ANIARA

It was only when watching 2017's " Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri" that I realised how anti-Catholic Hollywood had become. The Jewish-controlled media is saturated with concerns about anti-Semitism but there is nary a mention made of instances of anti-Catholicism. In the movie just mentioned, a Catholic priest comes to visit the character played by Frances McDormand and she launches into a foul-mouthed tirade. It is described in Catholic News Service as follows:

Earlier in the proceedings, a priest visits Mildred (a recently lapsed Catholic) to remonstrate with her about the strife her billboards are causing. In response, she launches into a tirade in which she compares Catholic clergymen to the members of violent street gangs and applies the principle of collective guilt to claim that even good priests are complicit in their evil peers' crimes against children. 

This cruel and unreasonable denunciation will rightly outrage the sensibilities of Catholic moviegoers. Add to it the picture's ill-advised treatment of suicide and a climactic sequence that toys with justifying murderous revenge -- though the outcome is left unclear -- and the verdict on this aesthetically accomplished piece of cinema must be that it is spiritually unfit for all. 

The film contains anti-Catholicism, a skewed view of suicide, an ambivalent treatment of vigilantism, some violence with brief gore, numerous profanities and at least one milder oath as well as pervasive rough and frequent crude language. The Catholic News Service classification is O, morally offensive. The Motion Picture Association of America rating is R, restricted with under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.

Mildred's outburst is clearly inserted for shock value as it does not add to the storyline. The relationship between Hollywood and the Catholic Church goes back a long way, as I discovered when reading E. Michael Jones' book "The Jewish Revolutionary Influence and its Impact on World History". To quote from page 776 of that book:

The outcry against Hollywood's subversion of morals was so great that federal, state and local legislation was proposed as an antidote. To head off legislation, Hollywood's Jews in 1934 entered into a voluntary agreement, the Production Code, with the Legion of Decency, a Catholic operation. The Catholics had forced the issue by organising boycotts when the film industry was reeling. 

Henry Ford admired Catholic resistance to Jewish Hollywood, even before imposition of the Code. Unlike Protestant clergymen who were regularly ridiculed in Hollywood films, "The Catholic clergy very soon made themselves felt in opposition to this abuse of their priestly dignity, and as a result of their vigorous resentment the Jew climbed down. You now never see a priest made light of on the screen. But the Protestant clergyman is still the elongated, snivelling, bilious hypocrite of anti-Christian caricatures."

How things have changed. The Production Code terminated in 1965. Joe Breen, who oversaw the Production Code for 20 years had this to say about the Hollywood elite (again I'm quoting from page 776 of the book):

They are simply a rotten bunch of vile people with no respect for anything beyond the making of money.... Here [in Hollywood] we have Paganism rampant and in its most virulent form. Drunkenness and debauchery are commonplace. Sexual perversion is rampant,'" any number of our directors and stars are perverts.... These Jews seem to think of nothing but moneymaking and sexual indulgence. The vilest kind of sin is a common indulgence hereabouts and the men and women who engage in this sort of business are the men and women who decide what the film fare of the nation is to be. They and they alone make the decision. Ninety-five percent of these folks are Jews of an Eastern European lineage. They are, probably, the scum of the earth.

Strong words and probably more true today than it was then but, oddly enough considering today's sensitivities, the Hollywood barons of the time didn't regard Joe Breen as an anti-Semite:

Joe Breen, who had railed against the immorality of the Hollywood Jews, had learned from them, and they from him. They would not have asked him to run RKO Pictures if he had been truly anti-Semitic. They would not have flown him here and there. They would not have invited him into their homes. And they certainly would not have given him an Academy Award. He had convictions. He was a fighter, but he didn't hate.

This of course is the point. One can criticise Jewish control of Hollywood or the media or American foreign policy without hating Jews. Of course, organisations like the Anti Defamation League or ADL view any explicit mention of Jewish control or any criticism of Jews or Israel as anti-Semiticism. Imagine the outcry if Mildred launched into a similar tirade against Rabbinical Judaism. Frances McDormand, who comes from a Protestant background, is married to Joel Coen (one half of the famous Coen brothers). 

Lately I've grown increasingly disillusioned with Hollywood movies, Netflix series and the like and so last night I chose to watch a Swedish science fiction movie, Aniara. However, it was more of the same Hollywood crap. To quote from a Rotten Tomatoes review:

ANIARA is the story of one of the many spaceships used for transporting Earth's fleeing population to their new home-planet Mars. But just as the ship leaves the destroyed Earth, she collides with space junk and is thrown off her course. The passengers slowly realize that they'll never be able to return. The protagonist, MR, runs a room where a sentient computer allows humans to experience near-spiritual memories of the Earth. As the ship drifts further into the endless void more and more passengers are in need of MRs services. Pressure builds on MR as she is the only one who can keep the growing insanity and lethal depression at bay. In Aniara's inexorable journey towards destruction there is a warning that cannot be emphasised enough. There's only one Earth. It's time to take responsibility for our actions.

In short, more propaganda to support the Global Warming Alarmists who believe that humanity is headed for disaster because of uncontrolled carbon dioxide emissions. The protagonist also gets involved in a lesbian relationship and her lover becomes pregnant after a group sex orgy. Together they raise the resulting infant although it doesn't end well. Again more propaganda, this time in support of the LBGT agenda that disparages the cliché of a mother and a father as being so yesterday and proposes that mother and mother or father and father are equally viable options. It seems that Hollywood has infected the entire world.

The Star Kicker Logo

I was watching a YouTube video of Dire Straits performing "Sultans of Swing" in 1978 on a BBC show called "The Old Grey Whistle Test". According to Wikipedia:

The Old Grey Whistle Test (usually abbreviated to Whistle Test or OGWT) was a British television music show. It was commissioned by David Attenborough and aired on BBC2 from 1971 to 1988. It took over the BBC2 late night slot from Disco 2, which ran between September 1970 and July 1971, while continuing to feature non-chart music. The show was devised by BBC producer Rowan Ayers. The original producer, involved in an executive capacity throughout the show's entire history, was Michael Appleton. According to presenter Bob Harris, the programme derived its name from a Tin Pan Alley phrase from years before. When they got the first pressing of a record they would play it to people they called the old greys – doormen in grey suits. Any song they could remember and whistle, having heard it just once or twice, had passed the old grey whistle test.

As the group was performing, I noticed an illuminated picture in the background that I've since discovered is the so-called Star kicker Logo. Again to quote from Wikipedia:

The original opening credits were played over a naked woman, painted in green, dancing to Santana's Jingo. When Richard Williams was replaced by 'Whispering' Bob Harris, the series' opening titles theme was changed to the now more famous animation of a male figure made up of stars (known as the 'Star Kicker') dancing. The programme's title music, with its harmonica theme, was a track called "Stone Fox Chase" by a Nashville band, Area Code 615. 

Figure 1 shows a T-shirt with the logo:

Figure 1

To me it looks like someone kicking a cross rather than a star, making it distinctly anti-Christian in character. However, searches thus far haven't revealed anybody making that accusation. There is this BBC article from the 5th of September 2010 titled "Cardinal: BBC biased against Christianity" and to quote:

The leader of the Roman Catholic Church in Scotland has accused the BBC of "institutional bias" against Christianity. Cardinal Keith O'Brien said that mainstream Christian views had been marginalised by the corporation. He also said a forthcoming BBC documentary about the Pope's visit, would be a "hatchet job". A spokeswoman for the BBC said the corporation refuted the allegations "absolutely". In an interview with the Sunday Times, Cardinal O'Brien said: "(Our) detailed research into BBC news coverage of Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular, together with a systematic analysis of output by the Catholic Church, has revealed a consistent anti-Christian institutional bias. "This week the BBC's director-general admitted that the corporation had displayed massive bias in its political coverage throughout the 1980s, acknowledging the existence of an institutional political bias." The cardinal said that senior news managers had admitted to the Catholic Church that a "radically secular mindset and socially liberal mindset" pervaded newsrooms. He added: "This is utterly at odds with wider public attitudes and sadly taints BBC news and current affairs coverage of religious issues, particularly matters of Christian belief." The cardinal also voiced concern that a forthcoming BBC documentary titled Benedict - Trials of a Pope will be a "hatchet job" on the Vatican. It covers Catholic abuse scandals and will be shown on 15 September, the eve of Pope Benedict XVI's visit to Scotland. In response, a spokeswoman for the BBC said: "The BBC's news and current affairs coverage of any subject is approached in an objective and impartial way reflecting the different sides of the debate. "BBC news and current affairs has a dedicated religion correspondent, and works closely with BBC Religion, ensuring topical religious and ethical affairs stories are featured across all BBC networks."

Given the Jewish influence over mass media, I think the Cardinal's accusations are definitely justified. Whether there was deliberate intent to "put the boot" into Christianity by the introduction of this logo in the early 70's is hard to gauge now. I must confess that at first I thought Mark Knopfler had chosen the background and I was naturally suspicious because to quote from Wikipedia yet again:

Mark Freuder Knopfler was born on 12 August 1949 in Glasgow, Scotland, to an English mother, Louisa Mary (née Laidler), and a Hungarian father, Erwin Knopfler. His mother was a teacher and his father was an architect and a chess player whose anti-fascist sympathies and Jewish parentage forced him to flee from his native Hungary in 1939. Knopfler later described his father as a Marxist agnostic.

The Marxist oriented Jews are notoriously anti-Christian and I thought the father might have passed this on to the son. Of course, I now know this wasn't the case but the suspicion set me off on an investigation of what the logo meant. I'm primed for suspicion at the moment because I'm reaching page 1000 of E. Michael Jones's "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit". The section of the book that I'm currently reading is dealing with the 1960's and the effect this spirit had on that decade. Figure 2 shows the book cover.

Figure 2

A musical program like "The Old Grey Whistle Test" provided a wonderful opportunity to erode youthful morals by suggesting it's time to kick away old religious baggage. Decades later, the attack on morality via mainstream music and musical performances has intensified nauseating proportions. Figure 3 shows Kesha performing with an inverted cross with commentary from this source:

Sadly inverted crosses are becoming commonplace in popular culture, often also associated with darkness in other ways. Where once they may have been used for shock value and rebellion, they are now becoming a new norm in fashion accessories as society moves further and further away from an understanding of spiritual values.

Figure 3

So the Star Kicker logo perhaps represents an early attack on Christian morals and values. An attack that has only gathered momentum over the following decades.

Einstein: Right Again!

Every time I see another headline about Einstein being right again, I want to scream. This news update from New Scientist was the latest. Notice that it's not "Relativity proved right again". The emphasis is always on the main, Einstein, and not the Theory of Relativity that is associated with him. Scientific publications like New Scientist will trumpet it first and then mainstream media outlets will join in the apotheosis that has been in full swing for almost one hundred years now.

In the early part of the twentieth century, Relativity (both Special and General) was certainly coming whether Einstein was there or not. Other mathematicians and scientists had laid the groundwork: Riemann, Hilbert, Lorenz, Poincaré and others. However, Einstein was first to publish and so deserves the credit according to the general consensus. Not all agree of course and controversy has dogged Einstein for the past century. How did this obscure patent clerk rise so suddenly from anonymity to worldwide acclaim? Christopher Jon Bjerknes in his book THE MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF SAINT EINSTEIN is scathing in his attack on Einstein as a fraud and a product of Jewish propaganda. I did start ready this book but its over 2500 pages and is badly written.

I should try to read this book again but Bjerkness is not the only one to accuse Einstein of plagiarism. There are plenty of others but I don't want to go into that in this post. I'll accept for now that Einstein did publish first and deserves major credit for the theory. What irks me is that nobody else ever seems to get any credit as the focus is always on the man. The name Einstein has been burnt into the brains of most of humanity so that phrases like "I'm no Einstein but ... " have come to permeate the language, the English language at least. An industry has sprung up around his name and his image. A century of perception management has created a towering, God-like figure who may well have feet of clay. Einstein seems to 99% hype and perhaps 1% substance.

The same propaganda has been applied to Freud, the so-called Father of Psychoanalysis. However, Frederick Crews in his book "Freud: the Making of an Illusion" does a good job of exposing the hype surrounding him. In the twentieth century, the Jewish control of mainstream media purposefully and effectively set out to portray Einstein and Freud as intellectual Jewish giants for whom, although this was only implied, there was no equivalent amongst the Gentiles. Of course compared to Carl Jung, Sigmund Freud looks lilliputian in the eyes of many and indeed the latter's stature has diminished over the years while the former's has grown. Einstein still remains on his pedestal for now. Many would claim that the bust of Nikola Tesla deserves to be mounted on that pedestal but that's another story.

The takeaway here is that, as always, nothing is what it seems. The question to be asked is: Does Albert Einstein deserve the accolade of Greatest Scientist of the Twentieth Century? How much is he a product of mainstream media hype? There are no ready answers to either question but merely by asking these questions a beginning has been made in doubting what we take for granted about the world and its history.

The Elephant in the Room Part 2

Click here for Part 1

Here is the heading and part of an article from the Courier Mail of September 13th 2019 that I read today:

Rapid rise in food allergy

Parliament inquiry into deadly anaphylaxis

Deadly anaphylaxis rates from food have doubled in 10 years while hospital admissions have increased five-fold over the past 20 years. Allergy and anaphylaxis will be examined in a parliamentary enquiry with over four million Australians living with the life-threatening health condition. The reason for the rapid rise in allergies in Australia, which has one the highest rates in the world, is unknown ... Allergy and Anaphylaxis Australia figures show that one in 10 infants now have a food allergy.

The elephant in the room comes to mind when anticipating the direction this parliamentary enquiry will take. Any suggestion that the aggressive marketing of vaccines over the past 20 years may have contributed to this epidemic of allergies and anaphylactic reactions will be steadfastly ignored. As Figure 1 reveals, silence as to the role of vaccines will be maintained throughout the enquiry, a variety of diversions will be explored, ignorance will be feigned regarding the damage vaccines cause and denial invoked if any such damage is mentioned. The reluctance to avoid any offence to pharmaceutical and medical interests will ensure avoidance of any mention of the real culprit behind what is clearly a scandal of epic proportions.

Figure 1

I might be wrong but I doubt it. I've posted frequently on the damage caused by vaccines so I'm not going to go into any of that here. An example of the blatant desire to even consider vaccines as a possibility is shown in this 2018 article titled WHY IS AUSTRALIA THE FOOD ALLERGY CAPITAL OF THE WORLD? In this article, three hypotheses for the reasons behind the rise in allergy are mentioned, collectively known as the 5 D’s:

Dry skin and Diet
Vitamin D
Dogs and Dribble

Perhaps the defining D is Drivel as regards this study. In reading over it, there is not a single mention of vaccinations, despite the following admission:

If you are unable to remember many children having an allergy when you were young, and have thought that it seems as though these days every second child has some kind of allergy, you’re not mistaken. The rate of food allergy in children has exploded over the last 30 years – from almost non-existence prior to the 1980s to >10% of infants tested in a Melbourne-based study having a verifiable food allergy in 2011.

The parliamentary enquiry will draw on the expertise of professionals like Professor Katie Allen who is mentioned in the article. She may be well-intentioned by her myopia ensures she will not see the elephant in the room.