A Match Made In Hell

In attempting to research this topic, I forgot to activate my VPN from within the country that I am resident in. The alert shown in Figure 1 was instantly displayed:

Figure 1: trying to access rumble

Oops! Somebody or a group of somebodies has decided that this is not suitable viewing on the pretext that my privacy is in jeopardy. Fortunately, I have a VPN and I can choose a country that has not yet put rumble on its blacklist. It won't be long before VPNs will be made illegal and anybody who wants to use the Internet will require authorisation via a digital ID. When that time comes, only officially approved websites will be accessible.

This post is about Pfizer's recent acquisition of a cancer research company called Seagen for a whopping $43 billion dollars, despite the latter company recording losses of hundreds of millions of dollars over the last couple of years ($602 million in 2022 and $738 million in 2023). Here is a link to a video on rumble that discusses the acquisition. Here is a link to the Pfizer website in which the acquisition is proudly announced on December 23rd 2023. Here is an excerpt:

“Cancer remains a leading cause of death, and one in three people in the U.S. will receive a cancer diagnosis in their lifetime. With one of the largest investments in Pfizer’s history, we are going all in on cancer with the goal of delivering breakthroughs that drastically improve the lives of people with cancer,” said Dr. Albert Bourla, Pfizer Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. “With Seagen’s proprietary, world-leading Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) technology, together with the scale and strength of Pfizer's capabilities and expertise, we are poised to change the cancer treatment paradigm. We believe Oncology will be a significant growth driver for Pfizer and contribute meaningfully to the achievement of our near- and long-term financial goals.”

So there are profits to be made because cancer is poised to become "a significant growth driver in the near- and long-term". Pfizer needs to recoup its $43 billion investment and seems confident that it will. Does the company know something? Of course it does. The term "turbo cancers" only came into vogue less than a year ago and has of course baffled medical professionals. People in their thirties, forties and fifties are suddenly being diagnosed with advanced and aggressive cancers. People whose cancers were in remission suddenly find that they are reactivated. All these people received their Covid vaccinations and yet this is dismissed as a possible cause.

Perhaps "dismissed" is too strong a word because that would imply the medical establishment had at least entertained the possibility of a link when in fact the possibility was never entered their minds at all. The vast majority of doctors and nurses are programmed to never doubt the efficacy of vaccines. Those that have doubts know to keep it to themselves. A very few will voice their concerns publicly and thus attract the attention of the medical mafia who will do their utmost to end the professional life of their foolhardy brethren.

Pfizer made billions of dollars in vaccine sales from the fake pandemic and it now stands to make billions, perhaps trillions more, from the sale of pharmaceuticals designed to combat the turbo cancers that the vaccines have caused. As the company says "we are going all in on cancer" and the pharmaceuticals that they will be peddling will have all sorts of nasty side effects that may prolong the life of sufferers but make them far more miserable than they might have been without the intervention. In the end, they will die. They will not be cured because the last thing that Pfizer and the medical establishment want is a cure. 

Doubtless, mRNA technology will be involved in the development of these products, and the fear factor will be ramped up to terrify even those who are currently cancer-free to submit to a miracle cancer vaccine to be taken yearly. As this article announces:

The next big advance in cancer treatment could be a vaccine

After decades of limited success, scientists say research has reached a turning point, with many predicting more vaccines will be out in five years.

These aren’t traditional vaccines that prevent disease, but shots to shrink tumors and stop cancer from coming back. Targets for these experimental treatments include breast and lung cancer, with gains reported this year for deadly skin cancer melanoma and pancreatic cancer.

“We’re getting something to work. Now we need to get it to work better,” said Dr. James Gulley, who helps lead a center at the National Cancer Institute that develops immune therapies, including cancer treatment vaccines.

More than ever, scientists understand how cancer hides from the body’s immune system. Cancer vaccines, like other immunotherapies, boost the immune system to find and kill cancer cells. And some new ones use mRNA, which was developed for cancer but first used for COVID-19 vaccines.

It can be noted that there is no attempt to find what might be causing these cancers. The focus is solely on treatment via drugs or vaccines. The twentieth century saw the rise of allopathic, drug-based medicine to the detriment of all other forms of alternative medicine. The massive investment by philanthropists in schools of allopathic medicine ensured this dominance which continues into the current century along with its unholy alliance with the pharmaceutical industry. Indeed a match made in hell. 

I happened to notice that sleazy Russell Brand, card-carrying member of the controlled opposition, is railing on YouTube against the sinister implications of this acquisition of Seagen by Pfizer. Clearly the gatekeepers are not worried about this conspiratorial sort of speculation spreading and confident that their future plans for humanity's cull are on course.

Distorted History

 It struck me recently how little we understand the past. I was reading an article titled The Great Horse Manure Crisis of 1894 and it begins as follows:

By the late 1800s, large cities all around the world were “drowning in horse manure”. In order for these cities to function, they were dependent on thousands of horses for the transport of both people and goods.

In 1900, there were over 11,000 hansom cabs on the streets of London alone. There were also several thousand horse-drawn buses, each needing 12 horses per day, making a staggering total of over 50,000 horses transporting people around the city each day.

To add to this, there were yet more horse-drawn carts and drays delivering goods around what was then the largest city in the world.

This huge number of horses created major problems. The main concern was the large amount of manure left behind on the streets. On average a horse will produce between 15 and 35 pounds of manure per day, so you can imagine the sheer scale of the problem. The manure on London’s streets also attracted huge numbers of flies which then spread typhoid fever and other diseases.

Of course, you never get a sense of that in movies set in that period, probably because the directors are not aware that there was such a problem but even if they were it would be difficult to recreate and would only distract from the plot anyway. There's a tendency to imagine that the not too distant past was not all that different from the present time and differed largely only in respect of certain technological innovations being missing. 

Even more recently, beginning in the 1940s, whole neighborhoods were doused in DDT as this video shows and this article explains. To quote from the article:

Shocking 1940s video shows how US children were sprayed with dangerous pesticide as neighbourhoods were gassed with the 'miracle cure' that could kill mosquitoes and end Polio ... DDT became prevalent in the United States from around 1943 onwards as many viewed it as a miracle cure for polio. An astonishing 1.34 billion tonnes of the chemical was sprayed across the United States in the years between 1946 and 1962. Its impact on the environment was significant, making its way into the food supply and being reported to cause neurological problems in livestock such as cows. While the effects on people are more widely debated, there are still reports of significant health issues being caused as a result of exposure to DDT. The Pesticide Action Network (PAN) of North America states: 'Studies show a range of human health effects linked to DDT and its breakdown product, DDE including, breast and other cancers, male infertility, miscarriages and low birth weight, developmental delay and nervous system and liver damage.' DDT was used well into the 1950s. After a review the U.S. government moved to ban its use in 1972.

I was a child in the 1950s and fortunately, as far as I can remember, DDT wasn't sprayed about in Brisbane Australia but it clearly was in the United States and probably other countries. The irony is that DDT can cause polio-like symptoms as explained in the book The Moth in the Iron Lung: A Biography of Polio. Without proper historical knowledge, an understanding of the rise and fall of the polio epidemic in the 20th century is impossible. The same is true of the Spanish Flu that followed in the aftermath of the Great War.

The narrative being pushed by the media and the medical mafia is that modern medicine has triumphed and continues to triumph over the onslaught of dangerous pathogens. The reality is vastly different of course and the examples of polio and the Spanish flu are a reminder of this.