian and Socialist thought is outlined in the Jewish "TALMUD" which is the "bible" of the Jews. Of the four political groups which overthrew the Christian Czar of Russia two were 100% Jewish. They were the Mensheviks and The Jewish Bund. The other two were the Socialist Revolutionary Party and the Bolsheviks. Both were headed by Jews but had some Gentile members. Today we now know that Lenin was Jewish and all of the leaders of his first government were Jews. They were Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Sverdlow. The wealthiest Jewish banker in the world at that time, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb investment bank of New York City, gave Trotsky and Lenin $20 million to overthrow the Czar and establish the Soviet tyranny. 

"NEW YORK JOURNAL-AMERICAN" of February 3, 1949.

However, I was led to the above-mentioned website because of a quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin in a 1787 speech. It was a prophetic speech that struck me as phoney as soon as I'd read it. The source was from the diary of someone who had been in attendance at the supposed speech. It turns out that this prophecy is very probably a forgery. To quote from Wikipedia:

The Franklin Prophecy is a forgery. It was first published in February 1934 in William Dudley Pelley’s publication, Liberation. It refers to an anti-Semitic speech which Benjamin Franklin is alleged to have made at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, written down by Charles Pinckney of South Carolina and preserved in his journal. In a letter to John Quincy Adams dated 30 December 1818, Pinckney said he had kept a journal of the proceedings at the Convention. Pelley claimed that Pinckney published the Journal "for private distribution among his friends" under the title Chit-Chat Around the Table During Intermissions.

It was circulated during the 1930s however, and the following gives some idea of its impact and of the receptivity to such ideas amongst the general population:

Following its publication in Liberation, the "Prophecy" was widely circulated throughout the United States. In the 1930s it was disseminated by chain letters, and printed copies of the speech were placed in trains, buses, railway stations and similar public places. It appeared in the propaganda press and broadcasts of Nazi Germany and fascist Italy, and a version was included in the 1935 edition of Handbuch der Judenfrage ("Handbook On The Jewish Question"), a political publication by Theodor Fritsch, first written several decades earlier, that went on to become a Nazi "bible". 

In the United States, anti-Semitic groups such as Chicago’s We The Mothers Mobilize For America used the Prophecy as their raison d'etre. Gerald L. K. Smith and other anti-Semitic propagandists argued strongly in favour of its authenticity, and it was printed in Women’s Voice (31 July 1952) and the Political Reporter (July 1953). In May 1954 it was published in The Point, put out by Roman Catholic Father Leonard Feeney of St Benedict’s, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 

If we go back to the Churchill quote however, we see that he wasn't criticising Jews per se. In fact, he had praised the Jews in Russia itself and instead had targeted a sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world.

It's clear that anti-semitism was rampant not only in Europe but also in the United States prior to World War 2. Of course, following Germany's defeat and the hugely successful marketing of The Holocaust, this changed. The stage was set for the creation of the state of Israel and all the subsequent problems arising from that. To my mind, it seems that the history of the Jews in Britain is critical to an understanding of how things have gotten to this current sorry pass. Israel owes its existence to Britain. There is a Wikipedia article on the History of the Jews in England. The article begins as follows:

The history of the Jews in England goes back to the reign of William the Conqueror. The first written record of Jewish settlement in England dates from 1070. The Jewish continued until King Edward I's Edict of Expulsion in 1290. After the expulsion, there was no Jewish community, apart from individuals who practised Judaism secretly, until the rule of Oliver Cromwell. While Cromwell never officially readmitted Jews to Britain, a small colony of Sephardic Jews living in London was identified in 1656 and allowed to remain.

Of course, once the Jews were readmitted, a sinister confederacy quickly gained control of the levers of financial power and never relinquished them. Over the next two centuries, Britain became the world's dominant nation and as its power faded, control of the United States financial system, was gained in 1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve. Jewish control of Hollywood and the entertainment industry followed until total control of the country was achieved in the second half of the twentieth century. In the 1970s, the cabal reached out to China and successively brought it in from the cold to where it had been deliberately banished in 1949. The stage is now set for it to attain dominance over the entire world and not just single, powerful nations. Here are some of the key dates:

• 1066: first Jews arrive with William the Conqueror
• 1290: all Jews expelled from England under decree of Edward 1
• 1655: Jews are readmitted to England thanks to Oliver Cromwell's support
• 1753: Jewish Naturalisation Act passed but repealed the next year due to opposition
• 1798: Rothschilds establish business in Manchester and bank in London
• 1858: Lionel de Rothschild is the first Jew to become a member of parliament
• 1868: Benjamin Disraeli (a Christian Jew) becomes Prime Minister
• 1884: Nathan Mayer Rothschild becomes first Jewish member of House of Lords
• 1917: Walter Rothschild sets up the conditions for the Balfour Declaration, which promises a homeland in Palestine for Jews in a new Zionist State

Interestingly, the Jewish populations in Britain and the United States swelled from the 1880s through the early part of the 20th century because of massive pogroms in Europe: 

Of the East European Jewish emigrants, 1.9 million (80 percent) headed to the United States, and 140,000 (7 percent) to Britain. The chief mechanism was chain migration in which the first successful member(s) of the chain send information, local currency (and sometimes tickets or money for tickets) to later arrivals. Source

However, antisemitism is still alive and well in the world. The following statistics are interesting. Note how Greece, most affected by the banksters, shows the highest rate of antisemitism.