The Ghost of Anne Frank Stirs

An insane world gets even crazier as

Rome: Italy's soccer authorities, reacting to an anti-Semitic outburst by Lazio fans, ordered stadiums on Tuesday to hold a minute's silence at their next matches while a passage from the diary of Holocaust victim Anne Frank is read out. 

Stickers of Anne Frank wearing the jersey of Lazio's city rivals AS Roma were found on walls and bathrooms in a section of Rome's Olympic Stadium used by Lazio supporters during their Series A match against Cagliari on Sunday.The incident was sharply criticised by Italian politicians and media, with President Sergio Mattarella calling it "inhuman and alarming for our country". 

At the next match in all Italy's soccer divisions, a minute's silence will be held "to condemn the recent episodes of anti-Semitism and to continue to remember the Holocaust," the soccer federation said in a statement. 

Source 

As the article goes on to say, Anne Frank's diary is the "centrepiece of Holocaust literature" and, it might be added, virtually a sacred book. It's provenance can no longer be questioned. Politicians in Germany and Italy of course are very sensitive to perceived outbreaks of anti-semitism and are quick to speak out against them. Not to do so would be politically damaging. The contents of the book on the left can be found at Radio Islam. It's an interesting site with lots of information about the dastardly deeds of the Zionists.

The layout of the site is straight out of the noughties. However, it does have a YouTube channel that seems reasonably up-to-date. Oddly, there are only 594 subscribers. Ditlieb Felderer is an interesting character as the following brief biography indicates:

Felderer, at one time a prominent Jehovah's Witness, is known as an early researcher into the physical evidence in every major concentration camp in then Communist Eastern Europe. Felderer took over 30,000 photographs of every conceivable detail in the camps. He discovered that there was a swimming pool for the inmates in Auschwitz, modern hospital facilities, including a gynecological section, as well as an orchestra, live theatre, well-stocked library, and sculpting classes. He discovered the musical score of the "Auschwitz Waltz" in the secret archives accessible only with special permission. He found that an intimate role was played by Jehovah Witnesses in the camps, who cooperated with the SS-Administration, and he exposed the lie of the 60,000 Jehovah's Witnesses killed. (On his initiative and insistence, the inflated number was reduced to 203) [Trial Transcript Vol. 18, 4226 to 4229; 4645]. For his Revisionist work, Felderer was excommunicated -- that is, drummed out of the Jehovah Witnesses' sect. He has been persecuted by the Holocaust Enforcers ever since. Felderer is known for his weird sense of humour and outlandish, offensive cartoons. He believes that deliberate Holocaust liars and history falsifiers should not have their sensibilities spared. This idiosyncrasy of Felderer is being exploited by Holocaust propagandists in counter-attacks against him. Zündel advisor and witness in the 1985 and 1988 Great Holocaust Trials. Source.

Getting back to the Radio Islam site, there is an interesting page on Jewish control of the Internet. The extent of this influence becomes increasingly clear as the list of Internet power brokers is extensively examined. A list of books can be found on this page.

Canada's Holocaust Museum

A recent BBC story was titled Canada forgets to mention Jewish people at Holocaust memorial and continued:

A plaque has been removed from Canada's Holocaust memorial because it neglected to mention Jewish people. PM Justin Trudeau opened the National Holocaust Monument last week in the capital Ottawa. The plaque commemorated the "millions of men, women and children murdered" but did not specifically mention Jewish people or anti-Semitism. About six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, the largest group to be persecuted by the Nazis.

The problem of course will be rectified but note how the above article reaffirms the figure of six million, although it is prefaced by the word "about". The same BBC article contained a link to a graphic novel version of Anne Frank's diary. Here is an excerpt:

Anne Frank was 15 when she died. She was an aspiring author, and one of more than a million Jewish children killed in the Holocaust. Today her diary - which she nicknamed Kitty - is one of the most-read books in the world. Her teenage prose has spawned Hollywood screenplays, Broadway shows and countless other (re)productions. Now it has been adapted into comic-strip format, in a book produced by the creators of the Oscar-nominated animation Waltz with Bashir, and there is a film coming soon too.

Note how the figure of Jewish children killed is put at "more than one million". This clearly apocryphal story is certainly getting milked for all it's worth. It's a great story, one that puts a face to the faceless masses that perished in WW2, and the fact that it's fiction doesn't matter anymore. Some of the artwork in this graphic novel is reminiscent of the posters from WW1 depicting the threat from the "Hun". For example:

To doubt the declared provenance of the diary is almost as bad as doubting the extent and details of The Holocaust. Anne Frank has become a saint and to question the diary is to question her sainthood. Thus the Holocaust juggernaut, with Anne Frank prominently on board, just keeps rolling on:

The Graphic Diary of Anne Frank is published in the Netherlands and Germany. An English edition will reach audiences in the UK and US early 2018. An animated film is scheduled for release in 2019.

There is seemingly no realistic way of stopping it or even slowing it. If anything, it's gaining momentum.

The Great Game

I started reading Gideon's Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad by Gordon Thomas but gave up on it. I'd become too depressed by the relentless scheming, deception and treachery employed not just by Mossad but by the intelligence agencies in general. High functioning psychopaths are understandably attracted to work as agents. This article from The New Yorker provides a chilling insight into the extent to which undercover British police have gone in their attempts to infiltrate groups that are identified as hostile to the state. The article details how a British cop slept with four women while undercover, having a long term relationship with two of the women and fathering a child with one. Here is an excerpt:

Last year, after several of the women spoke publicly of their experiences, Bob gave a televised interview to Britain’s Channel 4. He admitted to having slept with a total of four women while undercover. He answered questions in a calm, didactic tone. His affectlessness was confounding—it was difficult to tell whether it sprang from remorse and a desire to accept whatever punishment was due or from a profound lack of empathy. 

It was probably "a profound lack of empathy". Bob is a psychopath. The lesson to be drawn from all of this is that the intelligence agencies continue their attempts to infiltrate supposedly dangerous organisations and damage innocent individuals in the process. To quote again from the article:

The emotional compasses of many of the women have been permanently disoriented by the knowledge that they were unwittingly drawn to undercover spies. While the Met commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe has acknowledged that sexual relationships between undercover officers and citizens are inappropriate, the department has fought in court to have the tactic upheld as legal. 

Bob had been trying to infiltrate two sinister organisations: London Greenpeace and the animals rights movement. Nowadays, the primary focus is radical Islamist groups. Salman Abedi, the Manchester bomber, was known to intelligence services "up to a point". He had been reported to authorities five times during the past five years. To quote from The Telegraph:

The Manchester suicide bomber was repeatedly flagged to the authorities over his extremist views, but was not stopped by officers, it emerged Wednesday night. Counter Terrorism agencies were facing questions after it emerged Salman Abedi told friends that “being a suicide bomber was okay”, prompting them to call the Government’s anti-terrorism hotline. Sources suggest that authorities were informed of the danger posed by Abedi on at least five separate occasions in the five years prior to the attack on Monday night.  

Any radical Islamist group planning to launch suicide bomb attacks would most likely NOT have approached Salman Abedi precisely because of his publicly outspoken views. Agents in the intelligence community however, would have been attracted to him instantly. Here was a likely patsy that could be exploited at the appropriate time if the situation warranted it. Is it possible that Salman was approached by an agent years ago who pretended to be a jihadist, in the same way as psychopath Bob pretended to interested in animal liberation. This agent then became his handler and maintained contact with him over the years. Such handlers work alone, as psychopath Bob did, and would report directly to one person only, a superior. That person would in turn be accountable to another superior, high up in the chain of command. Only three people would know Salman had been hooked.

For his part, Salman would believe that his handler was a genuine jihadist with links to Al Qaeda, ISIS or the like. His handler would be sure to keep the flames of jihad burning in Salman so that he would not baulk when asked to make the ultimate sacrifice. So why would his handler turn Salman loose at the Manchester arena after supplying him with his bomb or seeing that he had the expertise to make one? Clearly he was told to do so by a superior who in turn was told to do so by a superior. The orders came from high up but why? Simply put: more chaos, more control.

The current British government has made no secret of its desire to exercise more control over its citizens. It wants encryption that it can crack, it wants an Internet that it can control, it wants to regulate what can be said online and everywhere else. It can only do this through fear. When citizens are fearful, they are more likely to agree to the abrogation of their freedoms. The suicide bomber is the perfect tool to generate this atmosphere of fear. He or she can strike anywhere and anytime. No one is safe unless the Government is given more control over every aspect of daily life. It needs to know what's being said in emails, on mobile phone networks, on chats, at the water cooler. In the interests of a safe society, privacy must be sacrificed and limits imposed on what type of information can be disseminated and received.

"Theresa May has declared without hesitation that she would order a nuclear strike to kill hundreds of thousands of people if she thought it was necessary", Source. It's not likely she would hesitate at the sacrifice of a mere 22 people at the Manchester Arena. To be fair, she might have had no idea that a suicide bombing was being orchestrated. She does not have her hands on the real levers of power. Like most politicians, she is a puppet and her strings are being pulled by her puppet masters whoever they might be. With an election looming and no possibility of a Government defeat however, the timing of the bombing could not have been more opportune.

Meanwhile, there are plenty more radical Islamists out there who are being primed by their handlers in the intelligence community for possible deployment. The problem is not radical Islam. The problem is the support and encouragement given to it by hypocritical Western governments who exploit it for their own ends. Israel's and the United State's demonstrated support for radical Islamic groups in the Middle East aims to break apart countries like Iraq and Syria so that they can pose no danger to Israel. Cultivation of individuals like Salman Abedi allow terror to be unleashed at will on a defenceless public in order to further political agendas like increased powers of surveillance and limitations on free speech.

Individuals like Salman Abedi, described as very gullible by some who knew him, are easily recruited and become valued assets of the intelligence community because they can be unleashed in terror attacks or set up as patsies to bear the blame when attacks of a more professional nature need to be carried out. This is the reason that such individuals are known "up to a point" by security agencies and why repeated warnings about their radicalism go unheeded. After being assigned their handlers, they become off-limits to the broader intelligence community and what is done with them afterwards is known to only a very few people within that community.

Somebody as young as the Manchester bomber could be rehabilitated but once the intelligence community has recruited the person, it is only intent on exploitation. This can only happen if the person's existing attitudes are reinforced and this is what is done over a period of months or years. It will be interesting to see, in Salman Adedi's case, if the alleged network of co-conspirators proves to be a reality. Most likely, Salman would have been encouraged to express his jihadist plans to others so that some might be drawn in and later targeted as belonging to a quasi-network of co-conspirators. Such a scenario seems unbelievable and there's no hard evidence to support it, nor is any likely to emerge. In any country, it is to be hoped that the government agencies charged with protecting the citizenry from terror attacks are serious about doing so. But what if they're not? What if they are following a completely different agenda?

Once the publicly stated agenda is queried, there are two responses: one is to dismiss the possibility of an alternative agenda as outrageous, the second is to concede that such an alternative agenda might exist. Reading a book like "Gideon's Spies" inclines one toward a response of the second type. While hard evidence may be lacking, incidents like the Manchester Arena bombing conform to a pattern characterised by:

• a drill simulating a similar type of attack precedes the real attack or may even occur at the same time (with Manchester, a simulation was carried out a month earlier)
• the suspect being known to the intelligence community but not being deemed a high risk (Salman had been reported five times in five years to the authorities but this failed to raise a red flag)
• a lack of video coverage of the actual event or any video coverage being quickly confiscated (in Manchester, there seems very little in the way of photographs or video of the actual bomb epicentre; the police did release supposed CCTV images but the backgrounds were completely blacked out to allegedly protect the identities of people in his vicinity)
• odd coincidences (Drake performing "Gyalchester" the night before the attack at the Music Billboard Awards)
• prominence of certain numbers (the attack took place at 22:35 on the 22nd of May and the attacker was 22 years old): 11 and multiples of 11 are popular)

The more such terror events are studied, the more one accepts that intelligence agencies have a hidden agenda that overrides the publicly stated one and that this agenda is not necessarily shared with the politicians who are in power at the time. 

Propaganda

I just downloaded a book by Edward Bernays titled Propaganda (via this site). Coincidentally, Sigmund Freud married a Martha Bernays as I discovered via a book I'm reading about Freud, titled Freud: the Making of an Illusion by Frederick Crews. Propaganda was recommended by James Corbett in his latest video titled Why Do You Eat Bacon and Eggs. Even though the book was published in 1928, Corbett maintains that it has much to teach us even today. The book begins:

Corbett uses the example of the breakfast staple, bacon and eggs, as something that was thrust upon us by such an "invisible government" during the twentieth century. In terms of food, it continues today with the endless propaganda from the dairy industry and the meat industry where the basic message being conveyed is simple enough: a healthy diet must contain dairy products and meat. Big Pharma and Big Medicine are another potent pairing pushing the line that vaccinations are essential in protecting you from a wide range of disease-causing pathogens.

While the advertising can be slick, propaganda relies strongly on repetition to achieve its insidious psychological effect. Repeat a lie often enough and it will be perceived as the truth. For example, the 9/11 hijackings were carried out by Arabs wielding box cutters. Absurd though this is, the endless repetition of this account of 9/11 over a period of more than sixteen years by MSM has led many to regard this as the truth. Alternative explanations then become fake news. Six million Jews died at the hands of the Nazis in WW2. After seventy years, this propaganda has gained remarkable traction and in Germany at least denying the holocaust can lead to a prison sentence. In many countries, it will cost you your job and most of your friends.

There is a saw that says "saying so, don't make it so" but it would seem that saying so often enough, does indeed make it so in the minds of the many. By "the many", I mean those who rely on the MSM for their information and whose numbers are certainly greater than those who get their information from non-MSM sources. Whether it be potentially lethal vaccinations, the science fiction of 9/11, fake moon landings, the holohoax or whatever, the associated propaganda is relentless, pervasive and starts early. Children at school are indoctrinated directly or indirectly about the benefits of vaccinations, the "true story" of 9/11, the reality of the moon landings and, that basic tenet of Judaism, the Holocaust.

Goodreads lists 609 well-written Holocaust books with The Book Thief by Markus Zusak and The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank ranking first and second respectively. Both of course are required reading in many high school courses. No teacher who valued her or his job would question the official story of the Holocaust, not outloud. No half-way positions are entertained. To be a Holocaust doubter is to be in the same camp as the Holocaust deniers. It is the same way as those who question the medical mafia's decrees on vaccinations and are labelled antivaxxers. The strength of the negative reactions towards those who doubt the efficacy of vaccinations or the reality of the Holocaust show how effective the propaganda has been. Reactions are visceral and immediate. There is no room for discussion. Admittedly, the official account of 9/11 is so absurd that sizeable percentages of the populations of the United States and other countries do not now believe it. The non-believers have various theories as to what they think really happened. There is certainly no unanimity of opinion. In the end, it doesn't matter. As the event recedes into the past, it will be soon become as little considered as the question of who really blew up The Maine in Havana harbour in 1898. Clearly it wasn't the Spanish but who really cares nowadays?

Another Patsy

One definition of patsy is "fall guy, victim of a deception" link. The Las Vegas lone gunman may have been a patsy rather than a crazed mass murderer. Of course, we'll never know for sure because he's dead, having reportedly killed himself because his hotel suite was stormed. The officially sanctioned crazed lone gunman story will continue to be repeated by the MSM and all attempts to challenge that story will come to nought. Any overly inquisitive law enforcement agents, whether police or FBI, will be discouraged from pursuing any leads that might contradict this official story. Most are savvy enough by now to know that it will not further their careers to raise any objections.

Any eye witnesses whose accounts differ from the official story will find that there is no follow up by law enforcement personnel. Any contradictory photographic or video evidence will soon disappear. Any member of the public perceived as a serious threat to the official story will be eliminated. Most citizens are savvy enough to know that there is nothing to be gained by going public with their testimony or evidence and that there is everything to lose. The official story, shaped within hours of the incident, will not be challenged.

What of the gunman? It's known he was a gambler and gamblers who lose are vulnerable to suggestions that will eliminate their debts. What if he were approached by those to whom he owed money and offered a way out of his predicament? All he need do was to go along with a plan of some sort or another. As proof of their goodwill, he was given money to buy his girlfriend a ticket to the Phillipines and $100,000 to deposit into her bank account. Whatever he was told was going to happen, he wouldn't have been told that it involved the murder and maiming of hundreds of concert-goers. His girlfriend and his brother were mystified by his actions. It was quite out-of-character. Why he was targeted as the patsy of choice is difficult to say. He seems not to have had a wide circle of friends so that it was unlikely that he would have let anything slip beforehand. He may have only been told what he needed to do after his girlfriend had left for the Philippines.

His gambling background may have added to his appeal and helped make his stay at the casino hotel more plausible. Here was an average Joe who liked to gamble and who, unbeknown to anybody, harboured a desire for mass murder. Clearly, scanning procedures need to be implemented in all hotels across the nation to prevent a repeat of this horrific massacre. One or more companies will need to supply the necessary scanners and so the question qui bono needs to be asked. Who benefits? The companies supplying the scanners will benefit directly to the tune of billions of dollars in profits. The Federal Government will benefit indirectly because it is just a further step toward an Orwellian State where all movement is monitored.

Of course, being the United States, the issue of gun laws becomes highlighted once again. Hillary Clinton's tweet about the massacre mentioned the need to challenge the gun lobby yet again. This of course makes the gun lobby nervous as they fear their precious weapons will be taken away from them, leaving them at the mercy of an increasingly militarised police force. Their concerns are reasonable because, in the United States certainly, the purpose of police forces is to implement the dictates of the Government and certainly not to safeguard the rights of citizens. After 9/11, the powers-that-ought-not-to-be realised that they could get away with mass murder no matter how suspicious the official story might turn out to be and this time as well they will get away with it again.

It only just came to my attention that the shooting took place directly in front of the pyramid and sphinx of the Luxor hotel shown in the above photo. The music festival site was clearly chosen for that reason. 

From Wikipedia: "Ground was broken for the Luxor in March 1992 and the resort officially opened at 4 AM on October 13, 1993, to a crowd of 10,000 people." The article goes on to say that:

At 42.3 billion candela, the Luxor Sky Beam is the strongest beam of light in the world, using computer-designed, curved mirrors to collect the light from 39 xenon lamps and focus them into one intense, narrow beam. On a clear night, the Sky Beam is visible up to 275 miles (443 km) away by aircraft at cruising altitude, such as over Los Angeles.

Apparently, "Luxor was the ancient city of Thebes, the great capital of (Upper) Egypt during the New Kingdom, and the glorious city of Amun, later to become the god Amun-Ra." Source. This recent video that I watched gives a very good account of the ten signs to look for as evidence of a false flag attack (doubtless YouTube will remove the video at some future date, so the embed may not always work).

1. saturation, repetitive but superficial MSM coverage of events
2. pre-packaged account of events delivered by MSM to exclusion of any alternatives
3. suspects are killed or suicided
4. skill levels of suspects are not commensurate with events carried out
5. similar or identical drills are carried out simultaneously with the real events
6. people in high places are forewarned of the events
7. accused have ties to governmental organisations
8. mysterious witness deaths in the aftermath of the events
9. mysterious disappearance of evidence
10. qui bono? who benefits?

In conclusion, it's relevant to note James Corbett's contribution to the Las Vegas issue. He said that every time people get caught up in discussion over this or that terrorist incident they are dancing to a tune set by the ruling elite. This elite know that whatever the official story is, it will be believed by the majority of the population because it will be reinforced continuously by MSM. The more "conspiracy theories" the better. Agents of the ruling elite will inject their own theories into the mix, adding to the confusion. What's important is that the event gets noticed and that the essential message is conveyed, namely that it's not safe out there and that governments need to increase surveillance and policing of their populations. A few days later, interest wanes and people get back to normal: sport, movies, television, music etc. Before too long, there's another "incident".

It's worth including here the 4chan posts of early September that seem to presage an attack on Las Vegas:

The Jews

It's interesting to read what various people have said about the Jews over the centuries. This site collates such information: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/repute.htm. Clearly, there is a Christian bias here but the statements speak for themselves. Let's begin with that old cigar-chumping bastard, Winston Churchill. In a 1920 article regarding the Russian Revolution, he praised "the national jews" of Russia but then went on to talk about International Jews:

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders . . . In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every bit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.  

"Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People." ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.

Churchill states that Lenin was not a Jew but later accounts claim that he was. On this same website, the following is quoted in this regard:

World famous men of the past accused the Jews of founding Communism. This charge is well founded. The Communist philosophy was drawn up by Karl Marx who descended from a long line of Rabbis. His ideology of anti-Christian and Socialist thought is outlined in the Jewish "TALMUD" which is the "bible" of the Jews. Of the four political groups which overthrew the Christian Czar of Russia two were 100% Jewish. They were the Mensheviks and The Jewish Bund. The other two were the Socialist Revolutionary Party and the Bolsheviks. Both were headed by Jews but had some Gentile members. Today we now know that Lenin was Jewish and all of the leaders of his first government were Jews. They were Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Sverdlow. The wealthiest Jewish banker in the world at that time, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb investment bank of New York City, gave Trotsky and Lenin $20 million to overthrow the Czar and establish the Soviet tyranny. 

"NEW YORK JOURNAL-AMERICAN" of February 3, 1949.

However, I was led to the above-mentioned website because of a quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin in a 1787 speech. It was a prophetic speech that struck me as phoney as soon as I'd read it. The source was from the diary of someone who had been in attendance at the supposed speech. It turns out that this prophecy is very probably a forgery. To quote from Wikipedia:

The Franklin Prophecy is a forgery. It was first published in February 1934 in William Dudley Pelley’s publication, Liberation. It refers to an anti-Semitic speech which Benjamin Franklin is alleged to have made at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, written down by Charles Pinckney of South Carolina and preserved in his journal. In a letter to John Quincy Adams dated 30 December 1818, Pinckney said he had kept a journal of the proceedings at the Convention. Pelley claimed that Pinckney published the Journal "for private distribution among his friends" under the title Chit-Chat Around the Table During Intermissions.

It was circulated during the 1930s however, and the following gives some idea of its impact and of the receptivity to such ideas amongst the general population:

Following its publication in Liberation, the "Prophecy" was widely circulated throughout the United States. In the 1930s it was disseminated by chain letters, and printed copies of the speech were placed in trains, buses, railway stations and similar public places. It appeared in the propaganda press and broadcasts of Nazi Germany and fascist Italy, and a version was included in the 1935 edition of Handbuch der Judenfrage ("Handbook On The Jewish Question"), a political publication by Theodor Fritsch, first written several decades earlier, that went on to become a Nazi "bible". 

In the United States, anti-Semitic groups such as Chicago’s We The Mothers Mobilize For America used the Prophecy as their raison d'etre. Gerald L. K. Smith and other anti-Semitic propagandists argued strongly in favour of its authenticity, and it was printed in Women’s Voice (31 July 1952) and the Political Reporter (July 1953). In May 1954 it was published in The Point, put out by Roman Catholic Father Leonard Feeney of St Benedict’s, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 

If we go back to the Churchill quote however, we see that he wasn't criticising Jews per se. In fact, he had praised the Jews in Russia itself and instead had targeted a sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world.

It's clear that anti-semitism was rampant not only in Europe but also in the United States prior to World War 2. Of course, following Germany's defeat and the hugely successful marketing of The Holocaust, this changed. The stage was set for the creation of the state of Israel and all the subsequent problems arising from that. To my mind, it seems that the history of the Jews in Britain is critical to an understanding of how things have gotten to this current sorry pass. Israel owes its existence to Britain. There is a Wikipedia article on the History of the Jews in England. The article begins as follows:

The history of the Jews in England goes back to the reign of William the Conqueror. The first written record of Jewish settlement in England dates from 1070. The Jewish continued until King Edward I's Edict of Expulsion in 1290. After the expulsion, there was no Jewish community, apart from individuals who practised Judaism secretly, until the rule of Oliver Cromwell. While Cromwell never officially readmitted Jews to Britain, a small colony of Sephardic Jews living in London was identified in 1656 and allowed to remain.

Of course, once the Jews were readmitted, a sinister confederacy quickly gained control of the levers of financial power and never relinquished them. Over the next two centuries, Britain became the world's dominant nation and as its power faded, control of the United States financial system, was gained in 1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve. Jewish control of Hollywood and the entertainment industry followed until total control of the country was achieved in the second half of the twentieth century. In the 1970s, the cabal reached out to China and successively brought it in from the cold to where it had been deliberately banished in 1949. The stage is now set for it to attain dominance over the entire world and not just single, powerful nations. Here are some of the key dates:

• 1066: first Jews arrive with William the Conqueror
• 1290: all Jews expelled from England under decree of Edward 1
• 1655: Jews are readmitted to England thanks to Oliver Cromwell's support
• 1753: Jewish Naturalisation Act passed but repealed the next year due to opposition
• 1798: Rothschilds establish business in Manchester and bank in London
• 1858: Lionel de Rothschild is the first Jew to become a member of parliament
• 1868: Benjamin Disraeli (a Christian Jew) becomes Prime Minister
• 1884: Nathan Mayer Rothschild becomes first Jewish member of House of Lords
• 1917: Walter Rothschild sets up the conditions for the Balfour Declaration, which promises a homeland in Palestine for Jews in a new Zionist State

Interestingly, the Jewish populations in Britain and the United States swelled from the 1880s through the early part of the 20th century because of massive pogroms in Europe: 

Of the East European Jewish emigrants, 1.9 million (80 percent) headed to the United States, and 140,000 (7 percent) to Britain. The chief mechanism was chain migration in which the first successful member(s) of the chain send information, local currency (and sometimes tickets or money for tickets) to later arrivals. Source

However, antisemitism is still alive and well in the world. The following statistics are interesting. Note how Greece, most affected by the banksters, shows the highest rate of antisemitism.