Moviedom

For me, movies are becoming increasingly unwatchable. Take for instance, my latest attempt that involved "Knock at the Cabin" with screenplay by M. Night Shyamalan and starring Dave Bautista among others. It involved a family consisting of two fathers and an eight year old girl of Chinese ethnicity. This frontal assault on the family by the movie industry is nowadays relentless and gathering momentum. The intent is to redefine the family so that children being raised by two fathers or two mothers is just as acceptable as being raised by the traditional father and mother. 

At the point where the happy parents were picking their baby up from the hospital, I turned the movie off. There's obviously a quota now that movie studios have to adhere to and this involves showing a certain percentage of families in movies as comprising same sex couples. I don't know what the percentage is but it seems sizable. 

Episode 3 of "The Last of Us" featured an entire episode depicting the relationship between two gay guys from start to finish over the course of many years. It bore no relationship to the plot of the story that effectively was put on hold at the end of episode 2 and restarted with episode 4. It was as if the producers used that entire episode to fulfill their quota so that they get on with the story.

While one wonders who really wants to see two bearded men kissing, the real issue is that this plot element was clearly injected into the story line to fulfill a quota. The quota is not only about the makeup of families and the sexual orientation of individuals, it involves the depiction of minorities. In the case of North America, this means a certain percentage of actors need to be black, Asian, Hispanic etc. The recent backlash against the BAFTA winners being almost exclusively white shows that the pressure is on to make awards conform to this quota system as well.

Film makers are under pressure to meet these standards or face the financial consequences. It's similar to the pressure being applied to businesses to adhere to ESG standards. It's all to do with a very small minority of people with inordinate influence deciding what is best for the vast majority of humanity. The sad fact is that this majority is easily lead. I remember watching Sunday Bloody Sunday in the cinema fifty years and the audience groaning in unison at the sight of Peter Finch kissing his male lover.

Most people have little idea of the battle that was fought between Hollywood and the Catholic Church regarding sexual content in movies. It's no secret that Jews run Hollywood, although it's really only acceptable to say so this if you're a Jew. It's also no secret that the Jews pioneered the porn industry. From the early days of Hollywood, the movie moguls were keen to add prurient content to their movies but the Catholic bishops, especially in cities like Boston, threatened a boycott and the moguls caved in. More details of this struggle can be read in "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit" by E. Michael Jones.

This restraint that had been forced upon Hollywood fell apart in the mid-sixties as Catholicism imploded. Excessive violence and disagreeable sexual content increasingly found its way into movies in the late sixties and early seventies. The rot has continued ever since but it's clearly now rotten to the core. You could watch nearly every movie before the mid-sixties with your family and not have them exposed to anything uncomfortable or extreme. That changed as the sixties unfolded.

The main point of this post is that good movies are not made by being forced to adhere to quotas regarding sexual orientation, ethnicity or whatever is deemed necessary by the movie mafia. Film makers should feel free to work with an all white cast of heterosexuals if it suits their purposes and awards should be decided on their merits and not whether they successfully fulfill woke quotas.

Rinse and Repeat

A tweet caught my attention this morning. Figure 1 shows a screenshot.

Figure 1

It's an interesting question to which everyone will have their own opinion but I suspect the percentage very high. I'm not proud of my own history in this regard. I remember watching "An Inconvenient Truth", a documentary released on May 24th 2006, and being suitably impressed. I can only cringe now at my naivete. 

I was still working full time back then and work did consume a lot of my time. I was also drinking and partying after work and generally enjoying life. It was only when I retired that I had unlimited time to delve deeply into what IS going on. Even then, navigating the alt-media had its own hazards. The controlled opposition is everywhere and is cultivated to capture those who know SOMETHING is going on but are not quite sure what.

For those who eschew MSM, the controlled opposition is there to capture and contain that demographic whose members will be fed just enough information to keep them outraged. The emotion however, will never spill out onto the streets or result in political initiatives but will be expended instead within the group of subscribers associated with a particular alt-media hero. The group acts effectively as an echo chamber and nothing of any substance arises that might effect real world outcomes. 

All the lies, deceit and propaganda promulgated by the MSM is best caricatured by visual images. These carry more weight than words which seems to have degenerated into doublespeak. Figure 2 is a good example of what I mean. The picture captures the constant distractions that are put in our way to obscure the deeper agenda that the Khazarian Mafia are pursuing.

Figure 2

Who are the Khazarian Mafia? Well Solzhenitsyn does a good job of saying who they are without saying who they are. See Figure 3.

Figure 3

"The global media is in the hands of the perpetrators" indeed as "the world (remains) ignorant about this enormous crime". The crimes and the criminality continue to the present day and "the greatest human slaughter of all time" may be a work in progress rather than an historical event.

C40 Cities

As national boundaries break down and city states become more dominant, this is what the mayors of certain cities have planned for you by 2030, if they get their way. 

C40 is a network of mayors of nearly 100 world-leading cities collaborating to deliver the urgent action needed right now to confront the climate crisis. Together, we can create a future where everyone, everywhere can thrive.

Let's start with air travel. See Figure 1.

Figure 1: source

Let that sink in. The progressive target is one short-haul return flight of less than 1500 kilometers every two years per person or every three years if the ambitious target is reached. For Australians living in Sydney and Melbourne and whose mayors have seemingly signed up for this, it means you don't get to leave Australia. Even New Zealand is out of reach because the distance from Sydney to Auckland is 2,155 kilometers.

Let's look at meat and dairy consumption targets. See Figure 2.

Figure 2: source

Take the progressive target of 90 kg of dairy. A litre of milk weighs a little over one kilogram so that translates to about one litre of milk every four days. The average supermarket sausage weight about 50 grams. The progressive target of 16 kg of meat means 320 sausages per year or less than one per day. Let that sink in. 

The targets for clothing are shown in Figure 3 and automobiles in Figure 4.

Figure 3: source

Figure 4: source

In Australia in 2022, the rate of vehicle ownership was 782 per thousand people. So the progressive target represents about a 75% reduction in vehicle ownership. As for the clothing targets, words fail me.

It's easy to dismiss these targets as unrealistic and unattainable but with the introduction of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) various "disincentives" and even outright prohibitions can be applied to our purchases so that we are forced to conform to these targets. One thing that can be done is to vote against the mayor of any city who has signed up to these C40 targets and make as many people as possible aware of what their mayor has done.

Our politicians and elected officials need to get a clear message that if they support ridiculous initiatives such as those proposed by the C40CITIES then they will be voted out of office.